<?xml version="1.0"?><XML><RECORDS><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004074</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Aditya, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kraak, M.-J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Geospatial data infrastructure portals: Using the national atlas as a metaphor</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Cartographica</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>41</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>115-133</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Cartographica</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network, GDI, GSDI, geoportal, metaphor, atlas, metadata mapping, browsing, searching, interoperability, infrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>GSDI_portals.pdf&#xD;references Kuuipo&apos;s thesis</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004010</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Aditya, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kraak, M.-J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>A search interface for an SDI: Implementation and evaluation of metadata visualization strategies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>413-436</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>Search interfaces for data discovery are essential in the context of a Geospatial Data&#xD;Infrastructure. This paper discusses the development of a search interface, aimed at&#xD;effective searches and an integration of a catalogue function and thematic mapping.&#xD;For this purpose, the Resources Description Framework (RDF) is used to store the&#xD;summaries of metadata of geospatial contents. These summaries are indexed based&#xD;on their topics. Their topic categories are expressed using the RDF schema. The RDF&#xD;queries and the transformation of results play a prominent role in the visualization&#xD;of search results as a table, a thumbnail, and a bull&#x2019;s-eye display with possibilities&#xD;to project footprints of results on top of a basic map and thematic layers. To highlight&#xD;their matches to the search terms, the Hausdorff distance and the closeness degree&#xD;were applied respectively to determine the geographic and thematic relevance.&#xD;Feedback from participants testing the prototype indicated the benefits of the table&#xD;and thumbnail displays as well as the possibility to combine these displays with&#xD;metadata and thematic mapping for data discovery. The feedback also confirmed&#xD;some design challenges in the depictions of relevance and symbolization of metadata.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; search_interfaces.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003584</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Agarwal, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Ontological considerations in GIScience</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>19</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>501-536</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ontology, geographic, semantics, concepts, interoperability, MMI</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004299</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Albrecht, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Derman, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ramasubramanian, L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Geo-ontology tools: The missing link</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>409-424</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special GIScience session at 2008 ESRI User Conference; teaching, GEO 580, ModelBuilder</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Numerous authors have presented ontology building tools that have all been&#xD;developed as part of academic projects and that are usually adaptations of more&#xD;generic tools for geo-spatial applications. While we trust that these tools do their job&#xD;for the special purpose they have been built, the GIScience user community is still a&#xD;long way away from off-the-shelf ontology builders that can be used by GIS project&#xD;managers. In this article, we present a comparative study of ontology building tools&#xD;described in some twenty peer-reviewed GIScience journal articles. We analyze them&#xD;from the perspective of two application domains, crime analysis and transportation/land&#xD;use. For the latter, we developed a database schema, which is substantially different&#xD;from the three main templates commonly used. The crime analysis application uses&#xD;a rule base for an agent-based model that had no precursor. In both cases, the&#xD;currently available set of tools cannot replace manual coding of ontologies for use&#xD;with ESRI-based application software. Based on these experiences, we outline a&#xD;requirements list of what the tools described in the first part of the article are missing&#xD;to make them practical from an applications perspective. The result is an R&amp;D&#xD;agenda for this important aspect of GIScience.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;geo-ontology.pdf&#xD;Derman almost came to OSU to be a doctoral student in my lab. Chose UW with Tim Nyerges</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003208</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Alder, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zeller, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pitcher, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sumaila, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>A method for evaluating marine protected area management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>121-131</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>conservation, marine protected areas, MPA, sanctuaries, SSE, habitat classification, mapping, representative, coastal management, management evaluation, performance criteria, model</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - mpa_mgmt.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>10</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003747</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Allan, J. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hart, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>A geographical information system (GIS) data set of beach morphodynamics derived from 1997, 1998, and 2002 LIDAR data for the central to northern Oregon coas</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Portland, Oregon</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI)</PUBLISHER><ISBN>Open file report O-05-09</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Oregon Coastal Atlas, OCA, coastal erosion tool suite</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001010</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Alleman, P. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Chance, T. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kleiner, A. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>New-generation mapper for shallow water hydrography</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>17-22</PAGES><ABSTRACT>New coastal, inland water imaging system promises significant increases in productivity with virtual real-time map production</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004227</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Alquezzar, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Boyd, W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Development of rapid, cost effective coral survey techniques: Tools for management and conservation planning</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Coastal Conser.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><PAGES>105-119</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Coastal Conservation: Planning and Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal management, conservatin, coral reef classification, field validation, GIS and oceanography, image analysis, rapid assessment, benthic habitat mapping, Great Barrier Reef</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Coral reefs are highly dynamic and productive&#xD;marine ecosystems, providing habitat and refuge for an&#xD;enormous number of species including fish, invertebrates&#xD;and algae. With increased anthropogenic pressures and&#xD;global climate change, many coral reefs are rapidly&#xD;declining. Currently, there is limited knowledge on condition&#xD;and community assemblage composition of shallow&#xD;fringing coral reefs along the south-eastern coast of&#xD;Queensland, Australia. With increased demand to determine&#xD;existence of coastal fringing reefs by National Regional&#xD;Management groups, a rapid cost effective method to&#xD;determine reef composition and condition was required.&#xD;The aim of this study was to determine the benthic structure&#xD;and extent of two small coastal fringing reefs (Hummock&#xD;Hill Reef and Stringers Reef) along the Southern Great&#xD;Barrier Reef. Reef substrate assessments were carried out&#xD;using a rapid assessment technique and a Point Intercept&#xD;Method (PIM). The data were analysed and classified using&#xD;a Geographic Information System (GIS). Percent substrate&#xD;cover was calculated using a visual basic image analysis&#xD;program. The Point intercept method showed higher&#xD;accuracy over the rapid assessment technique (up to 15&#x2013;&#xD;40% difference) and was thus deemed a more suitable&#xD;classification tool for reefs with high structural complexity&#xD;and heterogeneity. This study focused on piloting a rapid,&#xD;cost effective Point Intercept Technique using random point&#xD;count methodology to document coral benthic habitat and&#xD;extent over a commonly used rapid assessment method as a&#xD;tool for reef coastal management and conservation. The two techniques were compared and substrate classification&#xD;success, limitations and errors were discussed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>coral_surveys.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003393</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Anderson, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Moreno-Sanchez, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Building web-based spatial information solutions around open specifications and open source software</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>7</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>447-466</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>web GIS, Internet GIS, Oregon Coastal Atlas, OCA. open GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002872</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Andrezej Urbanski, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>The use of fuzzy sets in the evaluation of the environment of coastal waters</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>13</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>723-730</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003187</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Arin, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kramer, R. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Divers&apos; willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: An exploratory study</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><NUMBER>2-3</NUMBER><PAGES>171-183</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef conservation, sanctuaries, SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf - dive_marinesanctuaries.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003851</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Arpinar, I. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sheth, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ramakrishnan, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Usery, E. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Azami, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kwan, M.-P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Geospatial ontology development and semantic analytics</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>10</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>551-576</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>OCA, distributed computing, pervasive computing, web GIS, internet GIS, semantic interoperability, ontology, ontologies, Ireland</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Geospatial ontology development and semantic knowledge discovery addresses the&#xD;need for modeling, analyzing and visualizing multimodal information, and is unique&#xD;in offering integrated analytics that encompasses spatial, temporal and thematic&#xD;dimensions of information and knowledge. The comprehensive ability to provide&#xD;integrated analysis from multiple forms of information and use of explicit knowledge&#xD;make this approach unique. This also involves specification of spatiotemporal&#xD;thematic ontologies and populating such ontologies with high quality knowledge.&#xD;Such ontologies form the basis for defining the meaning of important relations terms,&#xD;such as near or surrounded by, and enable computation of spatiotemporal thematic&#xD;proximity measures we define. SWETO (Semantic Web Technology Evaluation&#xD;Ontology) and geospatial extension SWETO-GS are examples of these ontologies.&#xD;The Geospatial Semantics Analytics (GSA) framework incorporates: (1) the ability to automatically and semi-automatically tract metadata from syntactically (including&#xD;unstructured, semi-structured and structured data) and semantically heterogeneous&#xD;and multimodal data from diverse sources; and (2) analytical processing that exploits&#xD;these ontologies and associated knowledge bases, with integral support for what we&#xD;term spatiotemporal thematic proximity (STTP) reasoning and interactive&#xD;visualization capabilities. This paper discusses the results of our geospatial ontology&#xD;development efforts as well as some new semantic analytics methods on this ontology&#xD;such as STTP.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;geo_ontology.pdf&#xD;computer scientists working with geographers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002903</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Aston, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Experiences of coastal management in the Pacific islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>483-501</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE Papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004061</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Aswani, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lauer, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Benthic mapping using local aerial photo interpretation and resident taxa inventories for designing marine protected areas</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Env. Conserv.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>33</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>263-273</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Environmental Conservation</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>benthic mapping, benthic habitat, geographical information</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>systems (GIS), indigenous ecological knowledge, marine</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>protected areas, Oceania, taxa inventories</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Given the frequent socioeconomic, political and&#xD;concomitant ecological failures of science-driven&#xD;marine protected area (MPA) programmes, it is now&#xD;important to design MPAs by integrating natural and&#xD;social science research more comprehensively. This&#xD;study shows how indigenous peoples assisted in the&#xD;design of MPAs by identifying marine substrates and&#xD;related resident taxa on aerial photos, information&#xD;which was then incorporated into a geographical&#xD;information system (GIS) database, along with dive&#xD;survey data. Two questions were asked: (1) Is indigenous&#xD;ecological knowledge accurate enough for&#xD;mapping the benthos and associated taxa? (2) Is such&#xD;an approach an appropriate way for assisting in the&#xD;biological and social design of MPAs in Oceania?&#xD;Conventional quadrat field dive surveys were used&#xD;to measure the accuracy of substrate identification&#xD;by local informants and a visual survey was used&#xD;to test hypotheses formulated from local knowledge&#xD;regarding the spatial distribution and relative&#xD;abundance of non-cryptic species within certain&#xD;benthic habitats. Equivalence rates between indigenous&#xD;aerial photo interpretations of dominant benthic&#xD;substrates and in situ dive surveys were 75&#x2013;85%&#xD;for a moderately detailed classification scheme of&#xD;the benthos, which included nine locally-defined&#xD;abiotic and biotic benthic classes for the MPA&#xD;seabed. Similarly, the taxa inventory showed a strong&#xD;correspondence between the qualitative predictions of&#xD;local fisherfolk and the quantitative analysis of noncryptic&#xD;species distribution, including their relative&#xD;abundance and geophysical locations. Indigenous&#xD;people&#x2019;s predictions about the presence or absence of&#xD;fish in different benthic habitats corresponded77%and&#xD;92% of the time (depending on scoring schema)&#xD;with in situ visual measurements. These results&#xD;demonstrate how incorporating local knowledge of&#xD;benthic heterogeneity, existing biological communities,&#xD;and particular spatio-temporal events of biological&#xD;significance into a GIS database can corroborate&#xD;the production of scientifically reliable base resource maps for designing MPAs in an environmentally and&#xD;culturally sound fashion. This participatory approach&#xD;was used to design and then establish MPAs in&#xD;the Roviana and Vonavona region of the Western&#xD;Solomon Islands. Under appropriate conditions, interdisciplinary&#xD;work can complement the design&#xD;of scientific fishery management and biodiversity&#xD;conservation prescriptions for coastal Oceania.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>BenthicMap_GISCommunity.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004362</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Athanasis, N.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kalabokidis, K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vaitis, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Soulakellis, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>in press, 2008</YEAR><TITLE>Towards a semantics-based approach in the development of geographic portals</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><PAGES>doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.01.014</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers &amp; Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>geoportal; semantic web; RDF; metadata; navigation, metadata, portals, ICAN</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>As the demand for geospatial data increases, the lack of efficient&#xD;ways to find suitable information becomes critical. In this paper, a&#xD;new methodology for knowledge discovery in geographic portals is presented.&#xD;Based on the Semantic Web, our approach exploits the Resource&#xD;Description Framework (RDF) in order to describe the geoportal&#x2019;s information&#xD;with ontology-based metadata. When users traverse from page to&#xD;page in the portal, they take advantage of the metadata infrastructure to&#xD;navigate easily through data of interest. New metadata descriptions are&#xD;published in the geoportal according to the RDF schemas.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>semantic_geoportals.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003537</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bacao, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lobo, V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Painho, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>The self-organizing map, the Geo-SOM, and relevant variants for geosciences</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>155-163</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers and Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special issue on AGILE, Association of Geographic Information Laboratories in Europe, GIScience in Europe, </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Self-Organizing Map; Geo-SOM; SOM variants; Geo-referenced data, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, COMCI</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - AGILE_CompGEosci--&gt;SOM.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002929</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bailey, R. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1997</YEAR><TITLE>The Oregon ocean resources management program: State-level ocean management initiative</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>205-224</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>clearinghouse, coastal management, history</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, FGDC 2</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003906</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Baine, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Howard, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kerr, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Edgar, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Toral, V.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal and marine resource management in the Galapagos Islands and the Archipelago of San Andres: Issues, problems and opportunities</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>50</VOLUME><PAGES>148-173</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>Tourism and fisheries comprise the economic backbone of the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador and the&#xD;Archipelago of San Andres, Colombia. The health of fishery resources, the environment and their&#xD;dependant industries is discussed against a background of policy development and user conflicts,&#xD;supported by a range of technical studies undertaken between 1998 and 2002, setting the scene for an&#xD;examination of a more participatory and effective role for local stakeholders in the management of&#xD;their island resources. Local stakeholders have been involved in guiding plans on future management&#xD;of both islands&#x2019; resources including Biosphere Reserve designation of the San Andres Archipelago&#xD;and the development of a Special Law for Galapagos. Their participation is deemed essential to&#xD;progress in marine resource management and zoning initiatives within the islands.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>galagagos_MPA.pdf&#xD;whole issue is special issue on management of the Galagagos</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003870</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Baird, A. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Maritime policy in Scotland</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Marit. Pol. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>32</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>383-401</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Maritime Policy and Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>This paper begins by defining the meaning of the term &#x2018;maritime policy&#x2019;. Since&#xD;devolution in the UK, the opening of the new Scottish parliament in 1998 and&#xD;the creation of the Scottish Executive, little effort has been made to establish a&#xD;distinct maritime policy for Scotland. As was evident prior to devolution, the&#xD;primary emphasis from any maritime policy perspective has continued to be a&#xD;focus on lifeline island ferry services. This ignores significant developments in&#xD;several other key maritime transport sectors, and this paper provides examples&#xD;of areas that require some form of policy response, including intra-European&#xD;short sea shipping, UK coastal shipping, urban/river transport and global container&#xD;shipping. Long-standing institutional bias against maritime transport&#xD;coupled with subsidy devoted almost entirely to land transport systems has&#xD;resulted in a quite distorted marketplace. This suggests that a maritime policy&#xD;is now imperative if maritime transport is to play a more significant role in&#xD;the overall transport system. Further discussion centres on the need to consider,&#xD;from a Scottish policy perspective, the role of various state-sponsored maritime&#xD;service providers and how these bodies might fit better within evolving policy.&#xD;The conclusion is that formulation of a maritime policy by the Scottish Executive&#xD;is overdue and that a degree of restructuring of transport responsibilities within&#xD;the Executive, combined with adequate resource allocation towards the maritime&#xD;industry, will be necessary in order that market distortions can be overcome,&#xD;so enabling Scotland to fully exploit the competitive and environmental&#xD;advantages that maritime transport can provide.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>maritime_scotland.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004343</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Baker, K. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Chandler, C. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Enabling long-term oceanographic research: Changing data practices, information management strategies and informatics.</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Deep-Sea Res. II</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>55</VOLUME><PAGES>doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.05.009</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Deep Sea Research Part II</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean informatics, data management, GIS and oceanography, MMI, ICAN, cyberinfrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Interdisciplinary global ocean science requires new ways of thinking about data and data management.&#xD;With new data policies and growing technological capabilities, datasets of increasing variety and&#xD;complexity are being made available digitally and data management is coming to be recognized as an&#xD;integral part of scientific research. To meet the changing expectations of scientists collecting data and of&#xD;data reuse by others, collaborative strategies involving diverse teams of information professionals are&#xD;developing. These changes are stimulating the growth of information infrastructures that support&#xD;multi-scale sampling, data repositories, and data integration. Two examples of oceanographic projects&#xD;incorporating data management in partnership with science programs are discussed: the Palmer Station&#xD;Long-Term Ecological Research program (Palmer LTER) and the United States Joint Global Ocean Flux&#xD;Study (US JGOFS). Lessons learned from a decade of data management within these communities&#xD;provide an experience base from which to develop information management strategies&#x2014;short-term&#xD;and long-term. Ocean Informatics provides one example of a conceptual framework for managing the&#xD;complexities inherent to sharing oceanographic data. Elements are introduced that address the&#xD;economies-of-scale and the complexities-of-scale pertinent to a broader vision of information&#xD;management and scientific research.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>baker_chandler.pdf&#xD;Extremely important article!!!</NOTES><URL>http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.05.009</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003541</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Baker, T. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Internet-based GIS mapping in support of K-12 education</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Prof. Geog.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>57</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>44-50</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>The Professional Geographer</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS Education; Internet-based GIS; K-12 GIS, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, Samoa, NOAA NESDIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Internet-based mapping provides a powerful alternative for successfully establishing GIS technology in the K-12 education community, while simultaneously avoiding the traditional barriers associated with desktop GIS. Internet-based GIS can support standards-based inquiry methods of teaching and learning while providing basic analysis tools for studying and exploring geographic or scientific data in the classroom.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003867</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Balaji, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sannasiraj, S. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sundar, V.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Tsunami wave interaction with data buoys</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>29</VOLUME><PAGES>235-251</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>tsunami impact, natural disaster, discus data buoy, heave, pitch, solitary wave, cnoidal wave</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>To plan for proper mitigation measures, one should have an advanced knowledge of the&#xD;phenomenon of tsunami propagation from the deep ocean to coastal waters. There are a&#xD;few methods to predict tsunamis in the ocean waters; one method is the effective use of&#xD;data buoy measurements. Although data buoys have been used along the Indian waters&#xD;there has been a tremendous growth in the number of buoy deployment recently. Under&#xD;the National Data Buoy Programme (NDBP) of India, the 2.2 m diameter discus data&#xD;buoys were deployed along the east and west coasts of India for measuring meteorological&#xD;and ocean parameters. It would be advantageous if these buoys could be efficiently&#xD;used to measure rare events such as tsunamis. Understanding the dynamic behavior of&#xD;the buoy is of prime importance if a tsunami warning system is to be successful. This&#xD;may be accomplished through experimental or numerical studies. A comprehensive experimental&#xD;study has been conducted to understand the dynamic behavior of a wave&#xD;rider buoy exposed to a variety of waves. It is common that tsunami waves are represented&#xD;in terms of shallow water waves, namely solitary and cnoidal waves. Hence, in&#xD;the present study, the discus type data buoy is scale modeled and tested under the action&#xD;of solitary and cnoidal waves in the laboratory. The time histories of wave elevations,&#xD;as well as heave and pitch motions of the buoy model, were analyzed through a spectral&#xD;approach as well as through wavelet transformations. The wavelet approach gives more&#xD;detailed insight into the spectral characteristics of the buoy motion in the time scale.&#xD;The harmonic analyses were performed for the cnoidal wave elevations and subsequent&#xD;motion characteristics that give an insight into the energy variations. The details&#xD;of the model, instrumentation, testing conditions and the results are presented in this&#xD;paper.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>tsunami_wave_buoys.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003161</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Balgos, M. C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2001</YEAR><TITLE><styles><style face='2' start='10'></style><style start='79'></style></styles>Review of Marine and Coastal Protected Areas: A Guide for Planners and Managers, 3rd Edition</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>44</VOLUME><PAGES>561-562</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Here is the whole review!&#xD;This book covers the basic concepts of establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) including the multiple&#xD;benefits that can be derived from them, the methods and approaches of MPA establishment such as site&#xD;planning and management, community engagement, selection of sites, and institutional and legal framework&#xD;This edition of the book, like the first two that have been long out of print, provides examples of strategies and&#xD;tools, and specific techniques for MPA establishment in different environments including coral reefs, lagoons&#xD;and estuaries, small islands, and beaches. Highlights of case histories of protected areas in various parts of the&#xD;world provide variations to the general model of MPAs recommended by the authors.&#xD;&#xD;The book aims to encourage people interested in establishing MPAs to take the immediate first steps. The&#xD;definition of terms embedded in the text is particularly useful for those who are new in the field. The general&#xD;outline followed in each section (what, why, how, by whom) provides clear guidance on the sequential steps&#xD;that need to be taken in the process of MPA establishment. However, the hows are limited in some of the&#xD;sections (e.g., monitoring and evaluation) and practically non-existent on developing alternative livelihood&#xD;options for fishers and other displaced stakeholders. There is an information gap on the latter topic that has&#xD;become crucial to the potential effectiveness of MPAs in places where stakeholder groups have been&#xD;disadvantaged by their establishment, such as fishers in MPAs with no-take fishery reserves. The need for&#xD;practical approaches to this problem has become particularly important as scientists, decision makers and&#xD;managers now recognize the need to incorporate no-take fishery reserves into protected area planning and&#xD;management as a standard practice in the design of MPA sites and networks [1 and 2]. Furthermore, in some&#xD;sections of the book, the authors tended to be too definite as to the necessity of the item discussed, such as the&#xD;need for a site manager. In the Philippines, core groups commonly constitute the managers of&#xD;community-based MPAs [3]. The readers may be led to think that the model being discussed is the only one&#xD;viable and might get the impression that without all the elements described as required, initiating MPAs would&#xD;be futile, especially in developing countries where institutional sources of funds and other resources for&#xD;sustained environmental management are limited. Various guidance documents in establishing MPAs in various&#xD;levels of specificity and usefulness at the global, regional, national, and sub-national levels provide multiple&#xD;models of MPA establishment.&#xD;&#xD;The incorporation of coastal management approaches in each stage of MPA establishment in the book&#xD;emphasizes the vital links between MPAs and broader coastal management programs. In particular, the&#xD;recommendation of the use of issue&#xAF;action analysis, which is a common coastal management technique,&#xD;encourages the adoption of coastal management techniques successfully applied in other types of&#xD;management projects and points to the need for incorporating MPAs under umbrella coastal management&#xD;programs for greater assurance of sustainability.&#xD;&#xD;There are a few places in the book where the authors could have used more recent references on specific&#xD;topics discussed (e.g., in p. 21 on preservation of genetic material; in p. 29 on protection of giant clams in the&#xD;Philippines). Pointing to various references that can provide details on specific techniques including addresses&#xD;of useful Internet sources would have been very helpful.&#xD;&#xD;Still, this book is without a doubt a very good guidance handbook in MPAs for site managers and national&#xD;policy people, not only to those who are just about to start MPA establishment but also to those in need of a&#xD;toolkit for trouble-shooting. A companion guide that could augment the thin discussion on monitoring and&#xD;evaluation, a topic that is very important in implementing major adjustments and refinements in MPA planning&#xD;and implementation, is the book Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of&#xD;Protected Areas [4].</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004097</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Barbier, E. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Koch, E. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Silliman, B. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hacker, S. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wolanski, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Primavera, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Granek, E. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Polasky, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Aswani, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cramer, L. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Stoms, D. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kennedy, C. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bael, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kappel, C. V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Perillo, G. M. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Reed, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Science</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>319</VOLUME><PAGES>321-323, doi: 10.1126/science.1150349</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal habitat, EBM, ecosystem-based management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>A common assumption is that ecosystem services respond linearly to changes in habitat size.&#xD;This assumption leads frequently to an &#x201C;all or none&#x201D; choice of either preserving coastal habitats&#xD;or converting them to human use. However, our survey of wave attenuation data from field studies&#xD;of mangroves, salt marshes, seagrass beds, nearshore coral reefs, and sand dunes reveals that&#xD;these relationships are rarely linear. By incorporating nonlinear wave attenuation in estimating&#xD;coastal protection values of mangroves in Thailand, we show that the optimal land use option may&#xD;instead be the integration of development and conservation consistent with ecosystem-based&#xD;management goals. This result suggests that reconciling competing demands on coastal habitats&#xD;should not always result in stark preservation-versus-conversion choices.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>EBM_coastal.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002541</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bartlett, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>Space, time, chaos, and coastal GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>International Cartographic Conference</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Cologne, Germany</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Internal Cartographic Conference</PUBLISHER><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><PAGES>539-551</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, Ocean GIS book</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>10</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001450</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bartlett, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>GIS and the Coastal Zone: An Annotated Bibliography</TITLE><PUBLISHER>National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis</PUBLISHER><DATE>October 1993</DATE><TYPE_OF_WORK>Technical Report</TYPE_OF_WORK><ISBN>93-9</ISBN><LABEL>NCGIA</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and coastal oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the technical report</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002977</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Basu, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Case study of land and marine data integration using GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Surv. Land Inf. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>58</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>147-155</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Surveying and Land Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine and coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS, special issue, Oahu, spatial analysis, three-dimensional ocean floor, 3D</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004096</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Batcheller, J. K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Automating geospatial metadata generation&#x2014;An integrated data management and documentation approach</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><PAGES>387-398</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers &amp; Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Geospatial metadata; Metadata authoring; Metadata generation; Data management; Data documentation; MMI; ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Geospatial metadata have long played an important role in the management of geospatial datasets. Often employed by&#xD;institutions to organise, maintain and document their geographic resources internally, metadata may also provide a vehicle&#xD;for exposing marketable data assets externally when contributed to on-line geospatial exchange initiatives. In spite of the&#xD;numerous benefits it affords, obstacles to the production of such geospatial surrogates are numerous. The current work&#xD;proposes an approach aimed at reducing the effort associated with geospatial metadata generation through the&#xD;customisation of a proprietary Geographical Information System (GIS). By coupling data preparation, management and&#xD;documentation approaches with such a bespoke application, it is intended to mitigate impediments to geospatial metadata&#xD;generation whilst promoting a system of data administration that safeguards the data it supports. The current prototype,&#xD;implementing an extended Dublin Core geospatial profile of 23 elements, was capable of generating a total of 20 basic&#xD;metadata entries. While the findings do not suggest a dispensability of human mediation in the authoring process, they do&#xD;support the view that a dataset&#x2019;s ambient computing infrastructure has the potential to play a significant role in&#xD;automating the creation of geospatial metadata.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>metadata_generation.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004197</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bechhofer, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hauswirth, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hoffmann, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Koubarakis, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The Semantic Web: Research and Applications</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5021, 5th European SemanticWeb Conference, ESWC 2008, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, June 1-5, 2008, Proceedings</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Berlin/Heidelberg</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Springer</PUBLISHER><VOLUME>5021</VOLUME><PAGES>10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9</PAGES><ISBN>978-3-540-68233-2</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, cyberinfrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This volume contains the papers from the technical programme of the 5th European&#xD;Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2008, that took place during June 1&#x2013;5,&#xD;2008 in Tenerife, Islas Canarias, Spain.&#xD;ESWC 2008 was the latest in a series of annual, international events focusing&#xD;on the dissemination and discussion of the latest research and applications&#xD;of Semantic Web technologies. The call for papers saw over 270 submissions,&#xD;a comparable figure to the previous year, indicating that the conference series&#xD;has reached a certain level of maturity. The review process was organized using&#xD;a two-tiered system. First, each submission was reviewed by at least three&#xD;members of the Programme Committee. Submissions were also assigned to a Senior&#xD;Programme Committee member, who led discussions between reviewers and&#xD;provided a metareview and provisional decision. A physical Programme Committee&#xD;meeting was then held, where the final decisions were made. Competition&#xD;was as strong as ever, and the Programme Committee selected 51 papers to be&#xD;presented at the conference.&#xD;In addition to the technical research paper track, a system demo track was&#xD;included, with its own review process. Twenty-five demo papers were selected for&#xD;publication. System demo authors were given the opportunity to present their&#xD;work in dedicated sessions during the conference, while an evening reception was&#xD;also devoted to the presentation of posters and demonstrations of systems.&#xD;As in past years, ESWC subscribed to the call to &#x201C;eat our own dog food,&#x201D;&#xD;with the publication of a rich set of semantic metadata describing the conference.&#xD;Three invited talks were given by distinguished scientists: Nigel Shadbolt&#xD;(Garlik Ltd. and University of Southampton, UK) spoke about the use of Semantic&#xD;Technology for the consumer; the challenge of Semantic Search was the&#xD;subject of a talk from Ricardo Baeza-Yates (Yahoo! Research); and Claudio&#xD;Gutierrez (Universidad de Chile) presented work on the state of the art in RDF&#xD;Database theory.&#xD;The conference also included a programme of tutorials and associated workshops,&#xD;held on the days preceeding the main conference track. A PhD symposium&#xD;took place immediately before the conference, giving doctoral students within&#xD;the Semantic Web community an opportunity to showcase their work and obtain&#xD;valuable feedback from senior members of the community. This year, we&#xD;also introduced a programme of panel discussions, bringing together experts to&#xD;debate key issues in the Semantic Web research area.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>PDF_Journal_articles --&gt; Semantic_Web_eBook</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004201</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bekkby, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Isachsen, P. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Isaeus, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bakkestuen, V.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>GIS modeling of wave exposure at the seabed: A depth-attenuated wave exposure model</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>117-127</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Depth attenuation, GIS modeling, seabed substrate, wave exposure, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Several studies have documented relationships between wave exposure and distribution,&#xD;density, and size of marine species. Hence, this factor is at a high level in the hierarchical&#xD;habitat classification system EUNIS and is one of the Water Framework Directive water&#xD;typology criteria of coastal waters. Is&#xE6;us (2004) has developed a continuous simplified&#xD;wave model (SWM) that has been applied to several Nordic countries.Here we refine this&#xD;model by introducing depth-attenuation, giving us the advantage of a model for wave&#xD;exposure as it will actually work at the seabed. The values of the depth-attenuated model&#xD;SWM(d) are approximately similar to the SWM model in shallow areas but noticeably&#xD;lower in deep areas. The two models were compared in an analysis of the distribution&#xD;of seabed substrate in the Stockholm archipelago. Using the depth-attenuated wave&#xD;exposure instead of the SWM model as predictor in substrate modeling improved these&#xD;models considerably.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>wave_exposure_GIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000000873</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Benwell, G. L. </AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Firns, P. G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sallis, P. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1991</YEAR><TITLE>Deriving semantic data models from structured process descriptions of reality</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Info. Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Information Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>6</VOLUME><PAGES>15-25</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>process modelling, petri nets, logical access mapping, GIS, simulation</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003885</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Berkes, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Berkes, M. K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fast, H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Collaborative integrated management in Canada&apos;s north: The role of local and traditional knowledge and community-based monitoring</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><PAGES>143-162</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Arctic, Beaufort Sea, community-based monitoring, Cree, Hudson Bay,</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>integrated management, Inuit, Inuvialuit, traditional ecological knowledge, TEK</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The objective of this article is to take stock of integrated management in the Canadian&#xD;North, assessing its contribution to the advancement of knowledge and practice&#xD;regarding the role of indigenous knowledge and community-based monitoring. This&#xD;is done in three steps. (1) The Beaufort Sea, designated a Large Ocean Management&#xD;Area under Canada&#x2019;s Oceans Action Plan, is used as an example of a consultative&#xD;planning process, with special attention to indigenous peoples. (2) How specifically&#xD;can indigenous knowledge contribute to integrated management? The problem of Arctic&#xD;marine food web contamination is used to illustrate the strengths and limitations of&#xD;traditional ecological knowledge and its relationship to science. (3) The discussion&#xD;of community-based monitoring relies on Voices From The Bay study involving the&#xD;Inuit and Cree of Hudson and James Bay, and Inuit observations of climate change&#xD;study in the Canadian western Arctic. The examples together address integrated coastal&#xD;management and the health of ocean ecosystems, showing how stakeholder participation&#xD;and knowledge helps widen the range of knowledge to understand and help monitor&#xD;environmental change.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>TEK_Canada.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004009</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bilasco, I. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gensel, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Villanova-Oliver, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Martin, H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Towards geospatial queries in a semantic digital library for 3D data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>337-354</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>The evolution of the computing power as well as the success of standards such as X3D&#xD;point to a future omnipresence of 3D in the multimedia world. A broad panoply of tools&#xD;assisting designers when building realistic 3D scenes exists. In a near future, a new&#xD;challenge will be to control the quantity of 3D contents that will be available. For instance,&#xD;large amounts of 2D or 3D geographic data are spread all over the Internet. Nevertheless,&#xD;appropriate description techniques and tools for the deployment and the retrieval of&#xD;such data are still lacking. Our global objective is to propose a geographic digital&#xD;library which can be exploited for describing, annotating and indexing geographic&#xD;contents using geometric and topologic descriptions, geographic and appearance features,&#xD;and semantics. Descriptions, annotations, and indexations are then exploited in queries&#xD;to retrieve contents. The existing 3D scene description languages are generally free&#xD;of any semantic information which could improve the management of 3D data (and&#xD;especially research and re-use). In this paper, we propose the construction of geographic&#xD;3D data warehouses managed by a semantic digital library 3DSDL (3D Semantic&#xD;Digital Library). This library, through a standardized communication interface, gives&#xD;access to all the 3D models indexed in the warehouse and facilitates their exploitation.&#xD;Each object is characterized by a set of both semantic and geographic annotations&#xD;and some common features (colour, geometry, and topology).</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; semantic_3D.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>10</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003817</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Boesch, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Groat, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Killeen, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>et al.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Hurricanes and the U.S. Gulf Coast: Science and Sustainable Rebuilding</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Washington, D.C.</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>American Geophysical Union</PUBLISHER><PAGES>1-29</PAGES><DATE>June 19, 2006</DATE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>hurricanes, storm surge and flooding, subsidence, climate change, hydrology, infrastructure, disaster preparedness and response, decision support, hazards</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>&#xD;The knowledge available among AGU members provides scientific expertise on nearly all of the physical environment of the dynamic Gulf Coast ecosystem complex. Intelligently rebuilding features such as fisheries, oil fields, seaports, farms, and wetlands after hurricanes Katrina and Rita will require &#x201C;a well-constructed collaborative effort to maximize the role of science in decisions made about the rebuilding,&#x201D; wrote Charles Groat, former director of the U.S. Geological Survey, in a news article published in Eos that stimulated an AGU meeting of experts.&#xD;As a step toward developing a scientific basis for safer communities along the Florida-Alabama-Mississippi-Louisiana-Texas coastline, the American Geophysical Union (AGU) convened an interdisciplinary &#x201C;Conference of Experts&#x201D; on 11&#x2013;12 January 2006 to discuss what we, as Earth and space scientists, know about the present and projected environment in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast areas affected by the hurricanes of 2005. Twenty scientists, all experts in the fields of science relevant to the Gulf Coast, met to consider ideas for a coordinated effort to integrate science into the decision-making processes necessary for the area&#x2019;s sustainable rebirth. Political, economic, and social issues were intentionally not discussed. Nevertheless, it was recognized that science and these issues are intertwined and of paramount importance. This report contains a summary of the discussion and is intended to be helpful in providing scientific understanding useful in redevelopment of the affected area.&#xD;The objectives of the meeting were to review and assess the scientific knowledge in the areas most relevant in hurricane protection, to identify gaps in knowledge that could be filled by focused research, and to propose mechanisms to link science to the most effective reconstruction of New Orleans and other coastal areas affected by the recent hurricanes. The meeting attendees considered seven topics addressing the current understanding, near-term needs, and longer-term directions for: hurricanes, storm surge and flooding, subsidence, climate change, hydrology, infrastructure, and disaster preparedness and response.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>hurricanes_sci_sustainable.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.agu.org/report/hurricanes/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004281</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Brocchini, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Baldock, T. E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Recent advances in modeling swash zone dynamics: Influence of surf-swash interaction on nearshore hydrodynamics and morphodynamics</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Rev. Geophys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>46</VOLUME><NUMBER>RG3003</NUMBER><PAGES>doi:10.1029/2006RG000215</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>review</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Reviews of Geophysics</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>swash zone, nearshore dynamics; nearshore oceanography; Marine Geology and Geophysics: Marine hydrogeology; 4546 Oceanography: Physical: Nearshore processes; 3285 Mathematical Geophysics: Wave propagation</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The role of the swash zone in influencing the whole nearshore dynamics is reviewed with a focus on the interaction between surf and swash zone processes. Local and global hydromorphodynamic phenomena are discussed in detail, and a description of the overall swash zone operation is given. The effects of swash zone boundary conditions are highlighted, together with the importance of surf zone boundary conditions. Major emphasis is placed on illustrating the interactions of various hydrodynamic modes which, in turn, control the swash and surf zone morphology. Finally, methods to account for swash zone processes in coastal models with different temporal and spatial resolutions are proposed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>swash_zone.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004012</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Brodaric, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Geo-pragmatics for the geospatial semantic web</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>453-477</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>Geo-Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in&#xD;which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but&#xD;their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework&#xD;for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions,&#xD;agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept&#x2019;s origins, uses and effects; these&#xD;are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve&#xD;entities with roles developed from method-driven perspectives and epistemic-driven&#xD;versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and&#xD;implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a&#xD;basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its&#xD;geographical-historical context. Geo-pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate&#xD;the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in&#xD;emerging e-science initiatives.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; geopragmatics2.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003684</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Bruce, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Eliot, I.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>A spatial model for marine park zoning</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>17-38</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, legislation; marine management; spatial analysis; zoning marine protected areas, MPA, OCA</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT> The complexity of stakeholder interests, governing structures, and biophysical processes often present challenges in adopting multiple-use approaches in the management of large marine areas. Marine zoning plans provide a mechanism for ensuring the realization of conservation objectives under spatially varying levels of resource use. The need for a systematic and transparent approach to zone planning highlights the role of Geographical Information Science (GIS)-based techniques. The spatial analysis capabilities of GIS enable the development of useful tools for decision makers to interactively explore the outcomes of their decisions and evaluate alternatives. The aim of this study is to develop a generic model for Marine Park zoning that translates management policy into zoning plan options. In demonstrating this model an application to the Shark Bay Marine Park in Western Australia is presented. The model incorporates input from different marine park users and accounts for the legislative requirements of relevant government agencies. User groups indicate their preferences by weighting the importance of management policies and selecting the zone type to be assigned to each marine resource. Hypothetical user views were adopted in the Shark Bay Marine Park application to demonstrate the impact of different decision biases. A series of four alternative zoning plans are generated and assessed in terms of their practical implementation. The outcomes of this study highlight the model&apos;s ability to present zoning plan alternatives that reflect varying user opinion. This is evident in the contrasting zoning patterns of generated plans. In assessing the effectiveness of each zoning plan for achieving selected management objectives the research also developed mechanisms to evaluate proposed zoning alternatives. Limitations to the model include the influence of policy structure, the need for integration with terrestrial management, and spatial data uncertainty. The model contributes to multiple-use marine park management by providing a method in which planning options are generated based on existing policy frameworks and transparency in the decision-making process is enabled through interactive weighting techniques. &#xA0;</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004222</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Buccella, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cechich, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fillottrani, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>in press, 2008</YEAR><TITLE>Ontology-driven geographic information integration: A survey of&#xD;current approaches</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><PAGES>doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.033</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers &amp; Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Geographic Information</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Data integration</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Heterogeneous databases</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Formal ontologies; PNAS special issue; cyberinfrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Integrating different information sources is a growing research area within different&#xD;application domains. This is particularly true for the geographic information domain&#xD;which is facing new challenges because newer and better technologies are capturing&#xD;large amounts of information about the Earth. This trend can be combined with&#xD;increases in the distribution of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) on the Web,&#xD;which is leading to the proliferation of different geospatial information repositories and&#xD;the subsequent need to integrate information across repositories to get consistent&#xD;information. To overcome this situation, many proposals use ontologies in the&#xD;integration process. In this paper we analyze and compare the most widely referred&#xD;proposals of geographic information integration, focusing on those using ontologies as&#xD;semantic tools to represent the sources, and to facilitate the integration process.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>geo-ontology.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004328</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Budhathoki, N. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bruce, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nedovic-Budic, Z.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GeoJournal</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>72</VOLUME><PAGES>149-160</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GeoJournal</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>volunteered geographic information, VGI, Participatory design   User  </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Produser   Web 2.0, spatial data infrastructure, SDI</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Spatial data infrastructures, which are&#xD;Internet-based mechanisms for the coordinated production,&#xD;discovery, and use of geospatial information&#xD;in the digital environment, have diffused worldwide&#xD;in the last two decades. Currently, there are about one&#xD;hundred spatial data infrastructures at the national&#xD;level and many other at supra- and sub-national&#xD;levels. These contemporary spatial data infrastructures&#xD;operate with two main assumptions: formal&#xD;organizations are the producers and suppliers of&#xD;geospatial information; users are the passive recipients&#xD;of information. The recent phenomenon of&#xD;volunteered geographic information departs from&#xD;these assumptions. In this paper, we argue that&#xD;reconceptualizing the user of a spatial data infrastructure&#xD;can accommodate this new phenomenon.&#xD;Such a reconceptualization creates a middle ground&#xD;between spatial data infrastructure and volunteered&#xD;geographic information, which has important implications&#xD;for future research.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>VGI--&gt;VGI_SDI.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004334</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Buxton, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The next Google</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>1-3</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, 3D environments</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Ten years ago this month, Google&#x2019;s first employee turned up at the garage where the search engine&#xD;was originally housed. What technology at a similar early stage today will have changed our&#xD;world as much by 2018? Nature asked some researchers and business people to speculate &#x2014; or&#xD;lay out their wares. Their responses are wide ranging, but one common theme emerges: the integration of&#xD;the worlds of matter and information, whether it be by the blurring of boundaries between online and real&#xD;environments, touchy-feely feedback from a phone or chromosomes tucked away on databases.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_google.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003849</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Caldeweyher, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zhang, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pham, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>OpenCIS - Open source GIS-based web community information system</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>20</VOLUME><NUMBER>8</NUMBER><PAGES>885-898</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>research article</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>spatial data infrastructures, SDI, web GIS, MapServer, Mapscript, grassroots empowerment, open source</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003807</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Campbell, M. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hewitt, C. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>A hierarchical framework to aid biodiversity assessment for coastal zone management and marine protected area selection</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>49</VOLUME><PAGES>133-146</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine conservation, multiple-use zoning, no-take zones, small-scale fisheries, MPA, marine protected areas, stakeholders</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The need to rapidly and accurately identify areas for protection and conservation in the marine&#xD;environment has been highlighted as of critical importance. Managers require timely and costeffective&#xD;techniques to obtain biodiversity information at appropriate scales and resolutions aligned&#xD;with management objectives and stakeholders requirements. In this paper, a two-stage, multi-level&#xD;data collection framework is presented that will aid managers to focus on what marine biodiversity&#xD;collection techniques will meet their individual jurisdictional needs.&#xD;The framework begins with an integrated planning process (objective setting, stakeholder&#xD;identification, and sensitivity and gap analyses), that leads to a hierarchical approach for selecting&#xD;biodiversity assessment techniques that will gather required marine biodiversity data. Complexity of&#xD;scale and resolution increases as one progress&#x2019;s through the hierarchical levels of Stage II. The utility&#xD;of using a hierarchical framework is that it surmounts the problem that no single technique can&#xD;quantify all biological attributes necessary for management outcomes. Also, the user enters the&#xD;framework at a hierarchical level that meets their requirements thus removing the collection of&#xD;redundant data. Ultimately, the rapid assessment framework is based on the efficient and sufficient&#xD;assessment of marine biodiversity.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>hierarchical_fw.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003888</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Canessa, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Butler, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Leblanc, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Stewart, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Howes, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Spatial information infrastructure for integrated coastal and ocean management in Canada</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><PAGES>105-142</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Canada, coastal management, spatial information, coastal GIS, coastal atlas</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Access to current, comprehensive, and reliable spatial information is necessary for&#xD;informed decision making in integrated coastal and ocean management. This need&#xD;is being met through development of a marine spatial information infrastructure&#xD;that encompasses both technological and institutional responses. This article traces&#xD;Canada&#x2019;s experience in developing a marine spatial information infrastructure over the&#xD;last 30 years starting with the compilation of coastal atlases, through the development&#xD;of geographic information systems, to remote data acquisition instruments and Web&#xD;mapping portals. Because of the plethora of initiatives, it has been essential to be&#xD;selected and limit the number and choice of examples. The institutional response has&#xD;lagged behind that of technological innovation and hinges on understanding users&#x2019; needs&#xD;and decision support drivers, sustainability of institutional and individual champions,&#xD;and, above all, cooperation and collaboration among the broad community of practice.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>SDI_Canada.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003216</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Chakraborty, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schenke, H. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kodagali, V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hagen, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Estimating deep seafloor interface and volume roughness parameters using the multibeam-Hydrosweep system</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>25</VOLUME><PAGES>19-26</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, coastal GIS, marine GIS, special issue, multibeam echosounder, angular backscatter, seafloor roughness, composite roughness theory, Southern Oceans</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have pdf file - seafloor_roughness.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004123</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Chan, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Barth, J. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lubchenco, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kirincich, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Weeks, H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Peterson, W. T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Menge, B. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Emergence of anoxia in the California Current large marine ecosystem</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Science</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>319</VOLUME><NUMBER>5865</NUMBER><PAGES>920-921</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>severe hypoxia</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Eastern boundary current systems are&#xD;among the most productive large marine&#xD;ecosystems in the world. Their productivity&#xD;arises from wind-driven upwelling of&#xD;nutrient-rich water into the photic zones of&#xD;coastal oceans and supports 20% of global fishery&#xD;yield (1). Upwelling also transports oxygenpoor&#xD;waters onto productive continental shelves,&#xD;where respiration can further reduce watercolumn&#xD;dissolved oxygen (DO) content and&#xD;thus subject coastal ecosystems to the risk of&#xD;hypoxia or anoxia.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>hypoxia.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004240</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Chand, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rise,L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bellec, V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Dolan, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Boe, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Thorsnes, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Buhl-Mortensen, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Buhl-Mortensen, L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Active venting system offshore northern Norway</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>89</VOLUME><NUMBER>29</NUMBER><PAGES>261-268</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>hydrothermal vents</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>A combined sediment-sampling, highresolution&#xD;seismic, multiple echo sounder,&#xD;and video survey was conducted offshore&#xD;Vester&#xE5;len, northern Norway, in October&#xD;2007 as part of the ongoing Marine Area&#xD;Database for Norwegian Coast and Oceanic&#xD;Regions ( MAREANO) program. MAREANO&#xD;is a multidisciplinary seabed mapping program&#xD;conducting physical, biological, and&#xD;environmental mapping in the Lofoten/&#xD;southern Barents Sea area. Data and analysis&#xD;arising from this program will provide the&#xD;basis for ecosystem- based management of&#xD;Norway&#x2019;s coastal and offshore regions. The&#xD;survey used multicorer, box corer, and grab&#xD;samplers; a TOPAS parametric subbottom profiler;&#xD;18-, 38-, 70-, 120-, 200-, and 400- kilohertz&#xD;echo sounders; and a CAMPOD camera&#xD;system with two video cameras and lights&#xD;mounted on an aluminum frame</ABSTRACT><NOTES>norway_venting.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003644</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Christophides, V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Houstis, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lalis, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tsalapata, H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Ontology-driven integration of scientific repositories</TITLE><PAGES>1-13</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>unpublished?</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>unpublished manuscript</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ontology, controlled vocabulary, MMI, marine metadata</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>There is an increasing need to provide scientists and researchers as well as policy makers and the general public with value-added services integrating information spread over distributed heterogeneous repositories. In order to incorporate available data sets and scientific programs into a powerful information and computational system it is mandatory to identify and exploit their semantic relationship. For this purpose, we advocate an ontological framework that captures these relations and allows the inference of valid combinations of scientific resources for the production of new data. We show how a knowledge base that commits to an ontology can be used to generate workflows on demand for the multiplicity of resources known to the system. To validate our ideas, we are currently developing a prototype for the area of Coastal Zone Management.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>PDF Journal Articles - ontology.doc</NOTES><URL>http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/publications/paperlink/ontology.doc</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003096</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Cimino, J. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pruett, L. T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Palmer, H. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>Management of global maritime limits and boundaries using geographical information systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Integ. Coastal Zone Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>91-97</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Integrated Coastal Zone Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>maritime boundaries, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file maritime.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002076</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Clark, J. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1996</YEAR><TITLE>Integrated coastal zone management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technology</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>37</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>55, 57, 59</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>A worldwide challenge toc omprehend-shorleine and coastal waters as a single unit</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004366</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Coleman, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Research review of collaborative ecosystem-based management in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>36</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>484-494</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>California Current Large Marine Ecosystem; CCEBM Initiative; ecosystem-based management; Sea Grant; West Coast Governors&apos; Agreement; EBM, marine reserves, marine protected areas, MPA, ecosystem-based management; ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The welfare of the marine environment is threatened worldwide. In order to maintain ecosystem services management must shift from single sector to ecosystem approaches. To support this transition in marine management, this article reviews collaborative ecosystem-based management in the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem (CCLME), through an overview and comparison of three collaborations on the United States West Coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. The achievements of these collaborations are demonstrated. Networking and extending collaboration throughout the entire region is shown to be essential for environmental conservation and sustainable development in the CCLME.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>CCLME.pdf&#xD;See list of references for good leads, background</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003496</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Comber, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fisher, P. and Raper, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wadsworth, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Integrating land-cover data with different ontologies: Identifying change from inconsistency</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>18</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>691-708</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ontology, controlled vocabulary, Oregon Coastal Atlas</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Spatially coincident land-cover information frequently varies due to&#xD;technological and political variations. This is especially problematic for timeseries&#xD;analyses. We present an approach using expert expressions of how the&#xD;semantics of different datasets relate to integrating temporal time series landcover&#xD;information where the classification classes have fundamentally changed.&#xD;We use land-cover mapping in the UK (LCMGB and LCM2000) as example&#xD;data sets because of the extensive object-based meta-data in the LCM2000.&#xD;Inconsistencies between the two datasets can arise from random, gross and&#xD;systematic error and from an actual change in land cover. Locales of possible&#xD;land-cover change are inferred by comparing characterizations derived from the&#xD;semantic relations and meta-data. Field visits showed errors of omission to&#xD;be 21% and errors of commission to be 28%, despite the accuracy limitations of&#xD;the land-cover information when compared with the field survey component of&#xD;the Countryside Survey 2000.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the pdf file - landcover_ontologies.pdf - in Irish_Fulbright folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004242</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Comber, A. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fisher, P. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wadsworth, R. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Semantics, metadata, geographical information and users</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>287-291</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>editorial</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic properties of metadata</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Semantics is concerned with analysing the meaning encoded in language (Calvani 2004).&#xD;Within a technical description of data, semantic descriptions ought to be an important&#xD;adjunct, filling out the labels and codings of classes and providing justification for&#xD;measurements. Semantics are equally applicable whether applied to single word labels&#xD;(Building, Tree, etc.), short phrases (coniferous forest, upland moors, etc.), or to longer&#xD;textual descriptions of a phenomenon. Data semantics also includes the general description&#xD;of a dataset and its characteristics and limitations.&#xD;Spatial data and their semantics vary for a variety of reasons that are not to do with&#xD;differences in the feature being measured. In the creation of any spatial data there are a&#xD;series of choices about what to map and how to map it which will depend on a range&#xD;of commissioning and institutional factors. Different choices result in different&#xD;representations and variation between datasets. The variability between different, but&#xD;equally valid, mappings of the same real world objects ultimately points to the social&#xD;construction of spatial data (Harvey and Chrisman 1998). Much valuable geographical&#xD;information is therefore embedded in its semantics.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;semantics_metadata.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003308</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Cowell, P. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zeng, T. Q.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Integrating uncertainty theories with GIS for modeling coastal hazards of climate change</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>5-18</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS, coastal hazard, climate change, uncertainty, random simulation, fuzzy set, differential method, DEM remapping</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - uncertainty_coastal_hazard.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004350</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Craglia, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Goodchild, M. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Annoni, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Camara, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gould, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kuhn, W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mark, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Masser, I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Maguire, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Liang, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Parsons, E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Next-generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>3</VOLUME><PAGES>146-167</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Digital Earth, spatial data infrastructures, Earth Observation,</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>GEOSS, geobrowsers, voluntary geographic information, ontology, virtual globe, digital globe</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This position paper is the outcome of a joint reflection by a group of international&#xD;geographic and environmental scientists from government, industry, and&#xD;academia brought together by the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of&#xD;Geographic Information Science, and the Joint Research Centre of the European&#xD;Commission. It argues that the vision of Digital Earth put forward by Vice-&#xD;President Al Gore 10 years ago needs to be re-evaluated in the light of the many&#xD;developments in the fields of information technology, data infrastructures, and&#xD;earth observation that have taken place since. It focuses the vision on the nextgeneration&#xD;Digital Earth and identifies priority research areas to support this&#xD;vision. The paper is offered as input for discussion among different stakeholder&#xD;communities with the aim to shape research and policy over the next 5-10 years.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>GIScience2008--&gt;Virtual_Globes_Panel--&gt;digital_earth_posn_paper.pdf&#xD;VERY important paper!</NOTES><URL>http://dx.doi.org/10.2902/1725-0463.2008.03.art9</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003685</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Crawford, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kasmidi, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Korompis, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pollnac, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Factors influending progress in establishing community-based marine protected areas in Indonesia</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>39-64</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>community-based; community organizer; Indonesia; marine protected areas</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT> Concerns are being raised about high failure rates of community-based small-scale no-take marine reserves that are proliferating in the Southeast Asian region. Factors hypothesized to influence success include intrinsic community characteristics, project input levels, and change agent characteristics. An empirical analysis of these hypotheses was conducted using a sample of 24 villages in North Sulawesi, Indonesia, where marine reserves were in early phases of establishment. Factors found to influence the rate of progress were village complexity, level of development, project input levels, characteristics of community organizers, and degree of community organizer homophily relative to the community. These findings are important for community-based marine conservation initiatives conducting simultaneous interventions in multiple communities. It provides insights in how project strategies can be adjusted to increase the probability of success, obtain economies of scale, target communities more amenable to community-based interventions and result in a better return on project investments.</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003497</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Crompvoets, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bregt, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rajabifard, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Williamson, I.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>18</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>665-689</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>clearinghouses, SDI, Oregon Coastal Atlas, spatial data infrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Many countries have spent considerable resources over the past few&#xD;years debating optimal national spatial data infrastructures. One of the (main)&#xD;elements of these infrastructures is the national spatial data clearinghouse, which&#xD;facilitates access to required spatial data and provides complementary services.&#xD;With this in mind, in April 2000, 2001, 2002 and December 2000, 2001, 2002, a&#xD;web survey was carried out to assess systematically the developments of these&#xD;national clearinghouses worldwide. Regarding the development in the number of&#xD;implementations, it can be considered a worldwide success. However, of concern&#xD;are the declining trends in use, management and content. One of the main&#xD;reasons for these negative trends could be the dissatisfaction of the spatial data&#xD;community with the functional capability of current clearinghouses. The&#xD;functional capabilities of clearinghouses should likely be changed from a&#xD;data-oriented to a user and application-oriented focus. This is in accord with the&#xD;objectives of the second generation of spatial data infrastructures. The main&#xD;factors, therefore, that will have positive impacts on developments in this field&#xD;are the inclusion of web services, stability of funding and creation of userfriendly&#xD;interfaces.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the pdf file - spatial_data_chouses.pdf - in Irish_Fulbright folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003188</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Crosby, M. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Brighouse, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pichon, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Priorities and strategies for addressing natural and anthropogenic threats to coral reefs in Pacific Island Nations</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><NUMBER>2-3</NUMBER><PAGES>121-137</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef conservation, sanctuaries, SSE, American Samoa, Participatory Island Ecosystem Management System (PIEMS), case study</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf - OCM_coral.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://dusk.geo.orst.edu/djl/samoa/links.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>2</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004046</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Cumming, G. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Understanding the Decision-Making Capacity of Oregon Coastal Watershed Councils</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>MAIS-Political Science, Sociology, Philosophy</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Corvallis, OR</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Oregon State University</PUBLISHER><PAGES>171</PAGES><TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TERTIARY_AUTHOR>Bill Lunch</TERTIARY_AUTHOR></TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TYPE_OF_WORK>Master Thesis</TYPE_OF_WORK><ABSTRACT>In 1995, Oregon introduced the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds (formerly the Oregon Coho Salmon Recovery Initiative; OCRSI), a statewide cooperative effort between government and citizens. The Oregon Plan promotes voluntary and locally determined salmonid and watershed restoration initiatives. Watershed councils - groups comprised of citizens, federal and state agencies, local government, industry, advocacy groups, and local business - use cooperation, collaboration, and consensus to develop solutions unique to their salmon and watershed issues. Watershed councils bear much of the responsibility for improving Oregon salmon populations and watershed health. Because salmon and watershed rehabilitation takes place in a complex decision-making environment, watershed councils need to be effective in identifying, developing, implementing, and monitoring multiple rehabilitation projects, at times simultaneously. Watershed council success, in large part, depends on councils having the right human and nonhuman resources available to accomplish salmon and watershed rehabilitation goals. A recent study of 15 coastal Oregon watershed councils revealed interesting dynamics associated with watershed council structure and process differentiated by the physical size of the watershed, watershed landowner dynamics, and watershed population. Observations, interviews, surveys and content analysis reveal that the physical size of a watershed, which is related to landownership, land use, and urban versus rural population distribution dynamics, also has direct impacts on how the watershed council functions. Perhaps, very few watershed council members are aware of the potential limitations or advantages these factors present for individual watershed councils in relationship to salmon and watershed rehabilitation efforts. The authors also found significant differences between large and small watersheds on select factors including member affiliation, membership rules, decision-making authority, member relationships, and watershed council process. These factors show markedly different watershed council characteristics; this may result in equally different approaches to restoration and rehabilitation.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>PDF_Journal_Articles --&gt; cumming_thesis.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/dspace/handle/1957/6884</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002544</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>D&apos;Avello, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Windhorn, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Bathmaster: An automated system for bathymetric mapping</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geo Info Systems</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>8</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>16-18</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geo Info Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>bathymetry, shoreline, USGS, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), lakes, coastal, oceanography and GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003983</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>D&apos;iorio, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jupiter, S. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cochran, S. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Potts, D. C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE><styles><style face='2' start='107'></style><style start='124'></style></styles>Optimizing remote sensing and GIS tools for mapping and managing the distribution of an invasive mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) on south Molokai, Hawaii</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>125-144</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, AVIRIS, ASTER, aerial photography, habitat mapping, classification accuracy, alien species management, red mangrove, ANOVA, satellite remote sensing</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>In 1902, the Florida red mangrove, Rhizophora mangle L., was introduced to the&#xD;island of Molokai, Hawaii, and has since colonized nearly 25% of the south coast&#xD;shoreline. By classifying three kinds of remote sensing imagery, we compared abilities to&#xD;detect invasive mangrove distributions and to discriminate mangroves from surrounding&#xD;terrestrial vegetation. Using three analytical techniques, we compared mangrove&#xD;mapping accuracy for various sensor-technique combinations. ANOVA of accuracy&#xD;assessments demonstrated significant differences among techniques, but no significant&#xD;differences among the three sensors. We summarize advantages and disadvantages&#xD;of each sensor and technique for mapping mangrove distributions in tropical coastal&#xD;environments.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Marine_Geodesy_MCGIS5/RS_hab_molokai.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003890</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dalton, T. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Exploring participants&apos; views of participatory coastal and marine resource management processes</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><PAGES>351-367</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>public participation, stakeholder involvement, process</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>It is generally accepted that stakeholders, including resource users, scientists,&#xD;conservationists, government and nongovernment organizations, and the general&#xD;public, can contribute positively to management processes and may even benefit&#xD;from such processes. However, we continue to struggle with how to design processes&#xD;that effectively involve these stakeholders. To illuminate potential improvements&#xD;to traditional processes, this study examines participants&#x2019; perceptions of coastal&#xD;and marine resource management processes. Through semi-structured interviews,&#xD;respondents describe how they feel about various elements of participatory processes.&#xD;Responses offer insight into the multiple dimensions of participatory process elements&#xD;described in the literature, such as influence on decisions, exchange of information,&#xD;access to the process, transparent decision making, and others. Responses also identify&#xD;additional elements that have received limited attention in the public-participation&#xD;literature: hosting meetings at various scales, recognizing differences within interest&#xD;groups, and considering the context of a process. Results from this study will help to&#xD;inform the design of participatory coastal and marine resource management processes.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>participatory_coastal.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002909</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dalzell, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>The role of archaeological and cultural-historical records in long-range coastal fisheries resources management strategies and policies in the Pacific Islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>237-252</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Melanesia</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002810</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dalzell, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>The role of archaeological and cultural-historical records in long-range coastal fisheries resources management strategies and policies in the Pacific Islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>237-252</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine resource management, southwest Pacific, MRM, sabbatical</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder - &quot;MRM papers&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002758</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Daniels, R. C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1996</YEAR><TITLE>An innovative method of model integration to forecast spatial patterns of shoreline change: A case study of Nags Head, North Carolina</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Prof. Geog.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>48</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>195-209</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>The Professional Geographer</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>shoreline change, coastal GIS, GIS and oceanography, coastal and marine, CoMa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003171</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Daniels, R. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Huxford, R. H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2001</YEAR><TITLE>An error assessment of vector data derived form scanned National Ocean Service topographic sheets</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Coastal Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>17</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>611-619</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Coastal Research</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>National Ocean Service, U.S. Coastal &amp; Geodetic Survey, histroical shoreline delineation, shorelines position, mean high water line, Oregon, Washington</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Red folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002141</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Davis, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tisdell, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Recreational scuba-diving and carrying capacity in marine protected areas</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>19-40</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean and Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003620</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Davisdson, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Renewable Natural Resources Foundation</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Building capacity for coastal solutions</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Renewable Res. J.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>23</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>1-32</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean and coastal management, resource management, understanding coastal problems, national needs for coastal mapping and charting, Congress on Building Capacity for Coastal Solutions</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>capacity4coastal_solns.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002138</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>De Fontaubert, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>United Nations global conference on the sustainable development of small island developing states</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>24</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>205-214</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean and Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003735</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>De Man, W. H. E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Understanding SDI; complexity and institutionalization</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>20</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>329-343</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SDI, spatial data infrastructure, socio-technical systems, actor-network theory, community of practice, complexity, institutionalization, duality of technology, Irish, Ireland; Francis Harvey, Ian Masser</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004008</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dean, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Characterizing spatial databases via their derivation: A complement to content ontologies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>399-412</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>Developing an ontology that succinctly describes the contents of a spatial database&#xD;is a very difficult undertaking. Yet most current efforts to develop spatial ontologies&#xD;remain focused on describing content. Ontologies describing other aspects of spatial&#xD;databases may prove to be much easier to develop and nearly as useful as content&#xD;ontologies, and yet these alternative ontologies have received little attention from&#xD;the research community. This paper explores one such alternative, specifically, an&#xD;ontology that describes how a spatial database may have been derived. Derivation&#xD;ontologies are shown to be highly complementary to content ontologies, and in some&#xD;cases can perform nearly identical tasks. It is also shown that derivation ontologies&#xD;are much more straightforward to develop than are content ontologies. Finally, we&#xD;present a genetic programming (GP)-based approach to automatically developing&#xD;derivation ontologies for existing databases. It is concluded that while derivation&#xD;ontologies cannot replace content ontologies, they are a useful and practical complement&#xD;that offer their own unique set of strengths to the problem of semantically&#xD;characterizing spatial data.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; content_ontologies.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004007</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Delboni, T. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Borges, K. A. V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Laender, A. H. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Davis, C. A., Jr.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Semantic expansion of geographic web queries based on natural language positioning expressions</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>377-398</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>The need for better Web search tools is getting increasing attention nowadays. About&#xD;20% of the queries currently submitted to search engines include geographic&#xD;references. Thus, it is particularly important to work with the semantics of such&#xD;queries, both by understanding the terminology and by recognizing geographic&#xD;references in natural language text. In this paper, we explore the use of natural&#xD;language expressions, which we call&#xD;positioning expressions&#xD;, to perform geographic&#xD;searches on the Web, without resorting to geocoded data or gazetteers. Such&#xD;positioning expressions denote the location of a subject of interest with respect to a&#xD;landmark. Our approach leads to a query expansion technique that can be explored&#xD;by virtually any keyword-based search engine. Results obtained in our experiments&#xD;show an expressive improvement over the traditional keyword-based search and a&#xD;potential path for tackling many kinds of common geographic queries.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; natural_language.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003997</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Deliiska, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Thesaurus and domain ontology of geoinformatics</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>637-652</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network, Arctic, semantic, ontology, controlled vocabulary</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Geoinformatics is a comparatively new interdisciplinary science and as a part of space&#xD;informatics uses methods and terminology of informatics and many natural sciences.&#xD;An ontology of geoinformatics is discussed in the paper, especially concerning its structure,&#xD;relationships with other ontologies, resources for development and utilization. The&#xD;ontology of geoinformatics is a kind of domain ontology and has a layered structure&#xD;consisting of syntactic and semantic layers. The corpus of this ontology is an existing&#xD;multilingual dictionary of geographical information systems (GIS) enriched with&#xD;terminology from other external sources. The building of the ontology is preceded&#xD;by the development of a taxonomy and thesaurus of geoinformatics. The thesaurus&#xD;database is converted into an OWL ontology by a Visual Basic application. The&#xD;reusing of the ontology is proposed by its transformation in application ontologies&#xD;for geoinformatics education.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;ontology_of_geoinformatics.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>1</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002662</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>United Nations Conference on Environment and Development</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>Agenda 21: Programme of Action fo Sustainable Development, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Statement of Forest Principles</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>New York</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>United Nations Department of Public Information</PUBLISHER><PAGES>294</PAGES><LABEL>HC 79 .E5 U5441 1992</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean GIS, coastal/marine GIS, GIS and oceanography, island GIS, UN, sustainable development</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004309</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Diaz, R. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rosenberg, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Science</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>321</VOLUME><PAGES>926-929</PAGES><DATE>15 August 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>hypoxia, eutrophication</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Dead zones in the coastal oceans have spread exponentially since the 1960s and have serious&#xD;consequences for ecosystem functioning. The formation of dead zones has been exacerbated by the&#xD;increase in primary production and consequent worldwide coastal eutrophication fueled by riverine&#xD;runoff of fertilizers and the burning of fossil fuels. Enhanced primary production results in an&#xD;accumulation of particulate organic matter, which encourages microbial activity and the consumption of&#xD;dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. Dead zones have now been reported from more than 400 systems,&#xD;affecting a total area of more than 245,000 square kilometers, and are probably a key stressor&#xD;on marine ecosystems.&#xD;The visible ecosystem response to eutrophication&#xD;is the greening of the water column&#xD;as the algae and vegetation in coastal areas&#xD;grow in direct response to nutrient enrichment.&#xD;The most serious threat from eutrophication is the&#xD;unseen decrease in dissolved oxygen (DO) levels&#xD;in bottom waters, created as planktonic algae&#xD;die and add to the flow of organic matter to the&#xD;seabed to fuel microbial respiration (1). Hypoxia&#xD;occurs when DO falls below &#x2264;2 ml of O2/liter,&#xD;at which point benthic fauna show aberrant&#xD;behavior&#x2014;for example, abandoning burrows for&#xD;exposure at the sediment-water interface, culminating&#xD;in mass mortality when DO declines below&#xD;0.5 ml of O2/liter (2). In most cases, hypoxia&#xD;is associated with a semi-enclosed hydrogeomorphology&#xD;that, combined with water-column stratification,&#xD;restricts water exchange. More recently,&#xD;dead zones have developed in continental seas,&#xD;such as the Baltic, Kattegat, Black Sea, Gulf of&#xD;Mexico, and East China Sea, all of which are&#xD;major fishery areas.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>dead_zones.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003266</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dobson, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Geographer questioned at pearly gates</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GEOWorld</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>15</VOLUME><NUMBER>9</NUMBER><PAGES>26-27</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GEOWorld</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>teaching, GEO 580, GEO 465/565, what is geography, GIS, GPS, cartography, topology, ontology</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001747</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dobson, J. E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>International conferences address GIS in coastal zone management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GIS World</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GIS World</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>8</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>42-43</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal GIS, Darius Bartlett, CoastGIS &apos;95, coastal zone management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004337</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Doctorow, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Welcome to the Petacentre</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>16-21</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, data management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>What does it take to store bytes by the tens of thousands of&#xD;trillions? Cory Doctorow meets the people and machines for&#xD;which it&#x2019;s all in a day&#x2019;s work.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_petacenter.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004387</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Dodge, R. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Birkeland, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hatziolos, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kleypas, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Palumbi, S. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hoegh-Guldberg, O.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Van Woesik, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ogden, J. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Aronson, R. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Causey, B. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Staub, F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>A call to action for coral reefs</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Science</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>322</VOLUME><PAGES>189-190</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Letter</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef, conservation</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>AT THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CORAL REEF&#xD;Symposium (ICRS) held in July in Fort&#xD;Lauderdale, Florida, midway through the&#xD;International Year of the Reef, more than&#xD;3500 experts from 75 countries assembled to&#xD;face some hard truths: Coral reefs are teetering&#xD;on the edge of survival, and it is our fault.&#xD;High levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere&#xD;can produce a lethal combination of&#xD;warmer seawater and lower pH. Pervasive overfishing, pollution, coastal development,&#xD;and physical damage further undermine reef&#xD;health&#x2014;and consequently the health of the&#xD;people and ecosystems depending upon&#xD;them (1).&#xD;Only by taking bold and urgent steps now&#xD;can we hope to ensure that reefs will survive&#xD;to enrich life on Earth, as they have for millions&#xD;of years before us. By failing to act, we&#xD;risk bequeathing an impoverished ocean to&#xD;our children and future generations (2).</ABSTRACT><NOTES>coral_call_to_action.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002588</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Doyle, E. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>van Dokkum, H. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vermulst, C. J. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Anderson, D. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mossa, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Device for sampling unconsolidated soft-bottom sediments in moderately deep waters</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Environ. Qual.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>24</VOLUME><PAGES>786-788</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Environmental Quality</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>core sampling, coastal and marine geography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder &quot;Mossa&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003250</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ducrotoy, J.-P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Shastri, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Williams, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal sciences and management: The need for networking in higher education</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>43</VOLUME><PAGES>427-444</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>education, network learning, oceanography, teaching, MRM</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Pile of papers under Snoopy paperweight</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003349</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Editors</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Acronyms and abbreviations</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>965-972</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean regions, regionalization, regional seas, a regional seas dossier</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><URL>I have the pdf file - regional_seas_acronyms.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003352</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Editors</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Websites</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>973-974</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean regions, regionalization, regional seas, a regional seas dossier</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><URL>I have the pdf file - regional_seas_web.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003539</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Edsel, B. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Abkowitz, M. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Predicting storm-induced beach erosion in Caribbean small islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>33</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>53-69</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>integrated coastal zone management (ICZM), beach erosion, beach erosion</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>models, geographic information systems (GIS), Caribbean small islands (CSI),</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Southeast Peninsula (SEP). GIS and oceanography, MRM, tsunami?</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - caribb_GIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>10</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003993</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ehler, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Douvere, F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Visions for a Sea Change. Report of the First International Workshop on Marine Spatial Planning</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Paris</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Intergovernmental&#xD;Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme, IOC Manual and Guides, 46: ICAM Dossier, 3. Paris: UNESCO</PUBLISHER><PAGES>84 pp.</PAGES><ISBN>IOC Manual and Guides, 46: ICAM Dossier, 3</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network, Arctic, marine spatial planning, ocean planning, GIS and oceanography, workshop</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>marine_spatial_planning.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003763</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Eikaas, H. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McIntosh, A. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kliskey, A. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Analysis of patterns in diadromous fish distributions using GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>10</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>469-484</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, fisheries GIS, oceanography and GIS, aquatic</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Understanding the factors limiting migratory behaviour is fundamental to conservation&#xD;of diadromous fish. Applications of indices of habitat suitability are problematic for&#xD;diadromous fish because fish presence and abundance in relation to habitat quality&#xD;are confounded by barriers to fish migration. An alternative approach is to assess&#xD;diadromous fish distributions in proportion to distance inland and altitude above&#xD;mean sea level, and subsequently generate trajectories for the various species. This&#xD;approach, however, may be problematic. We show that river distance inland and&#xD;elevation are only weakly correlated in our study area. Thus, in areas where steep&#xD;slopes are not encountered, fish migrations to significant elevations and inland&#xD;distances can be expected. In other areas, coastal cliffs and geologic fault lines provide&#xD;for steep stream gradients close to the sea, and fish do not migrate far inland. To&#xD;solve this issue, we developed methods for improving species trajectory approaches&#xD;to explain the distribution of diadromous fish using a GIS. We adjusted distance and&#xD;altitude categories so that each stratum was represented by the same number of site&#xD;records, with flexible intervals for each stratum. For species capable of forming landlocked&#xD;populations we manipulated input values for elevation and river distance&#xD;inland to account for migrations from lakes, rather than sea. Additionally, a new&#xD;GIS derived variable was introduced to better explain the distribution of diadromous&#xD;fish; the maximum stream slope a fish would encounter during upstream migration.&#xD;This new slope variable, independent of distance inland and elevation, is likely to be&#xD;a better predictor of migratory fish occurrences than elevation above mean sea level,&#xD;as the different species will have different slope-thresholds that they can overcome.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;diadromous_fish.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>2</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002912</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Eleveld, M. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Exploring Coastal Morphodynamics of Ameland (the Netherlands) with Remote Sensing Monitoring Techniques and Dynamic Modelling in GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Internatinal Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC)</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>University of Amsterdam</PUBLISHER><PAGES>225</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Ph.D.</TYPE_OF_WORK><LABEL>ISBN 90-6461-166-7</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the dissertation</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003387</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Eleveld, M. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schrimpf, W. B. H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Siegert, A. G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>User requirements and information definition for a virtual coastal and marine data warehouse</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>46</VOLUME><PAGES>487-505</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>clearinghouse, Oregon Coastal Atlas, information management, CoastBase</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - Virtual_warehouse.pdf - OCA folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004167</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Elwood, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: Challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>22</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>71-90</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>PPGIS; Spatial data infrastructures; Local knowledge; Data sharing, UCGIS virtual seminar</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper investigates the unique challenges of an expanding group of&#xD;stakeholders making demands upon shared geospatial data resources: non&#xD;governmental organisations participating in local governance. In spite of efforts&#xD;to improve local data integration in spatial data infrastructures and development&#xD;of strategies from public participation GIS to expand access to geospatial data&#xD;and technologies, grassroots data users still experience difficulties with the&#xD;accessibility, quality, and usefulness of local government data resources. Drawing&#xD;from extended ethnographic research conducted in Chicago, Illinois, I illustrate&#xD;these problems and how they are shaped by grassroots groups&#x2019; resource&#xD;constraints, knowledge systems, and socio-political positions; and assess the&#xD;feasibility and impacts of proposed alternatives for better meeting grassroots&#xD;spatial data needs. I contend that the needs and challenges of these stakeholders&#xD;are unique from those of other users, but are nonetheless rooted in central&#xD;dilemmas of spatial data handling, and so might be addressed through stronger&#xD;engagement with GIScience research in this arena.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>SDI_stakeholders.pdf and grassroots_GIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003180</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fabrikant, S. I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Buttenfield, B. P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2001</YEAR><TITLE>Formalizing semantic spaces for information access</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Annals AAG</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>91</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>263-280</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>information retrieval, geography of Cyberspace, web GIS, semantic information spaces, spatial metaphors, spatialization, visualization, teaching?, GEO 580?</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004316</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fenner, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Speicher, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gulick, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Aeby, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Aletto, S. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Anderson, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Carroll, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>DiDonato, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>DiDonato, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Farmer, V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gove, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Houk, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lundblad, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nadon, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Riolo, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sabater, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schroeder, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Smith, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tuitele, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tagarino, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vaitautolu, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vaoli, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vargas-Angel, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vroom, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The state of coral reef ecosystems of American Samoa</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2008. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 73.</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Silver Spring, MD</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>NOAA/NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment&#x2019;s Biogeography Team</PUBLISHER><PAGES>307-351</PAGES><TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TERTIARY_AUTHOR>Waddell, J. E.</TERTIARY_AUTHOR><TERTIARY_AUTHOR>Clarke, A. M.</TERTIARY_AUTHOR></TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TERTIARY_TITLE>The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States</TERTIARY_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef, Coral Reef Ecosystem Data-Gathering Activities and Resource Condition </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Water Quality and Oceanographic Conditions </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Benthic Habitats </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Associated Biological Communities </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Current Conservation Management Activities</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Samoa_Latest--&gt;Am_Samoa_Corals_NOAA</NOTES><URL>http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/ecosystems/coralreef/coral2008/landing.html &#xD;http://www.coralreef.noaa.gov&#xD;http://www.coris.noaa.gov</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>10</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003680</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fiez, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>North Coast Basin Prototype Website: Project Completion Report</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Corvallis, OR</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Institute for Natural Resources, Oregon State University</PUBLISHER><PAGES>30</PAGES><DATE>February 28, 2005</DATE><TYPE_OF_WORK>internal project report</TYPE_OF_WORK><SHORT_TITLE>North Coast Explorer</SHORT_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>North Coast Explorer</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Oregon Coastal Atlas, OCA, web mapping, tool suite, coastal GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>north_coast_explorer.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://northcoastexplorer.info</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003988</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fletcher, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Introduction to the theme issue: The role of geography in contemporary coastal management policy and practice</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>413-417</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal policy; coastal practice; geography; integrated coastal management; integrated coastal zone management (ICZM)</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This article provides a brief introduction to the theme issue on &quot;The role of geography in contemporary coastal management policy and practice.&quot; The theme is addressed through a suite of seven articles that collectively consider how geographical understandings and methods relate to contemporary coastal policy and practice. The key theme to emerge from the articles is that geography forms an underlying framework for considering integrated coastal management, largely due to the integrative nature of geography itself.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>geog_CZM2.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003991</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fletcher, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Potts, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Ocean citizenship: An emergent geographical concept</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>511-524</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>citizenship; geography; Integrated Coastal Management; National Maritime Museum; ocean citizenship</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Ocean citizenship describes a relationship between our everyday lives and the health of the coastal and marine environment. Through our everyday lives we affect, and are affected by, the marine and coastal environment in numerous ways. As such, individuals have a responsibility to make informed lifestyle choices to minimize this impact. In doing so, the actions of individuals can contribute to the amelioration of large-scale and seemingly insurmountable geographical problems. This article outlines the concept of ocean citizenship within the context of the public understanding of marine environmental issues. The article draws heavily on the experience of the National Maritime Museum as an important contributor to the development of ocean citizenship in the United Kingdom. Specifically, the Planet Ocean initiative will be examined, in which the Museum has adopted a multimodal approach to public engagement through exhibitions, educational resources, and specific research publications. The article concludes by highlighting the importance of geography in the development and sustainability of ocean citizenship.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>ocean_citizenship.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003987</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fletcher, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Smith, H. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Geography and coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>419-427</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coast; coastal management; geography; integrated coastal management; integrated coastal zone management (ICZM)</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This article presents an overview of the relationship between geography and coastal management. It explores the nature of geography as well as the geographical underpinnings of key notions within coastal management, in particular, &quot;coast,&quot; &quot;conflict,&quot; and &quot;integration.&quot; The article considers the integrated coastal management process and tracks the influence of geography on the development of the discipline&apos;s theory and practice, as well as its academic infrastructure. The article concludes that although geography both underpins and offers useful insights into coastal management, a challenge remains to explore in greater depth the benefits of applied geographical approaches to the management of coasts.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>geog_CZM2.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003097</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Flood, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>Airborne laser altimetry: A cost effective tool for mapping coastal zone topography</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Integ. Coastal Zone Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>179-183</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Integrated Coastal Zone Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>LIDAR, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file lidar_czm.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004004</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fonseca, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rodriguez, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>From geo-pragmatics to derviation ontologies: New directions for the geospatial semantic web</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>313-317</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>guest editorial - special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>We currently have a wealth of geographic information on the Web that is available in&#xD;different forms ranging from images, maps, spatial databases, and tables to simple texts&#xD;such as informal city guides, description of landscapes, and reports of bird watching&#xD;activities. One of the most recent initiatives in trying to efficiently index, retrieve, and&#xD;integrate information on the Web is the Semantic Web (Berners-Lee et al. 2001). Berners-&#xD;Lee&#x2019;s initial example shows the relevance of geographic information: &#x201C;&#xD;At the doctor&#x2019;s&#xD;office, Lucy instructed her Semantic Web agent through her handheld Web browser.&#xD;The agent promptly retrieved information about Mom&#x2019;s prescribed treatment from the&#xD;doctor&#x2019;s agent, looked up several lists of providers, and checked for the ones in-plan for&#xD;Mom&#x2019;s insurance within a 20-mile radius of her home and with a rating of excellent or&#xD;very good on trusted rating services.&#xD;&#x201D; This vision will be put in practice with the implementation&#xD;of software agents that will talk with other agents in order to get the tasks&#xD;accomplished. For the agents to understand each other it is necessary to have ontologies&#xD;in place that will define the vocabulary for the agents. For instance, in the example,&#xD;one agent could have used &#x2018;close to&#x2019;, &#x2018;near&#x2019;, or &#x2018;within walking distance&#x2019; instead of&#xD;&#x2018;within a 20 miles radius&#x2019;, to achieve similar results. Ontologies provide precise definitions&#xD;and can be linked to different contexts so that these terms have precise meanings&#xD;that can be handled by the software agents.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; geopragmatic.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002975</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Fowler, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schmidt, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Geographic information systems, mapping, and spatial data for the coastal and ocean resource management community</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Surv. Land Inf. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>58</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>135-140</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Surveying and Land Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine and coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS, special issue, NOAA CSC</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004338</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Frankel, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Reid, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Distilling meaning from data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>30</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, data management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Buried in vast streams of data are clues to new science. But we may need to craft new&#xD;lenses to see them. &#xD;It is a breathtaking time in science&#xD;as masses of data pour in, promising&#xD;new insights. But how can&#xD;we find meaning in these terabytes?&#xD;To search successfully&#xD;for new science in large datasets, we must find&#xD;unexpected patterns and interpret evidence&#xD;in ways that frame new questions and suggest&#xD;further explorations. Old habits of representing&#xD;data can fail to meet these challenges, preventing&#xD;us from reaching beyond the familiar&#xD;questions and answers.&#xD;To extract new meaning&#xD;from the sea of data, scientists&#xD;have begun to embrace&#xD;the tools of visualization. Yet&#xD;few appreciate that visual representation&#xD;is also a form of&#xD;communication. A rich body&#xD;of communication expertise&#xD;holds the potential to greatly&#xD;improve these tools. We propose&#xD;that graphic artists, communicators&#xD;and visualization&#xD;scientists should be brought&#xD;into conversation with theorists&#xD;and experimenters&#xD;before all the data have been&#xD;gathered. If we design experiments&#xD;in ways that offer varied&#xD;opportunities for representing&#xD;and communicating data,&#xD;techniques for extracting new&#xD;understanding can be made&#xD;available.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_meaning.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003302</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Franklin, E. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ault, J. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Smith, S. G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Luo, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Meester, G. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Diaz, G. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Chiappone, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Swanson, D. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Miller, S. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bohnsack. J. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Benthic habitat mapping in the Tortugas region, Florida</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>19-34</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - benthic_hab_tortuga.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004101</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Friis-Christensen, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lutz, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ostl&#xE4;nder, N.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bernard, L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Designing service architectures for distributed geoprocessing: Challenges and future directions</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>799-818</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SDI, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, CMRC, NSDI, OGC, WMS, WFS, metadata, forest fire client, DHTML</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004079</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Gagnon, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Scheibling, R. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jones, W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tully, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>The role of digital bathymetry in mapping shallow marine vegetation from hyperspectral image data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Remote Sensing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>29</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>879-904</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Remote Sensing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Kyle</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Hyperspectral remote sensing is a proven technology for measurement of coastal ocean colour, including sea-bed mapping in optically shallow waters. Using hyperspectral imagery of shallow (&lt;15&#xA0;m deep) sea bed acquired with the Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI-550), we examined how changes in the spatial resolution of bathymetric grids, created from sonar data (echosounding) and input to conventional image classifiers, affected the accuracy of distributional maps of invasive (Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides) and native (kelp) seaweeds off the coast of Nova Scotia, Canada. The addition of a low-resolution bathymetric grid, interpolated from soundings by the Canadian Hydrographic Service, improved the overall classification accuracies by up to 10%. However, increasing the bathymetric resolution did not increase the accuracy of classification maps produced with the supervised (Maximum Likelihood) classifier as shown by a slightly lower accuracy (2%) when using an intermediate-resolution bathymetric grid interpolated from soundings with a recreational fish finder. Supervised classifications using the first three eigenvectors from a principal-components analysis were consistently more accurate (by at least 27%) than unsupervised (K-means classifier) schemes with similar data compression. With an overall accuracy of 76%, the most reliable scheme was a supervised classification with low-resolution bathymetry. However, the supervised approach was particularly sensitive, and variations in accuracy of 2% resulted in overestimations of up to 53% in the extent of C. fragile and kelp. The use of a passive optical bathymetric algorithm to derive a high-resolution bathymetric grid from the CASI data showed promise, although fundamental differences between this grid and those created with the sonar data limited the conclusions. The bathymetry (at any spatial resolution) appeared to improve the accuracy of the classifications both by reducing the confusion among the spectral classes and by removing noise in the image data. Variations in the accuracy of depth estimates and inescapable positional inaccuracies in the imagery and ground data largely accounted for the observed differences in the classification accuracies. This study provides the first detailed demonstration of the advantages and limitations of integrating digital bathymetry with hyperspectral data for the mapping of benthic assemblages in optically shallow waters.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>shallow_bathy_marine_veg.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002140</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Galdorisi, G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>The U.S. and the Law of the Sea--Time for an immediate decision</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>25</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>151-154</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean and Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004212</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Garcia, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tsinaraki, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Celma, O.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Christodoulakis, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Multimedia content description using semantic web languags</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Kompatsiaris, Y.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Hobson, P.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Semantic Multimedia and Ontologies: Theory and Applications</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Berlin</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Springer</PUBLISHER><PAGES>17-54</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>good introduction to OWL, RDF, ontology vocabulary and other features of the semantic web, ICAN</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This chapter describes the representation of multimedia content descriptions that&#xD;are structured according to the MPEG-7 metadata description model and expressed&#xD;using the Semantic Web languages. The rest of the chapter is structured as follows:&#xD;Section 2.2 provides an overview of MPEG-7. The general purpose approaches for&#xD;multimedia content description that are supported by the MPEG-7 standard are presented&#xD;as well as the limitations of the current MPEG-7 version (mainly a lack&#xD;of explicit semantics). Section 2.3 presents the existing web ontology languages,&#xD;while Section 2.4 outlines the efforts made to move the MPEG-7 standard into&#xD;the Semantic Web. In our case, this is accomplished by interpreting and expressing&#xD;the informal MPEG-7 semantics using Semantic Web languages. An approach for&#xD;mapping XML schema (Fallside 2001) constructs to OWL constructs (McGuinness&#xD;and van Harmelen 2004) is presented in Section 2.5, while Section 2.6 presents&#xD;two use cases that show the benefits of this approach, including semantic integration&#xD;and retrieval in the music domain. An integrated ontological infrastructure for&#xD;the semantic description of multimedia content is presented in Section 2.7. This&#xD;infrastructure allows for combining the general purpose MPEG-7 constructs with&#xD;domain and application-specific knowledge through the systematic representation&#xD;2 Multimedia Content Description 19&#xD;of this knowledge in the form of web ontology language (OWL) domain and application&#xD;ontologies integrated with the MPEG-7 semantics.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>semantic_multimedia.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004347</REFNUM><AUTHORS><styles><style face='1'></style></styles><AUTHOR>Geller, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Chun, S. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jung, Y.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Toward the semantic deep web</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Computer</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>41</VOLUME><NUMBER>9</NUMBER><PAGES>95-97</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computer</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Semantic Web, deep web, semantic crawlers, DataNet, deep web services, SOA, cyberinfrastructure, semantic deep web</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The Semantic Deep Web fuses aspects of the Semantic Web with the use of ontology-aware browsers to extract information from the Deep Web.&#xD;&#xD;The Semantic Deep Web integrates Semantic Web components with the employment of ontology-aware browsers to squeeze information out of the Deep Web, which is nonindexable, invisible, and concealed online content that is only accessible via Web services or Web-form interfaces, write New Jersey Institute of Technology professor James Geller and colleagues. &quot;The primary goals of the Semantic Deep Web are to access Deep Web data through various Web technologies and to realize the Semantic Web&apos;s vision by enriching ontologies using this data,&quot; the authors note. To access the Deep Web with Semantic Web technologies, the Semantic Deep Web utilizes ontology plug-in search, a method for enriching a domain ontology with Deep Web data semantics so that it can be used to refine user search queries processed by a conventional search. Another key Semantic Deep Web process is Deep Web service annotation, in which Deep Web services are annotated with Deep Web data semantics so that they can be searched by a Semantic Web search engine. It is simpler from a semantic perspective to obtain ontologies from Deep Web data sources, especially well-structured relational back-end databases, than from unstructured natural-language text documents. Activities Geller lists as necessary for fusing Semantic Web and Deep Web technologies together include the development of ontology-aware, high-quality Web search engines; construction of large ontologies from Deep Web sites, beginning with all e-commerce subdomains; achieving acceptance of an &quot;open source attitude&quot; in the e-commerce space to simplify the building of Deep Web ontologies by accessing securely locked data sources; creation of libraries of semantic crawlers designed to extract back-end database information; and assembly of comprehensive index structures for Deep Web sites.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>see also Wright, 2008, searching_deep_web.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www2.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MC.2008.402</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004339</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Goldston, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Data wrangling</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>15</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, data management, Congress</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Collecting and releasing environmental data have&#xD;stirred up controversy in Washington, says&#xD;David Goldston, and will continue to do so.&#xD;Data sound like a grey, nonpartisan&#xD;and unemotional&#xD;topic for political discussion.&#xD;But decisions on what data&#xD;to collect and release for use in research or policy-&#xD;making are hardly neutral in their impact.&#xD;This may be clearest in the arena of environmental&#xD;policy, where hard-fought disputes over the&#xD;collection and dissemination of data frequently&#xD;break out. Indeed, perhaps the only thing politicians&#xD;agree on about environmental data is that&#xD;more data are always better &#x2014; in theory.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_wrangling.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004324</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Goochild, M. F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Commentary: Whither VGI?</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GeoJournal</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>72</VOLUME><PAGES>239-244</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GeoJournal</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>privacy, volunteered geographic information, VGI</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>For the most part, we find our way around the planet&#xD;by tapping memory, perhaps by recalling past routes,&#xD;or sometimes by accessing stored mental images that&#xD;approximate maps. In other cases, however, we must&#xD;rely on information collected and made available to&#xD;us by others. People visiting strange cities need street&#xD;maps to help them find their way around; planners&#xD;need maps of wetlands and other constraints on&#xD;development; pilots need air navigation charts; children&#xD;need atlases and globes to learn about the&#xD;Earth&#x2019;s almost infinite variety; and emergency&#xD;responders need maps to plan systematic recovery&#xD;efforts. Geographic information, whether in the form&#xD;of maps, images, driving directions, or guidebooks is&#xD;increasingly essential to many aspects of human&#xD;existence.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>VGI--&gt;VGI_Goodchild.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002808</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Graham, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Idechong, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Reconciling customary and constitutional law: Managing marine resources in Palau, Micronesia</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>143-164</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine resource management, southwest Pacific, MRM, sabbatical</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder - &quot;MRM papers&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000000101</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Grant, J. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schreiber, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1990</YEAR><TITLE>Modern swathe sounding and sub-bottom profiling technology for research applications: The Atlas Hydrosweep and Parasound systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geophys. Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geophysical Researches</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><PAGES>9-19</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>swath sounding, narrow-beam sub-bottom profiling, acoustic surveying</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder, miscellaneous/technical</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003425</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Grantham, B. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Chan, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nielsen, K. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fox, D. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Barth, J. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Huyer, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lubchenco, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Menge, B. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Upwelling-driven nearshore hypoxia signals ecosystem and oceanographic changes in the northeast Pacific</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>429</VOLUME><PAGES>749-754</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Oregon hypoxia</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Seasonal development of dissolved-oxygen deficits (hypoxia)&#xD;represents an acute system-level perturbation to ecological&#xD;dynamics and fishery sustainability in coastal ecosystems around&#xD;the globe1&#x2013;3. Whereas anthropogenic nutrient loading has&#xD;increased the frequency and severity of hypoxia in estuaries&#xD;and semi-enclosed seas3,4, the occurrence of hypoxia in opencoast&#xD;upwelling systems reflects ocean conditions that control the&#xD;delivery of oxygen-poor and nutrient-rich deep water onto&#xD;continental shelves1. Upwelling systems support a large proportion&#xD;of the world&#x2019;s fisheries5, therefore understanding the&#xD;links between changes in ocean climate, upwelling-driven&#xD;hypoxia and ecological perturbations is critical. Here we report&#xD;on the unprecedented development of severe inner-shelf (&lt;70 m)&#xD;hypoxia and resultant mass die-offs of fish and invertebrates&#xD;within the California Current System. In 2002, cross-shelf transects&#xD;revealed the development of abnormally low dissolvedoxygen&#xD;levels as a response to anomalously strong flow of&#xD;subarctic water into the California Current System. Our findings&#xD;highlight the sensitivity of inner-shelf ecosystems to variation in&#xD;ocean conditions, and the potential impacts of climate change on&#xD;marine communities.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the pdf - oregon_hypoxia.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004120</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Gravestock, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Roberts, C. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bailey, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The income requirements of marine protected areas</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>272-283</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>MPA, marine protected area, marine reserve, impacts</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Given the growing impact of human activities on the sea, managers are increasingly turning to marine protected areas (MPAs) to&#xD;protect marine habitats and species. Many MPAs have been unsuccessful, however, and lack of income has been identified as a primary&#xD;reason for failure. In this study, data from a global survey of 79 MPAs in 36 countries were analysed and attempts made to&#xD;construct predictive models to determine the income requirements of any givenMPA. Statistical tests were used to uncover possible&#xD;patterns and relationships in the data, with two basic approaches. In the first of these, an attempt was made to build an explanatory&#xD;&#x2018;&#x2018;bottomeup&#x2019;&#x2019; model of the cost structures that might be required to pursue various management activities. This proved difficult in&#xD;practice owing to the very broad range of applicable data, spanning many orders of magnitude. In the second approach, a &#x2018;&#x2018;tope&#xD;down&#x2019;&#x2019; regression model was constructed using logarithms of the base data, in order to address the breadth of the data ranges. This&#xD;approach suggested that MPA size and visitor numbers together explained 46% of the minimum income requirements (p &lt; 0.001),&#xD;with area being the slightly more influential factor. The significance of area to income requirements was of little surprise, given its&#xD;profile in the literature. However, the relationship between visitors and income requirements might go some way to explaining why&#xD;northern hemisphere MPAs with apparently high incomes still claim to be under-funded. The relationship between running costs&#xD;and visitor numbers has important implications not only in determining a realistic level of funding for MPAs, but also in assessing from where funding might be obtained. Since a substantial proportion of the income of many MPAs appears to be utilized for amenity&#xD;purposes, a case may be made for funds to be provided from the typically better resourced government social and educational&#xD;budgets as well as environmental budgets. Similarly visitor fees, already an important source of funding for some MPAs, might have&#xD;a broader role to play in how MPAs are financed in the future.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>MPA_income.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003634</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Gregg, W. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Casey, N. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McClain, C. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Recent trends in global ocean chlorophyll</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geophys. Res. Ltr.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>32</VOLUME><NUMBER>L03606</NUMBER><PAGES>doi:10.1029/2004GL021808</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geophysical Research Letters</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>A 6-year time series of remotely-sensed global ocean&#xD;chlorophyll was evaluated using linear regression analysis to&#xD;assess recent trends. Global ocean chlorophyll has increased&#xD;4.1% (P &lt; 0.05). Most of the increase has occurred in coastal&#xD;regions, defined as bottom depth &lt; 200 m, where an increase&#xD;of 10.4% was observed. The main contributors to the&#xD;increase were the Patagonian Shelf, Bering Sea, and the&#xD;eastern Pacific, southwest African, and Somalian coasts.&#xD;Although the global open ocean exhibited no significant&#xD;change, 4 of the 5 mid-ocean gyres (Atlantic and Pacific)&#xD;showed declines in chlorophyll over the 6 years. In all but&#xD;the North Atlantic gyre, these were associated with&#xD;significant increases in sea surface temperature in at least&#xD;one season. These results suggest that changes are occurring&#xD;in the biology of the global oceans.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>global_chlorophyll.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002963</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Gregory, M. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Plastics and south Pacific island shores: Environmental implications</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>603-615</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE, Pacific islands, plastic litter, quantities, sources, environmental impact, solutions</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;&#xD;first page only</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003502</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Griggs, G. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Patsch, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Cliff erosion and bluff retreat along the California coast</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><NUMBER>9</NUMBER><PAGES>36-40</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Oregon Coastal Atlas, OCA, coastal erosion tool suite</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Coast of California caught between increasing numbers of people and ongoing process of shoreline retreat</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004153</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Grossner, K. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Goodchild, M. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Clarke, K. C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Defining a digital Earth system</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>145-160</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>digital Earth, 3D, 3-D, grand challenge</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>In a 1998 speech before the California Science Center in Los Angeles, then US Vice-President Al Gore called for a global undertaking to build a multi-faceted computing system for education and research, which he termed &quot;Digital Earth.&quot; The vision was that of a system providing access to what is known about the planet and its inhabitants&#x2019; activities &#x2013; currently and for any time in history &#x2013; via responses to queries and exploratory tools. Furthermore, it would accommodate modeling extensions for predicting future conditions. Organized efforts towards realizing that vision have diminished significantly since 2001, but progress on key requisites has been made. As the 10 year anniversary of that influential speech approaches, we re-examine it from the perspective of a systematic software design process and find the envisioned system to be in many respects inclusive of concepts of distributed geolibraries and digital atlases. A preliminary definition for a particular digital earth system as: &quot;a comprehensive, distributed geographic information and knowledge organization system,&quot; is offered and discussed. We suggest that resumption of earlier design and focused research efforts can and should be undertaken, and may prove a worthwhile &quot;Grand Challenge&quot; for the GIScience community.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Digital Earth ---&gt; defining_digital_earth.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004148</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Gruen, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Reality-based generation of virtual environments for digital Earth</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Digital Earth</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>88-106</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Digital Earth</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>photogrammetry; 3D modelling; digital terrain models; 3D city</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>modelling; cultural heritage; texture mapping; visualisation, 3-D, visualization, geovisualization</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Digital Earth essentially consists of 3D and moreD models and attached semantic&#xD;information (attributes). Techniques for generating such models efficiently are&#xD;required very urgently. Reality-based 3D modelling using images as prime data&#xD;source plays an important role in this context. Images contain a wealth of&#xD;information that can be advantageously used for model generation. Images are&#xD;increasingly available from satellite, aerial and terrestrial platforms. This&#xD;contribution briefly describes some of the problems which we encounter if the&#xD;process of model generation is to be automatised. With the help of some examples&#xD;from Digital Terrain Model generation, Cultural Heritage and 3D city modelling&#xD;we show briefly what can be achieved. Special attention is directed towards the&#xD;use of model helicopters for image data acquisition. Some problems with&#xD;interactive visualisation are discussed. Also, issues surrounding R&amp;D, professional&#xD;practice and education are also addressed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Digital Earth --&gt; digital_earth_viz.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=g790361682~db=all</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003886</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Guenette, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Alder, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Lessons from marine protected areas and integrated ocean management initiatives in Canada</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><PAGES>51-78</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Canada oceansAct, integratedmanagement, large ocean management areas,</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>marine protected areas</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>There is a wave of interest in Marine Protected Areas (MPA) and Integrated Management&#xD;(IM) as tools for addressing declines in marine environments through ecosystem-based&#xD;management. Lessons learned from seven MPA and two IM initiatives in Canada show&#xD;how engaging stakeholders results in: building and maintaining momentum through&#xD;social capital; using the collective knowledge of stakeholders; consensus through&#xD;formal and informal rules; and developing leadership capacity. However, as the number&#xD;of issues or the number of stakeholders increases&#x2014;especially where fisheries are&#xD;involved&#x2014;time, resources, and challenges in gaining support and participation increase.&#xD;Political and administrative obstacles and resistance to change still constitute much of&#xD;the challenge. Finally, funding and political commitment must be allocated from the&#xD;start; otherwise momentum stops and it is hard to regain even when funding becomes&#xD;available.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>MPA_initiatives_Canada.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003742</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Haddad, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wright, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Dailey, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Klarin, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Marra, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Dana, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Revell, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>The tools of the Oregon Coastal Atlas</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Wright, D. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Scholz, A. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Place Matters: Geospatial Tools for Marine Science, Conservation, and Management in the Pacific Northwest</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Corvallis, OR</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Oregon State University Press</PUBLISHER><PAGES>need page numbers</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><URL>http://www.ecotrust.org/placematters/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004118</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Halpern, B. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McLeod, K. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rosenberg, A. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Crowder, L. B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>203-211</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>EBM, marine reserves, marine protected areas, MPA, ecosystem-based management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Multiple activities affect the marine environment in concert, yet current management primarily considers activities in isolation.&#xD;A shift towards a more comprehensive management of these activities, as with recent emphasis on ecosystem-based approaches to&#xD;management, requires a means for evaluating their interactive and cumulative impacts. Here we develop a framework for this evaluation,&#xD;focusing on five core concepts: (1) activities have interactive and cumulative impacts, (2) management decisions require&#xD;consideration of, and tradeoffs among, all ecosystem services, (3) not all stressors are equal or have impacts that increase linearly,&#xD;(4) management must account for the different scales of activities and impacts, and (5) some externalities cannot be controlled locally&#xD;but must be accounted for in marine spatial planning. Comprehensive ocean zoning provides a powerful tool with which these&#xD;key concepts are collectively addressed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>EBM_ocean_zoning.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003924</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Halpin, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Roberts, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Best, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Moving marine ecosystem-based management forward</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Proceedings of the 27th Annual ESRI User Conference</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>San Diego, CA</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>ESRI</PUBLISHER><PAGES>Paper xxxx</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT> Successful implementation of marine ecosystem-based management (M-EBM) practices will require a diverse toolbox of novel, interoperable, and freely exchanged tools for the marine resource management and conservation community. The process of providing information to marine resources managers and conservation decision makers involves work flows that must be supported by tools to process and synthesize oceanographic, socio-economic and biological data, tools to develop statistical and ecological models that convert that data into useful information, decision support tools for managers and stakeholders, and tools to evaluate and monitor ecosystem responses. To move tool development forward, a consortium of M-EBM tool developers has recently formed and has been developing a draft synopsis of interoperability standards and protocols to help guide collaborative development in this area. In this presentation we outline the emerging standards and protocols for marine geospatial data processing and tool development to support M-EBM and coastal management applications.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>halpin_MEBM.html - no PPT or paper available</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003098</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Harding, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>MacNab, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Varma, H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hart, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>The HH code: The management, manipulation and visualisation of bathymetric data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Integ. Coastal Zone Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>71-76</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Integrated Coastal Zone Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>HHcode, visualization, bathymetry, gridding and tiling, semantic model, SIM, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file hhcode.pdf&#xD;Also, manilla folder, &quot;Harding et al. 2000&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003820</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Harvey, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tulloch, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Local-government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>20</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>743-768</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>research article</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>spatial data infrastructures, SDI, data sharing, local government, U.S.</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004385</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Heath, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>How will we interact with the web of data?</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Internet Computing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>88</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Internet Computing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, user interface, future of web, web of data</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>An evolution of the Web from an information space of linked documents to a Semantic Web of linked, machine-readable data is taking place, and the migration to publishing data for machine consumption creates numerous opportunities and challenges for human-computer interaction, according to Talis Information researcher Tom Heath. &quot;If we&apos;re to fully exploit the challenges and opportunities of a Web of data, we need to move beyond the initial [technical infrastructure development] phase and work to understand how this changes the Web&apos;s user interaction paradigm,&quot; he writes. Heath says it is a mistake to assume that users of the Semantic Web will have any control over the presentation of the data they publish, which represents an opportunity for publishers to liberate themselves from visual design concerns and focus primarily on the publication of relevant, high-quality data. He suggests that homepages be discarded, while browsers for the Web of data &quot;must treat &apos;things,&apos; in the broadest sense, as first-class citizens of the interface.&quot; Semantic Web browsers could potentially facilitate a far greater level of direct manipulation in their interfaces and substantially lower the degree of indirection, Heath says. Interaction widgets in interfaces that people are already familiar with will have to change as well, with Heath reasoning that the back button in a Semantic Web browser should transfer the user to previously viewed things. Managing the assembly of data sources into a coherent whole is a major challenge, Heath notes.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>semantic_web_future.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004400</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Heath, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>How will we interact with the web of data?</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Internet Computing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>88-92</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Internet Computing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The Semantic Web is a global information space of linked data, designed for machine&#xD;consumption rather than human use. Right? Well, yes and no. It&#x2019;s true to say that machinereadable&#xD;data, given explicit semantics and published online, coupled with the ability to link&#xD;data in distributed data sets, are the Semantic Web&#x2019;s key selling points. Together, these&#xD;features allow aggregation and integration of heterogeneous data on an unprecedented scale,&#xD;and machines will do the grunt work for us.&#xD;However, without a human somewhere in this process to reap the rewards of these new&#xD;capabilities, the endeavour is meaningless. Far from removing humans from the equation, a Web of machinereadable&#xD;data (the Semantic Web; we also call it the &#x201C;Web of data&#x201D;) creates significant challenges and&#xD;opportunities for human-computer interaction.&#xD;To date, the Semantic Web community has mostly been busy developing the technical infrastructure to make the&#xD;Web of data feasible in principle and publishing linked data sets to make it a reality. If we&#x2019;re to fully exploit the&#xD;challenges and opportunities of a Web of data, we need to move beyond the initial phase and work to understand&#xD;how this changes the Web&#x2019;s user interaction paradigm.&#xD;In this column, I&#x2019;ll discuss some ways in which our interaction with the Web of data might differ from how we&#xD;interact with the established Web of documents, and what this might mean for both users and producers of Web&#xD;content.&#xD;&#xD;An evolution of the Web from an information space of linked documents to a Semantic Web of linked, machine-readable data is taking place, and the migration to publishing data for machine consumption creates numerous opportunities and challenges for human-computer interaction, according to Talis Information researcher Tom Heath. &quot;If we&apos;re to fully exploit the challenges and opportunities of a Web of data, we need to move beyond the initial [technical infrastructure development] phase and work to understand how this changes the Web&apos;s user interaction paradigm,&quot; he writes. Heath says it is a mistake to assume that users of the Semantic Web will have any control over the presentation of the data they publish, which represents an opportunity for publishers to liberate themselves from visual design concerns and focus primarily on the publication of relevant, high-quality data. He suggests that homepages be discarded, while browsers for the Web of data &quot;must treat &apos;things,&apos; in the broadest sense, as first-class citizens of the interface.&quot; Semantic Web browsers could potentially facilitate a far greater level of direct manipulation in their interfaces and substantially lower the degree of indirection, Heath says. Interaction widgets in interfaces that people are already familiar with will have to change as well, with Heath reasoning that the back button in a Semantic Web browser should transfer the user to previously viewed things. Managing the assembly of data sources into a coherent whole is a major challenge, Heath notes.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>semantic_web_future.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003907</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Heylings, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bravo, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Evaluating governance: A process for understanding how co-management is functioning, and why, in the Galapagos Marine Reserve</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>50</VOLUME><PAGES>174-208</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>The innovative Galapagos Marine Reserve co-management regime has been operating since 1999.&#xD;International developments call for ways to help managers evaluate governance process and impact.&#xD;New methodology is applied to the rich store of quantitative and qualitative data that is already&#xD;available, and shows the richness of analysis and understanding that can be derived. The results of&#xD;this analysis help explain why the co-management regime performs strongly in terms of strategic&#xD;vision, participation, empowerment, consensus orientation and resilience and yet less well in terms of&#xD;responsible representation, equity and credibility.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>galagagos_MPA_governance.pdf&#xD;whole issue is special issue on management of the Galagagos</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004205</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Heyman, W. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kjerfve, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Hydrological and oceanographic considerations for integrated coastal zone management in southern Belize</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Env. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>24</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>229-245</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Environmental Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Ecosystem management; Coastal zone management;</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Belize; Hydrology, watershed, catchment, ecosystem-based management, EBM</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The objectives of this study are to: (1) characterize&#xD;the meteorology and hydrology of the Maya Mountain&#x2013;&#xD;Marine Area Transect in southern Belize, (2) employ a simple&#xD;water balance model to examine the discharge rates of&#xD;seven watersheds to Port Honduras, (3) test the validity of&#xD;the hydrological model, (4) explore the implications of potential&#xD;landscape and hydrological alterations, and (5) examine&#xD;the value of protected areas. The southern coastal portion of&#xD;the study area is classified as wet tropical forest and the remainder&#xD;as moist tropical forest. Rainfall is 3000&#x2013;4000 mm&#xD;annually. Resulting annual freshwater discharge directly into&#xD;Port Honduras is calculated at 2.5 3 109 m3, a volume equal&#xD;to the basin. During the rainy season, June&#x2013;September, 84%&#xD;of the annual discharge occurs, which causes the bay to&#xD;become brackish. Port Honduras serves as an important&#xD;nursery ground for many species of commercially important&#xD;fish and shellfish. The removal of forest cover in the uplands,&#xD;as a result of agriculture, aquaculture, and village development,&#xD;is likely to significantly accelerate erosion. Increased&#xD;erosion would reduce soil fertility in the uplands and negatively&#xD;affect mangrove, seagrass, and coral reef productivity&#xD;in the receiving coastal embayment. Alternatively, the conservation&#xD;of an existing protected areas corridor, linking the&#xD;Maya Mountains to the Caribbean Sea, is likely to enhance&#xD;regional sustainable economic development. This study&#xD;aims to support environmental management at the scale of&#xD;the &#x2018;&#x2018;ecoscape&#x2019;&#x2019;&#x2014;a sensible ecological unit of linked watersheds&#xD;and coastal and marine environments.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Heyman_Kjerfve.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002365</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hickey, R. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bush, D. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Boulay, R. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1997</YEAR><TITLE>GIS supports coastal risk assessment</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GIS World</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>10</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>54-56, 58</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GIS World</ALTERNATE_TITLE><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004346</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hildreth, R. G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Place-based ocean management: Emerging U.S. law and practice</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><PAGES>659-670</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine reserves, marine sanctuaries, coral reefs, MRM, marine resource management, MPA, marine geography, resilience</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Marine protected areas and marine reserves are being established in United States ocean waters under&#xD;several federal and state laws. Relevant laws include the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, the&#xD;Magnuson&#x2013;Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management, the National Monument Act, the federal&#xD;Submerged Lands Act, and the California Marine Life Protection Act. This article evaluates U.S. placebased&#xD;ocean management from the perspectives of relevant international law principles and programs&#xD;and foreign nation experiences relevant to the U.S. It then focuses on the challenges presented in&#xD;managing multiple uses of U.S. ocean waters in the face of federal and state jurisdictional complexity.&#xD;Integrating place-based management with fisheries management is given special attention.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>place_based_ocean_mgmt.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004119</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hoagland, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jin, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Accounting for marine economic activities in large marine ecosystems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>246-258</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>We develop an index that is a measure of the intensity of marine activities in large marine ecosystems (LMEs). We compare this marine activity index with an index of socioeconomic development across ocean regions. This comparison identifies regions that may be capable of achieving the sustainable development of their regional marine environment on their own and those that are less likely to do so. The latter may be candidates for international financial or management assistance. An important next step is to carry out detailed case studies designed to improve our understanding of any specific ocean region.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>LME_economics.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003756</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hobona, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>James, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fairbairn, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Multidimensional visualization of degrees of relevance of geographic data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>20</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>469-490</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>geovisualization, geographic information retrieval, geospatial metadata, ontology, multidimensional visualization, spatialization, geographic information science</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;multiD_ontology.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004266</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hopkinson, C. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lugo, A. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Alber, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Covich, A. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Van Bloem, S. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Forecasting effects of sea-level rise and windstorms on coastal and inland ecosystems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Front. Ecol. Environ.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>6</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>255-263</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>The Ecological Society of America</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment</ALTERNATE_TITLE><LABEL>This Special Issue of Frontiers, on the study of ecology at continental scales, was generously funded by the&#xD;National Science Foundation, USDA-ARS, and Consortium for Regional Ecological Observatories.&#xD;Special thanks also to AIBS.</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ecological networks, ecosystem informatics, ecoinformatics, connectivity</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>We identify a continental-scale network of sites to evaluate how two aspects of climate change &#x2013; sea-level rise&#xD;and intensification of windstorms &#x2013; will influence the structure, function, and capacity of coastal and inland&#xD;forest ecosystems to deliver ecosystem services (eg carbon sequestration, storm protection, pollution control,&#xD;habitat support, food). The network consists of coastal wetland and inland forest sites across the US and is representative&#xD;of continental-level gradients of precipitation, temperature, vegetation, frequency of occurrence of&#xD;major windstorms, value of insured properties, tidal range, watershed land use, and sediment availability. The&#xD;network would provide real-time measurements of the characteristics of sea-level rise and windstorm events&#xD;and would allow an assessment of the responses of wetlands, streams, and inland forests at spatial and temporal&#xD;scales associated with sustainability of ecosystem services. We illustrate the potential of this approach with&#xD;examples of hypotheses that could be tested across the network.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Frontiers_Ecology --&gt; hopkinson_sealevel_rise.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.frontiersinecology.org</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003996</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hornsby, K. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cole, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Modeling moving geospatial objects from an event-based perspective</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>555-574</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>review article</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>data model, marine GIS, harbor, port, offshore, coastal GIS, GIS and oceanography (in part)</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004166</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hornsby, K. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yuan, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Understanding Dynamics of Geographic Domains</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>UCGIS</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Boca Raton, Florida</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>CRC Press</PUBLISHER><PAGES>240</PAGES><ISBN>9781420060348</ISBN><LABEL>UCGIS research agenda</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>UCGIS workshop, geovisualization, visualization, visual analytics, spatiotemporal analysis and modeling; spatiotemporal visual analytics; spatiotemporal data mining; spatiotemporal reasoning; and spatiotemporal ontologies.</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Building upon the success of the workshop on Geospatial Data Mining and Visualization held in 2003, the University Consortium for Geographic Information Science (UCGIS) is hosting this workshop to bring together leading researchers from multiple disciplines to discuss next-generation computation and visualization models needed for the understanding of dynamics in geographic domains. The workshop is sponsored by geospatial intelligence communities.&#xD;Participants will be selected from UCGIS member institutions to join representatives from an array of government agencies to discuss visions, challenges, and research needs in the topical area. In addition to plenary sessions, breakout-group meetings, and open-space discussions, the workshop will invite representatives from the intelligence community to demonstrate current uses of spatiotemporal information technologies and elaborate on needs for further developments.&#xD;The workshop is expected to deliver two books: one on the research and development agenda and another to address broader issues and research challenges on the topical area. Possible topics for consideration at the workshop include (but are not limited to): spatiotemporal analysis and modeling; spatiotemporal visual analytics; spatiotemporal data mining; spatiotemporal reasoning; and spatiotemporal ontologies.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Table of Contents &#xD;Cognitive Aspects, Representation, and Data Models &#xD;Why Do We Keep Turning Time into Space? C. Ware &#xD;Representation and Computation of Geographic Dynamics, M.F. Goodchild and A. Glennon &#xD;Complex Networks for Representation and Analysis of Dynamic Geographies, S.D. Prager &#xD;Analysis, Computation, and Modeling &#xD;Exploring the Use of Gazetteers and Geocoders for the Analysis and Interpretation of a Dynamically Changing World, D.W. Goldberg, J.P. Wilson, and C.A. Knoblock &#xD;Reconstructing Individual-Level Exposure to Environmental Contaminants Using Time-GIS, J.R. Meliker &#xD;Analysis of Human Space-Time Behavior: Geovisualization and Geocomputational Approaches, M.-P. Kwan and F. Ren &#xD;Relating Visual Changes in Images with Spatial Metrics, N. Lam, G. Zhou, and W. Ju &#xD;Visualization and Simulation &#xD;Spatio-Temporal Visualization of Built Environments, N. Shiode and L. Yin &#xD;Visual Analysis of Urban Terrain Dynamics, T. Butkiewicz, R. Chang, W. Ribarsky, and Z. Wartell &#xD;Mobile, Aware, Intelligent Agents (MAIA), D.A. Bennett and W. Tang &#xD;Comparing the Growth Dynamics of Real and Virtual Cities, N. Shiode and P.M. Torrens</NOTES><URL>http://www.ucgis.org/dynamics_workshop/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004335</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Howe, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rhee, S. Y.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The future of biocuration</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>47-50</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, data management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>To thrive, the field that links biologists and their data urgently needs structure, recognition and support.&#xD;The exponential growth in&#xD;the amount of biological data&#xD;means that revolutionary measures&#xD;are needed for data management,&#xD;analysis and accessibility. Online&#xD;databases have become important avenues&#xD;for publishing biological data. Biocuration,&#xD;the activity of organizing, representing and&#xD;making biological information accessible to&#xD;both humans and computers, has become&#xD;an essential part of biological discovery and&#xD;biomedical research. But curation increasingly&#xD;lags behind data generation in funding,&#xD;development and recognition.&#xD;We propose three urgent actions to advance&#xD;this key field. First, authors, journals and&#xD;curators should immediately begin to work&#xD;together to facilitate the exchange of data&#xD;between journal publications and databases.&#xD;Second, in the next five years, curators,&#xD;researchers and university administrations&#xD;should develop an accepted recognition structure&#xD;to facilitate community-based curation&#xD;efforts. Third, curators, researchers, academic&#xD;institutions and funding agencies should, in&#xD;the next ten years, increase the visibility and&#xD;support of scientific curation as a professional&#xD;career.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_biocuration.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003411</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Huettmann, F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Databases and science-based management in the context of wildlife, habitat and conservation: Towards an ISO standard for objective decision-making for the informed global community by making effective use of the Internet.</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>unpublished manuscript</SECONDARY_TITLE><PAGES>6 pp.</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>data management, GIS and oceanography integration, data model, Oregon Coastal Atlas, wildlife, habitat, ecology</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - fallk_sci_db.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003423</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Huettmann, F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Towards a marine environmental information system (MEnvIS) for the Northwest Atlantic: Experiences and suggestions from a multi-disciplinary GIS conservation research project using public large scale monitoring and research data baes from the internet</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>WSEAS Trans. Biol. Biomed.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>82-90</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>WSEAS Transactions on Biology and Biomedicine</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>large digital databases, seabird monitoring, public internet, WWW, download marine environmental information system, Northwest Atlantic, GIS and oceanography, Coastal Atlas</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have a reprint, OCA file folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002677</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hughes Clarke, J. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mayer, L. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wells, D. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1996</YEAR><TITLE>Shallow-water imaging multibeam sonars: A new toll for investigating seafloor processes in the coastal zone and on the continental shelf</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geophys. Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>18</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>607-629</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geophysical Researches</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special issue, advances in seafloor mapping using sidescan sonar and multibeam bathymetry data</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003947</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hutchinson, D. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rowland, R. W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Law of the Sea, the continental shelf, and marine research</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>EOS, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>88</VOLUME><NUMBER>22</NUMBER><PAGES>237, 240</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network, Arctic, maritime boundary, Ireland, Australia, bathymetry</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The question of the amount of seabed to&#xD;which a coastal nation is entitled is&#xD;addressed in the United Nations Convention&#xD;on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This treaty,&#xD;ratified by 153 nations and in force since&#xD;1994, specifies national obligations, rights,&#xD;and jurisdiction in the oceans, and it allows&#xD;nations a continental shelf out to at least 200&#xD;nautical miles or to a maritime boundary.&#xD;Article 76 (A76) of the convention enables&#xD;coastal nations to establish their continental&#xD;shelves beyond 200 nautical miles and therefore&#xD;to control, among other things, access&#xD;for scientific research and the use of seabed&#xD;resources that would otherwise be considered&#xD;to lie beyond national jurisdiction.&#xD;To date, seven submissions for extended&#xD;continental shelves (ECS) have been filed&#xD;under UNCLOS (Table 1). These submissions&#xD;have begun to define the ambiguities in A76.&#xD;How these ambiguities are resolved into&#xD;final ECS boundaries will probably set&#xD;important precedents guiding the future&#xD;delimitation of the ECS by the United States,&#xD;which has not ratified the convention, and&#xD;other coastal nations. This report uses examples&#xD;from the first three submissions&#x2014;by the&#xD;Russian Federation, Brazil, and Australia&#x2014;to&#xD;identify outstanding issues encountered in&#xD;applying A76 to ECS delimitation.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>law_of_the_sea.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/clcs_home.htm&#xD;ttp://www.ga.gov.au/nmd/products/thematic/ambis.jsp</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002809</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Hviding, E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Contextual flexibility: Present status and future of customary marine tenure in Solomon Islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>253-269</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine resource management, southwest Pacific, MRM, sabbatical</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder - &quot;MRM papers&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002738</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Jackson, S. E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>The water is not empty: Cross-cultural issues in conceptualising sea space</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Austr. Geog.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>87-95</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Australian Geographer</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>sea rights, aboriginal marine management, landscape, cultural geography, coastal zone management, indigenous peoples</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Prof. Geographer folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003306</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Jacob, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hamre, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Evensen, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mughal, K. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Developing a marine information system by integrating existing ocean models using object-oriented technology</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>87-106</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS, marine data model, marine information system, object-oriented, design and software reuse, data assimiliation, ocean model, ecosystem model</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - nordicMDM.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004301</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Jankowski, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zielinska, A.-L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Swobodzinski, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Choice Modeler: A web-based spatial multiple criteria evaluation tool</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>541-561</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special GIScience session at 2008 ESRI User Conference; ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network; Let&apos;s Improve Transportation</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This article presents a concept of a Web-based spatial multiple criteria evaluation&#xD;tool for individual and group use called Choice Modeler (CM). CM was originally&#xD;conceived as part of a larger Participatory Geographic Information System for&#xD;Transportation project (PGIST; http://www.pgist.org) aimed at developing and&#xD;evaluating Internet-hosted capabilities to support participatory decision processes.&#xD;CM is designed to be either a part of a larger information system such as PGIST or&#xD;a standalone tool used for evaluation of decision variants. The decision support&#xD;functions provided by CM aid in reducing the cognitive complexity of the decision&#xD;space characterized by multiple decision options, evaluation criteria, and criterion&#xD;weights. This is achieved by incorporating in CM the sensitivity analysis functions&#xD;for the identification of criteria that do not influence the decision option ranking.&#xD;Users can remove such criteria from further consideration and thus lessen the&#xD;cognitive burden of evaluation, which may be essential in multi-stakeholder&#xD;participatory decision processes. The additional capabilities of CM include a vote&#xD;aggregation function to collate individual option rankings into a group ranking, and&#xD;measures of agreement/disagreement to inform the participants about a groupderived&#xD;desirability of specific decision options. The design of CM was implemented&#xD;using Web-service architecture. In the article we describe the design of CM and&#xD;discuss its advantages and limitations.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;choice-modeler.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004303</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Janowicz, K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ke&#xDF;ler, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The role of ontology in improving gazetteer interaction</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>22</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>1129-1157</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Digital gazetteer; Semantic similarity; Ontology; Gazetteer research</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Gazetteers are more than basic place name directories containing names and locations for named geographic places. Most of them contain additional information, including a categorization of gazetteer entries using a typing scheme. This paper focuses on the nature of these categorization schemes. We argue that gazetteers can benefit from an ontological approach to typing schemes, providing a formalization that will better support gazetteer applications, maintenance, interoperability, and semi-automatic feature annotation. We discuss the process of developing such an ontology as a modification of an existing feature type thesaurus; the difficulties in mapping from thesauri to ontologies are described in detail. To demonstrate the benefits of a categorization based on ontologies, a new gazetteer Web (and programming) interface is introduced and the impact on gazetteer interoperability is discussed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;gazetteer_ontology.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003300</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ji, W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Li, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Marine and coastal GIS: Science or technology driven?</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>1-3</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - 1-sci_or_tech.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003217</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Jilan, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bangyan, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Xianglong, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Development in precision seafloor survey and mapping in China</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>25</VOLUME><PAGES>79-86</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, coastal GIS, marine GIS, special issue, submarine survey and mapping, multibeam system, data processing and integration, topographic and geomorphologic mapping</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have pdf file - china_seafloor.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003683</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Juda, L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>The report of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy: State perspectives</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>1-16, 10.1080/08920750500364930</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ecosystem-based management; ocean governance; ocean management; U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, marine protected areas, MPA, OCA</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT> In its final report, An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century , the U.S.Commission on Ocean Policy, created by the Oceans Act of 2000, strongly endorsed regional scale, ecosystem-based management of coastal/ocean areas. To advance such an approach the Commission made numerous recommendations, including suggestions for both structural change in government and also for change in policy. As mandated by Congress, the process leading to the ultimate issuance of the Commission&apos;s final report specifically allowed for state governors to comment on a preliminary version of that report. The Commission was then to take those comments into account before issuing its final report. Thus, state governors were given a rare opportunity to indicate their preferences and concerns on the totality of U.S. coastal/ocean governance efforts. It is clear that implementation of the Commission&apos;s recommendations will require political support from the states, both in terms of encouraging the Administration and Congress to adopt change and in ensuring required federal-state cooperation. Accordingly, it is of great importance to understand the views of the states on the issues addressed by the Commission. This article outlines and examines key concerns raised by the nation&apos;s governors on the proposed new approach to coastal/ocean governance.&#xD; &#xA0;</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004284</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Jude, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Investigating the potential role of visualization techniques in participatory coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>36</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>331-349</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>adaptation; climate change; coastal management; participation; visualization</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>he current shift toward &#x201C;soft&#x201D; forms of coastal defense as means of adapting to future sea level rise requires careful communication and consultation if they are to gain widespread public acceptance. For this to be achieved then coastal managers must improve the manner in which they communicate with stakeholders and members of the public. One possible solution may be through the application of landscape visualization techniques to illustrate how new policies or management interventions may shape the coast. This article investigates the potential role of such methods in participatory coastal management. Using interviews with coastal managers, the potential application of visualization techniques in coastal management processes are explored in detail. The findings suggest that while a number of possible roles for visualization techniques exist, there is an urgent need for practical testing and evaluation of the technology in participatory decision-making processes.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>participatory_viz.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004044</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Jude, S. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jones, A. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Watkinson, A. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Brown, I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gill, J. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>The development of a visualization methodology for integrated coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>525-544</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal management; decision support; virtual reality; visualization; VRGIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Abstract&#xD;Coastal management information is frequently communicated to stakeholders and the public through complicated management documents and engineering plans. With the recognition that public involvement in coastal decision-making processes should be widened have come calls to develop new techniques to communicate complicated coastal information. Using Virtual Reality Geographical Information Systems and visualization packages, such information may be presented using formats more suitable for public consultation and information dissemination exercises than those currently employed. Using a site on the north Norfolk coast of England, an integrated Geographical Information Systems based methodology is presented that allows the visualization of proposed coastal management interventions. Visualizations have been produced that can be published in traditional paper-based management documents, or electronically. The different visualizations are compared and the technical issues surrounding their use discussed. It is argued that the methodology has clear advantages over traditional communication methods, although further research is necessary to determine how it may be practically employed by coastal managers.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>viz_ICZM.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003535</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kavouras, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kokla, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tomai, E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Comparing categories among geographic ontologies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>145-154</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers and Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special issue on AGILE, Association of Geographic Information Laboratories in Europe, GIScience in Europe</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Geographic ontologies; Semantic properties; Semantic relations; Similarity, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, CMRC</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - AGILE_CompGEosci--&gt;ontology_categories.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003129</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kay, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Alder, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Brown, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Houghton, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Management cybernetics: A new institutional framework for coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><PAGES>213-277</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal management, communication, Internet, World Wide Web, &quot;dimensional thinking&quot;, web GIS, cybergeography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - cybernetics.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003355</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kay, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Christie, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2001</YEAR><TITLE>An analysis of the impact of the Internet on coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>29</VOLUME><PAGES>157-181</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal management, communication, Internet, World Wide Web, teaching</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The role of the Internet in coastal management practice is analyzed through the&#xD;Internet&#x2019;s communication and information access capacity. Primary and secondary&#xD;impacts of the Internet in coastal management are assessed. A broad research framework&#xD;is employed, including background on the development and spread of the Internet&#xD;worldwide; analysis of emerging literature on the societal impact of the Internet;&#xD;limited existing research on the use of the Internet by environmental management&#xD;professionals generally and coastal managers in particular; and personal experience&#xD;of the authors in the development of coastal management Internet sites. This&#xD;analytical framework is supplemented by the first survey of integrated coastal management&#xD;(ICM) Internet websites by www.coastalmanagement.com and a case study&#xD;of the Internet Center for Coastal Management (ICCM) Internet-based communication&#xD;platform based at the University of Washington. The survey of ICM websites&#xD;found a total of 77 websites worldwide, with a dominance of sites in English located&#xD;in the developed world. Assessment of the first year of operation of the ICCM project&#xD;to facilitate discussion between coastal management practitioners and students in&#xD;the United States and the Philippines demonstrates the enormous potential of the&#xD;Internet as a communications tool in coastal management and also reveals the many&#xD;practical technological and cultural constraints of using the Internet, especially in&#xD;working on a project between the developed and developing world. Three groups of&#xD;scenarios of the future use of the Internet in coastal management with decreasing&#xD;levels of forecast certainty, namely, &#x201C;probable,&#x201D; and &#x201C;possible,&#x201D; and &#x201C;potential for&#x201D;&#xD;are presented and discussed. Finally, the potential for the Internet to fundamentally&#xD;transform the practice of coastal management is analyzed. It is concluded that while&#xD;such a potential exists, there remain significant research questions requiring further&#xD;analysis before the full transformative potential, and the possible impacts of such a&#xD;transformation on coastal management, can be fully assessed. This article aims to&#xD;provide a benchmark against which such future assessments can be made.</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - Internet_CZM.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003887</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kearney, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Berkes, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Charles, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pinkerton, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wiber, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>The role of participatory governance and community-based management in integrated coastal and ocean management in Canada</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><PAGES>79-104</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>capacity-building, community-based management, cross-scale linkages,</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>integrated management, oceans policy, participatory governance</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>There is compelling evidence that participatory governance is crucial for contending&#xD;with complex problems of managing for multiple values and outcomes to achieve&#xD;ecological sustainability and economic development. Canada&#x2019;s Oceans Act, and federal&#xD;oceans policy provide a strong basis for the participatory governance and communitybased&#xD;management of coastal and large ocean resources. The implementation of&#xD;the Oceans Act and oceans policy has resulted in some steps toward participatory&#xD;governance but has not adequately provided the mechanisms for a strong role&#xD;for communities in integrated coastal and ocean management (ICOM). In order to strengthen and develop community participation in ICOM, nine initiatives are&#xD;recommended: (1) shifting paradigms, (2) overcoming &#x2018;turf protection,&#x2019; (3) ensuring&#xD;compatibility of goals, (4) ensuring sufficiency of information, (5) dealing with internal&#xD;community stratification, (6) creating cross-scale linkages, (7) creating a participatory&#xD;policy environment, (8) building community capacity, and (9)monitoring and assessment&#xD;of local-level initiatives.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>participatory_community_Canada.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004200</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kendall, M. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Miller, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The influence of thematic and spatial resolution on maps of a coral reef ecosystem</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>75-102</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Benthic mapping, coastal management, landscape ecology, resampling, habitat mapping, landscape, seascape, bathymetry, marine geomorphology, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Four maps of a reef ecosystem were created using two levels of both spatial and thematic&#xD;resolution commonly used in science and management applications. Differences among&#xD;maps were quantified using ecologically meaningful landscape indices. The objective&#xD;was to inform research and management activities that are based on maps of reef&#xD;ecosystems. Results indicate that inferences regarding the structure and organization&#xD;of reef ecosystems are sensitive to changes in resolution of the maps characterizing&#xD;them. Hard bottom, sand, and patchy features were the most sensitive to change in map&#xD;resolution whereas continuous seagrass beds and linear reef features were not.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>resolutions_coral_maps.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004360</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Keniron, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Curran, O.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cunnifee, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ryan, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ryan, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Shearer, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>in press, 2008</YEAR><TITLE>The marineGrid project in Ireland with webcom</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><PAGES>doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.024</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers and Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Linear Feature Detection, Lithological Classification, Large data set</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>analysis, Distributed Workflow, Webcom, ICAN?, Ireland, Irish National Seabed Survey</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The 1999&#x2013;2007 Irish National Seabed Survey is one of the largest ocean floor mapping&#xD;projects ever attempted. Its aim is to map the ocean floor of the Irish territorial&#xD;waters (approximately 525 000 km2). To date, the Geological Survey of Ireland has&#xD;gathered in excess of four terabytes of multibeam sonar data from the Irish national&#xD;seabed, and this data set is expected to exceed ten terabytes upon completion. The&#xD;main challenge that arises from having so much data is how to extract accurate&#xD;information given the size of the data set. Geological interpretation is carried out&#xD;by visual inspection of bathymetric patterns. The size of this, and similar, data sets&#xD;renders the extraction of knowledge by human observers infeasible. Consequently,&#xD;the focus has turned to using artificial intelligence and computational methods for&#xD;assistance. The commercial and environmental sensitivity of the data means that secure&#xD;data processing and transmission are of paramount importance. This has led to the creation of the MarineGrid project within the Grid-Ireland organisation.&#xD;New methods have been developed for statistical analysis of bathymetric information&#xD;specifically for automated geological interpretation of rock types on the sea&#xD;floor and feature extraction from the sea floor. We present a discussion on how&#xD;to provide Marine and Geological researchers convenient yet secure access to resources&#xD;that make use of grid technologies including pre-written algorithms in order&#xD;to exploit the Irish National Seabed Survey data archive.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>marineGrid_Ireland.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004102</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kiehle, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Heier, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Greve, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Requirements for next generation spatial data infrastructures--Standardized web bsed geoprocessing and web service orchestration</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>819-834</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SDI, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, CMRC, NSDI, OGC, WMS, WFS, metadata, forest fire client, DHTML</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004011</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Klien, E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>A rule-based strategy for the semantic annotation of geodata</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>437-452</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>The ability to represent geospatial semantics is of great importance when building&#xD;geospatial applications for the Web. This ability will enhance discovery, retrieval and&#xD;translation of geographic information as well as the reuse of geographic information&#xD;in different contexts. The problem of generating semantic annotations has been&#xD;recognized as one of the most serious obstacles for realizing the Geospatial Semantic&#xD;Web vision. We present a rule-based strategy for the semantic annotation of geodata&#xD;that combines Semantic Web and Geospatial Web Services technology. In our&#xD;approach, rules are employed to partially automate the annotation process. Rules&#xD;define conditions for identifying geospatial concepts. Based on these rules, spatial&#xD;analysis procedures are implemented that allow for inferring whether or not a feature&#xD;in a dataset represents an instance of a geospatial concept. This automated evaluation&#xD;of features in the dataset generates valuable information for the creation and&#xD;refinement of semantic annotations on the concept level. The approach is illustrated&#xD;by a case study on annotating data sources containing representations of lowlands.&#xD;The presented strategy lays the foundations for the specification of a semantic&#xD;annotation tool for geospatial web services that supports data providers in annotating&#xD;their sources according to multiple domain views.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; semantic_annotation.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004374</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kraak, M.-J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Why maps matter in GIScience</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Cartographic J.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>43</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>82-89</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>The Cartographic Journal</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>geovisualization, cartography and GIS, geographic information science, what&apos;s in a name, history of GIScience, teaching, GEO 465/565</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper presents some thoughts about the role of maps&#xD;in GIScience and visualization. In particular, it highlights&#xD;some developments and trends in the discipline that have&#xD;revived interest in visualisation and increased the importance&#xD;of maps in GIScience.&#xD;&#xD;During the GIScience process, different maps and graphics&#xD;have their role to play to assist the researcher in understanding&#xD;the data and to support problem solving. In this&#xD;process maps retain their traditional roles in enhancing&#xD;insight in spatial patterns and relationships by symbolizing&#xD;an abstraction of reality via a cartographic design process.&#xD;Maps are flexible interfaces to geospatial data and offer&#xD;interaction with the data behind the representation. Maps&#xD;are instruments that encourage exploration, because they&#xD;are there to stimulate thinking, to show the unexpected, to&#xD;point to the outliers and to demonstrate trends.&#xD;&#xD;Maps and graphics cannot do this alone. Different&#xD;algorithms, models, and other methods and techniques&#xD;are behind the images, for each of the phases in the&#xD;GIScience process. In this paper, the impact of some&#xD;developments and trends have been discussed without&#xD;pretending to be complete. For instance, the whole field of&#xD;(visual) data mining has not been discussed, but is an&#xD;important component of the GIScience process. Maps do&#xD;much more then just present geographical data. Maps cover&#xD;the range from presentation all the way to exploration in a&#xD;connected, dynamic and interactive environment. The keen&#xD;interest in GIScience goes parallel with a revived interest in&#xD;visualization in general and maps in particular. Maps do&#xD;matter.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>why_maps_matter.pdf</NOTES><URL>url 1: map definitions http://www.usm.maine.edu/,maps/essays/&#xD;andrews.htm&#xD;url 2: ICA maps http://www.icaci.org/en/strategic.html&#xD;url 3: John Snow Cholera Map of London http://www.ph.ucla.edu/&#xD;epi/snow.html&#xD;url 4: Minard&#x2019;s Map of Napoleon in Russia http://www.itc.nl/&#xD;personal/kraak/1812&#xD;url 5: Thiessen Polygon and Snow&#x2019;s Map http://www.ncgia.ucsb.&#xD;edu/pubs/snow/snow.html&#xD;url 6: US Mortality Atlas http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/&#xD;pubd/other/atlas/atlas.htm&#xD;url 7: Zorgatlas the Netherlands http://www.rivm.nl/vtv/data/&#xD;site_atlas/&#xD;url 8: Coordinated &amp; Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization&#xD;http://www.cvev.org/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001737</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kucera, G. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Object-oriented modeling of coastal environmental information</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>18</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>183-196</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine GIS, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder, geography/GIS/general oceanography</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003823</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kuehl, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Alexander, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Carter, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gerald, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gerber, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Harris, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McNinch, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Orpin, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pratson, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Syvitski, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Walsh, J.P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Understanding sediment transfer from land to ocean</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>87</VOLUME><NUMBER>29</NUMBER><PAGES>281, 286</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>seafloor mapping, multibeam bathymetry, EM1002, Kilo Moana, sediment transport</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT> A new research program focusing on sediment dispersal across the active margin of the New Zealand east coast has provided the foundation for a holistic understanding of the transport and fate of terrestrial materials in the coastal ocean.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>sed_transfer.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003398</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kuhn, W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Semantic reference systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>17</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>405-409</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Metadata, ontologies, semantic interoperability</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>I have the pdf file - semantic_ref.pdf</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003354</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kullenberg, G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>The virtual university approach</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>709-718</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>distance education, education, coastal zone management, ocean law and governance, marine resource management, MRM</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>For over two decades now, the IOI has conducted an annual intensive training programme,&#xD;on a global basis comprising 300 classroom hours plus field trips, library research and&#xD;simulation exercises, for 20&#x2013;25 mid-career civil servants from developing countries. The&#xD;programme, one of the oldest, is still being carried out. It is broadly interdisciplinary and&#xD;holistic. Always led by an outstanding scholar from a developing country, the teaching faculty&#xD;consists of over 20 lecturers and discussion leaders, partly drawn from the faculty of Dalhousie&#xD;University, partly from intergovernmental or governmental institutions and the private sector&#xD;as well as alumni, from all over the world. The programme covers ocean law and governance&#xD;in the broadest sense and is intended to assist developing countries in the implementation of&#xD;the whole UNCLOS/UNCED process. Until now the course did not lead to a University&#xD;degree, even though quite a number of participants went on to obtain a Master&#x2019;s Degree at&#xD;Dalhousie University.&#xD;During the last 5 years, the IOI has developed into a unique network of Operational Centres&#xD;in all parts of the world. All are located at prestigious institutions, each with its own&#xD;strength&#x2014;some in law and policy, some in oceanography or fisheries management, some in&#xD;technology.&#xD;The IOI is now integrating all these efforts, and the experiences of two decades, into one&#xD;innovative initiative; the establishment of the IOI Virtual University. Its Master&#x2019;s Degree&#xD;programme will consist of a number of core courses which can be taken on-line and a number&#xD;of optional courses, presently available at various IOI Centres and their Host institutions, but&#xD;gradually to be developed for distance learning.</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - virtualuniv.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003204</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kumar, K. V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Palit, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bhan, S. K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1997</YEAR><TITLE>Bathymetric mapping in Rupnarayan-Hooghly river confluence using Indian remote sensing satellite data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Remote Sensing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>18</VOLUME><NUMBER>11</NUMBER><PAGES>2269-2270</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Remote Sensing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>spectral reflectance, Indian Remote Sensing LISS, turbidity influence, bathymetry, coastal management, multi-spectral scanner</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - india_bathy97.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003892</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Kumar, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Geoinformatics 2006</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>87</VOLUME><NUMBER>44</NUMBER><PAGES>97-98</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>MMI, ICAN</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Technological advances in Earth observation&#xD;and science have enabled the collection&#xD;of vast quantities of data at multiple&#xD;spatial and temporal scales. Managing the&#xD;data and making data sets openly accessible&#xD;to researchers not only can help to reduce&#xD;redundancy in data collection and ensure&#xD;the longevity of existing data, but also can&#xD;lead to new insights as datasets are compared&#xD;and interwoven.&#xD;The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and&#xD;the Geosciences Network (GEON) co-hosted&#xD;Geoinformatics 2006, a recent meeting that&#xD;focused on the need for Earth science data&#xD;management, discovery, integration, and visualization,&#xD;which is referred to as &#x2018;geoinformatics.&#x2019;&#xD;This will improve the understanding&#xD;of the Earth over time and allow more open&#xD;access to users interested in a wide range of&#xD;data, explained keynote speaker Linda Gunderson,&#xD;the USGS acting associate director for&#xD;geology.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>geoinformatics06.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003304</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lee, D. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Shan, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Combining Lidar elevation data and IKONOS multispectral imagery for coastal classification mapping</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>117-127</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS, LIDAR, satellite image, classification, coastal mapping</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - LIDAR_IKONOS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002032</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Leggett, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jones, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1996</YEAR><TITLE>The application of GIS for flood defence in the Anglian Region: Developing for the future</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geographical Info. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>10</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>103-116</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal GIS, coastal zone management, coastal hazard, shoreline response</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003659</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lehto, L</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sarjakoski, L. T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Real-time generalization of XML-encoded spatial data for the Web and mobile devices</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>19</VOLUME><NUMBER>8-9</NUMBER><PAGES>957-973</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>real-time generalization, web GIS, OCA, Oregon Coastal Atlas, XML, spatial data, web, mobile devices</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003301</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Li, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Di, K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ma, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>3-D shoreline extraction from IKONOS satellite imagery</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>107-115</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - 3Dshoreline_IKONOS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002978</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Li, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Keong, C. W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ramcharan, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kjerfve, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Willis, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>A coastal GIS for shoreline monitoring and management -- Case study in Malaysia</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Surv. Land Inf. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>58</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>157-166</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Surveying and Land Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine and coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS, special issue</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003112</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Li, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Liu, J.-K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Felus, Y.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2001</YEAR><TITLE>Spatial modeling and analysis for shoreline change detection and coastal erosion monitoring</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>24</VOLUME><PAGES>1-12</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, change detection, coastal GIS, erosion, shoreline mapping</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - shoreline.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003215</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Li, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ma, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kaichang, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Digital tide-coordinated shoreline</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>25</VOLUME><PAGES>27-36</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, coastal GIS, marine GIS, special issue, shoreline, tide-coordinated shoreline, coastal terrain model, water surface model</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have pdf file - shoreline.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003977</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Li, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Xutong, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Guest editorial</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>1-2</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>editorial, introduction to special issue on marine and coastal GIS</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Marine_Geodesy_MCGIS5/intro.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003536</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Liang, S. H. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Croitoru, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tao, C. V.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>A distributed geospatial infrastructure for Sensor Web</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>221-231</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers and Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special issue on AGILE, Association of Geographic Information Laboratories in Europe, GIScience in Europe</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Web GIS; Web services; Sensor Web; GIServices; Sensor network, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, CMRC, NANOOS?</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - AGILE_CompGEosci--&gt;sensor_web.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001815</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lillycrop, W. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Estep, L. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Generational advancements in coastal surveying, mapping</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>36</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>10-16</PAGES><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004245</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Liu, Y.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Goodchild, M. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Guo, Q.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tian, Y.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wu, L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Towards a general field model and its order in GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>22</VOLUME><NUMBER>6-7</NUMBER><PAGES>623-644</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>teaching, GEO 580, General Field model; Order of General Field; Order-increasing operation; Non-order-increasing operation; Geographic Information Systems</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Geospatial data modelling is dominated by the distinction between continuous-field and discrete-object conceptualizations. However, the boundary between them is not always clear, and the field view is more fundamental in some respects than the object view. By viewing a set of objects as an object field and unifying it with conventional field models, a new concept, the General Field (G-Field) model, is proposed. In this paper, the properties of G-Field models, including domain, range, and categorization, are discussed. As a summary, a descriptive framework for G-Field models is proposed. Then, some common geospatial operations in geographic information systems are reconsidered from the G-Field perspective. The geospatial operations are classified into order-increasing operations and non-order-increasing operations, depending on changes induced in the G-Field&apos;s order. Generally, the order can be viewed as an indicator of the level of information extraction of geospatial data. It is thus possible to integrate the concept of order with a geo-workflow management system to support geographic semantics.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;general_field_model.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002974</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lockwood, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Introduction</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Surv. Land Inf. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>58</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>131-134</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Surveying and Land Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine and coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS, special issue</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004310</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Longdill, P. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Healy, T. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Black, K. P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>An integrated GIS approach for sustainable aquaculture management area site selection</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><PAGES>612-624</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>benthic habitat mapping, benthic habitat classification, benthic suitability index, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Within New Zealand, growth in the aquaculture industry has led to the diversification of aquaculture&#xD;sites from more sheltered bays and harbours toward open coast locations. Coastal zone managers, along&#xD;with the aquaculture industry, aim to ensure the long-term sustainability of any &#x2018;new&#x2019; sites selected.&#xD;Through targeted data collection programmes and the subsequent implementation of Geographic Information&#xD;System (GIS) based models, the most suitable and sustainable locations for Aquaculture&#xD;Management Areas (AMAs) can be identified. This approach is applied within the Bay of Plenty, New&#xD;Zealand, with specific reference to suspended mussel (Perna canaliculus) aquaculture. Within the region,&#xD;areas where maximum sustainability may be achieved make up 18% of the total area considered, with&#xD;conflicting uses and other constraints accounting for 46%. Whilst further site and development specific&#xD;studies are required to determine explicit carrying capacities, the effort required has been considerably&#xD;reduced by eliminating unsuitable locations and identifying those where sustainability can be maximised.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>GIS_aquaculture.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003267</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>L&#xF3;pez, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Watermarking of digital geospatial datasets: A review of technical, legal and copyright issues</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>16</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>589-607</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Oregon Coastal Atlas, OCA, RIDGE ISS DMO</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Gathering data accounts for more than 80% of the cost of any GIS project. Fast Internet connections and digital datasets threaten the investments of data producers through data piracy. Outside the GIS community this problem has been known for a long time, and possible solutions exist for digital imagery, formatted text, 3D meshes and so on, showing possible links to typical spatial data. This is largely achieved through embedding hidden information in a dataset without producing perceptible changes in the data, a process known as watermarking. The producer can recover the embedded information on request in order to produce evidence of ownership in a court, so the overall strategy relies on a legal basis rather than technical ones. This paper analyses the state-of-the-art for watermarking protection in digital geographical datasets. Digital imagery is demonstrably a more mature area than geographical information, even with multiple commercial vendors offering watermarking protection. 2D vector and point datasets have received less attention from the research community; however, 3D meshes have been considered by the CAD community and a handful of techniques are available for that case, and they are reviewed here.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the pdf file - data_watermarking.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004363</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lumb, L. I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Freemantle, J. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lederman, J. I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Aldridge, K. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>in press, 2008</YEAR><TITLE>Annotation modeling with formal ontologies: Implications for informal ontologies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><PAGES>doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.009</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers &amp; Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Annotation</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Formal ontology</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Informal ontology</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Ontology</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Semantic Web</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>XPointer</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Web Ontology Language, cyberinfrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Knowledge representation is increasingly recognized as an important component of any&#xD;cyberinfrastructure (CI). In order to expediently address scientific needs, geoscientists&#xD;continue to leverage the standards and implementations emerging from the World&#xD;Wide Web Consortium&#x2019;s (W3C) Semantic Web effort. In an ongoing investigation,&#xD;previous efforts have been aimed towards the development of a semantic framework for&#xD;the Global Geodynamics Project (GGP). In contrast to other efforts, the approach taken&#xD;has emphasized the development of informal ontologies, i.e., ontologies that are derived&#xD;from the successive extraction of Resource Description Framework (RDF) representations&#xD;from eXtensible Markup Language (XML), and then Web Ontology Language&#xD;(OWL) from RDF. To better understand the challenges and opportunities for&#xD;incorporating annotations into the emerging semantic framework, the present effort&#xD;focuses on knowledge-representation modeling involving formal ontologies. Although&#xD;OWL&#x2019;s internal mechanism for annotation is constrained to ensure computational&#xD;completeness and decidability, externally originating annotations based on the XML&#xD;Pointer Language (XPointer) can easily violate these constraints. Thus, the effort of&#xD;modeling with formal ontologies allows for recommendations applicable to the case of&#xD;incorporating annotations into informal ontologies.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>informal_formal_ontologies.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003709</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lunn, K. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Dearden, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Fishers&apos; needs in marine protected area zoning: A case study from Thailand</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>183-198</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD> marine conservation, multiple-use zoning, no-take zones, small-scale fisheries, MPA</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT> Conserving marine ecosystems, while ensuring the livelihood needs of communities, is a challenge for protected area managers worldwide. Multiple-use zoning can help to balance human uses with conservation goals. Developing effective zoning plans requires information on the condition and uses of marine resources and the conflicts among them. Through interviews and participant observation, we investigated residents&apos; reliance on nearshore fisheries in Ko Chang Marine National Park, a designated &#x201C;no-take&#x201D; area in eastern Thailand. Approximately 25% of households depended on fishing as their main source of income, with boat owners earning average net wages of 7&#x2013;68 US$/day in small-scale fisheries. Apparently unaware of restrictions on resource use, small-scale fishers reported working in 95% of the park&apos;s marine waters. Understanding the needs and usage patterns of small-scale fishers will help to inform management and zoning plans for Ko Chang and provide a valuable example for other parks in the region.</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003732</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lutz, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Klien, E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Ontology-based retrieval of geographic information</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>20</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>233-260</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ontology, ontologies, spatial data infrastructures, GI discovery, GI retrieval, MMI? controlled vocabulary? catalog, digital library</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004005</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lutz, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kolas, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Rule-based discovery in spatial data infrastrucure</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>317-336</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>Answering questions based on spatial data is becoming increasingly important in a&#xD;variety of domains. Often the required data are distributed and heterogeneous, and&#xD;several data sources need to be combined in order to derive the information required&#xD;by a user. Spatial data infrastructures (SDIs) are aimed at making the discovery and&#xD;access to distributed geographic data more efficient. However, the catalogue services&#xD;currently used in SDIs for discovering geographic data do not allow expressive queries&#xD;and do not take into account that more than one data source might be required to&#xD;answer a question. In this paper, we present a methodology that uses&#xD;rules&#xD;for both&#xD;the discovery of data sources and, based on the discovered data, answering user&#xD;queries in SDIs. We illustrate how this methodology allows inferences that use&#xD;relationships between individuals and the combination of data from different sources,&#xD;thus overcoming some of the limitations of other Semantic Web approaches that are&#xD;based on Description Logics. The approach is illustrated by an example from the&#xD;domain of disaster management.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; rule-based.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004340</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Lynch, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>How do your data grow?</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>28-29</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, data management, developing infrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Scientists need to ensure that their results will be managed for the long haul.&#xD;Maintaining data takes big organization.&#xD;Data can be &#x2018;big&#x2019; in different&#xD;ways. National and international&#xD;projects such as&#xD;the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)&#xD;at CERN, Europe&#x2019;s particlephysics&#xD;laboratory near Geneva in Switzerland,&#xD;or the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope planned&#xD;for northern Chile, are frequently cited for the&#xD;way they will challenge the state of the art in&#xD;computation, networking and data storage.&#xD;But research data can also be big by being of&#xD;lasting significance &#x2014; a clinical-trial result, or&#xD;the observation of a unique event. Data can be&#xD;big because of descriptive challenges that may&#xD;require context such as the experimental set-up.&#xD;Because digital data are so easily shared and&#xD;replicated and so recombinable, they present&#xD;tremendous reuse opportunities, accelerating&#xD;investigations already under way and taking&#xD;advantage of past investments in science.&#xD;To enable reuse, data must be well preserved.&#xD;In some cases the effects of data loss are economic,&#xD;because experiments have to be re-run.&#xD;In other cases, data loss represents an opportunity&#xD;lost forever. Funders now rightly view data&#xD;as assets that they are underwriting and so seek&#xD;the greatest pay-off for their investments. They&#xD;demand that researchers and host institutions&#xD;document and implement data-management&#xD;and data-sharing plans that address the full life&#xD;cycle of data &#x2014; including what happens after&#xD;a grant finishes. Host universities thus find&#xD;themselves with legal and ethical obligations&#xD;to provide a legacy of faculty data. Publishers&#xD;must also identify the most effective ways to&#xD;connect publications with data and preserve</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_commentary.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001875</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>MacDonald, I. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Best, S. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lee, C. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1992</YEAR><TITLE>Biogeochemical processes at natural oil seeps in the Gulf of Mexico: Field-trials of a small-area benthic imaging system (SABIS)</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>First Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>New Orleans, Louisiana</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PAGES>1-7</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder - &quot;MacDonald, I.&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004159</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Madin, J. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bowers, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schildhauer, M. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jones, M. B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Advancing ecological research with ontologies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trends Ecol. Evol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>23</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>159-168</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>excellent review paper</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>MMI, ICAN, cyberinfrastructure, ecosystem informatics, semantic interoperability, semantic web, ecology, ontology, ontologies, NCEAS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Ecology is inherently cross-disciplinary, drawing together&#xD;many types of information to addressquestionsabout the&#xD;natural world. Finding and integrating relevant data&#xD;to assist in these analyses is crucial, but is difficult owing&#xD;toambiguous terminology and the lack of sufficient information&#xD;about datasets. Ontologies provide a formal&#xD;mechanism for defining terms and their relationships,&#xD;and can improve the location, interpretation and integration&#xD;of data based on its inherent meaning. Ontologies&#xD;have assisted other disciplines (e.g. molecular biology)&#xD;in unifying and enriching descriptions of data, and&#xD;ecology can benefit from similar approaches. We review&#xD;ontology efforts in ecology, and describe how these can&#xD;benefit research by enhancing the location and interpretation&#xD;of relevant data for confronting crucial ecological&#xD;questions.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>ontologies_ecology.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003209</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Malakoff, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Picturing the perfect preserve</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Science</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>296</VOLUME><PAGES>245-246</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>conservation, marine protected areas, MPA, sanctuaries, SSE, habitat classification, mapping, representative, coastal management, GIS and oceanography, NCEAS, UCSB, Gulf of California</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - Perfect Preserve.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002180</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Mann, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Haux, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>Database scheme design for clinical studies based on a semantic data model</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Computational Stats. Data Analy.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>15</VOLUME><PAGES>81-108</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computational Statistics and Data Analysis</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>database scheme design, clinical studies, relational data model, semantic data models, computational statistics</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder, general geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003781</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Marks, K. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Smith, W. H. F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>An evaluation of publicly available global bathymetry grids</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geophys. Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>27</VOLUME><PAGES>19-34</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geophysical Researches</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>bathymetry, gridding, mapping, satellite, seafloor mapping, world ocean floor, bathymetric grids, bathymetry, Coral Sea, DBDB2, ETOPO2, GEBCO, GINA, satellite</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>bathymetry, Woodlark Basin</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of six publicly available global bathymetry grids: DBDB2 (Digital Bathymetric Data Base;&#xD;an ongoing project of the Naval Research Laboratory), ETOPO2 (Earth Topography; National Geophysical Data Center, 2001,&#xD;ETOPO2 Global 2&#x2019; Elevations [CD-ROM]. Boulder, Colorado, USA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and&#xD;Atmospheric Administration), GEBCO (General Bathymetric Charts of the Oceans; British Oceanographic Data Centre, 2003,&#xD;Centenary Edition of the GEBCO Digital Atlas [CD-ROM] Published on behalf of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission&#xD;and the International Hydrographic Organization Liverpool, UK), GINA (Geographic Information Network of Alaska; Lindquist&#xD;et al., 2004), Smith and Sandwell (1997), and S2004 (Smith, unpublished). The Smith and Sandwell grid, derived from satellite&#xD;altimetry and ship data combined, provides high resolution mapping of the seafloor, even in remote regions. DBDB2, ETOPO2,&#xD;GINA, and S2004 merge additional datasets with the Smith and Sandwell grid; but moving from a pixel to grid registration attenuates&#xD;short wavelengths (&lt;20 km) in the ETOPO2 and DBDB2 solutions. Short wavelengths in the GINA grid are also attenuated, but the&#xD;cause is not known. ETOPO2 anomalies are offset to the northeast, due to a misregistration in both latitude and longitude. The&#xD;GEBCO grid is interpolated from 500 m contours that were digitized from paper charts at 1:10 million scale, so it is artificially smooth;&#xD;yet new efforts have captured additional information from shallow water contours on navigational charts. The S2004 grid merges the&#xD;Smith and Sandwell grid with GEBCO over shallow depths and polar regions, and so is intended to capture the best of both products.&#xD;Our evaluation makes the choice of which bathymetry grid to use a more informed one.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>public_bathy.pdf&#xD;see also sf_mapping_viz_frontiers.pdf&#xD;see also gebco_centennial.pdf&#xD;see also Vogt et al., 2000</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002911</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Mascia, M. B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Governance of marine protected areas in the wider Caribbean: Preliminary results of an international mail survey</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>27</VOLUME><PAGES>391-402</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>governance, institutions, institutional arrangements, marine protected areas, marine sanctuaries, stakeholder participation</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002816</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Masser, I.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>All shapes and sizes: The first generation of national spatial data infrastructures</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>13</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>67-84</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>clearinghouse, archives, metadata, NSDI, Flewelling and Egenhofer</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003989</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>McFadden, L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Governing coastal spaces: The case of disappearing science in integrated coastal zone management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>429-443</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Governance; Integrated Coastal Zone Management; System</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Scientific knowledge is central to &quot;good&quot; governance of coastal spaces: developing methods through which the complexities of the coastal zone can be understood by stakeholders to improve the sustainable management of coastal systems. Enhancing our knowledge of the range of processes that shape coastal spaces and define the total behavioural environment of the system remains a primary challenge for the coastal research community. However, this article raises the argument that current approaches to Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) - the preferred governing framework for the coastal environment, do not give sufficient emphasis to this fundamental need. Improving the basic scientific knowledge that underpins policymaking at the coast is argued to be urgently needed. Issues such as that of developing a communality of the purpose and approach between stakeholders within the coastal zone (through conflict resolution and access to information, for example) seem to claim the rights of the integrated management research agenda. However, the very nature of ICZM as &quot;worthwhile coastal management&quot; requires that integrated management represents more than a governing framework. Successful integration in coastal management must also be underpinned by knowledge of the integrated behavior of the system. Science has an increasingly marginalized position within ICZM and as a result geographers, contributing knowledge of the patterns and processes of the human and environmental landscapes, are also becoming a disappearing breed in integrated coastal management.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>science_CZM.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003727</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>McIntosh, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yuan, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>A framework to enhance semantic flexibility for analysis of distributed phenomena</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>19</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>999-1018</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>field-object representation; spatiotemporal data modeling; spatiotemporal query</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004254</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>McIntyre, M. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Naar, D. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Carder, K. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Donahue, B. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mallinson, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal bathymetry from hyperspectral remote sensing data: Comparisons with high resolution multibeam bathymetry</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geophys. Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>27</VOLUME><PAGES>129-136</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geophysical Researches</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>hyperspectral, AVIRIS, shallow bathymetry, optics, coastal terrain model, CTM, compare to Ikonos</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>We present a large-scale quantitative test of a hyperspectral remote-sensing reflectance algorithm. We show that coastal bathymetry&#xD;can be adequately derived through model inversions using data from the Airborne Visible-Infrared Imaging Spectrometer instrument.&#xD;Data are analyzed from a shore-perpendicular transect 5 km offshore Sarasota, Florida at water depths ranging from 10 m to 15.5 m.&#xD;Derived bottom depths are compared to a high-resolution multibeam bathymetry survey. Model-derived depths are biased 4.9%&#xD;shallower than the mean of the multibeam depths with an RMS error of 7.83%. These results suggest that the model performs well for&#xD;retrieving bottom depths from hyperspectral data in subtropical coastal areas in water depths ranging from 10 m to 15.5 m.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>bathy_from_hyperspectral.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001939</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>McManus, D. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Presenting undergraduate coastal and estuarine research on the world-wide web</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>76</VOLUME><NUMBER>46</NUMBER><PAGES>F55</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>teaching</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>1</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000000184</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Rand McNally</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1990</YEAR><TITLE>Atlas of the Oceans</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Chicago</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Rand McNally</PUBLISHER><NOTES>Dave Siegel</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>2</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003854</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Meprasert, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE> The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami : Tourism Impacts and Recovery Progress in Thailand&apos;s Marine National Parks</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geography</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Corvallis, OR</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Oregon State University</PUBLISHER><PAGES>300</PAGES><TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TERTIARY_AUTHOR>Jim Good, Gordon Matzke</TERTIARY_AUTHOR></TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TYPE_OF_WORK>Ph.D.</TYPE_OF_WORK><SHORT_TITLE> The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami : tourism impacts and recovery progress in Thailand&apos;s marine national parks</SHORT_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Tsunami impact, natural disaster, marine park tourism, vulnerability assessment, hazard mitigation, Delphi technique. Indian Ocean Tsunami, 2004, Marine parks and reserves -- Natural disaster effects -- Thailand</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Emergency management -- Thailand</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami raised concern among marine park managers and hazard mitigation professionals about the significant impact of major coastal hazards on marine park natural resources and ecosystems. The main reason for this concern is the strong linkage of marine parks and their rich assortment of ecosystem services to coastal community social and economic well-being, particularly as it relates to park tourism. This relationship was examined for marine national parks (MNPs) along Thailand&#x2019;s Andaman coast in the aftermath of the devastating 2004 tsunami. Four principal issues were examined: the impacts of the tsunami on marine parks and how they affected the tourism economy; the recovery efforts undertaken and their effectiveness; other actions that, if taken, might have improved preparedness and made recovery efforts more effective; and how marine parks might be made more resilient to natural disasters in the future. The principal method used to address these issues was a Delphi expert opinion process, supplemented by field investigations, interviews, and spatial data collection and analysis. Four specific parks with different degrees of tsunami impacts were selected as a basis for this study. Direct and indirect tsunami impacts to the business community were judged to have the most significant effects on tourism, followed by the direct impacts of the tsunami on the built environment and associated infrastructure. Social, health and safety impacts and impacts to natural resources and ecosystems were of lesser importance to the park tourism. However, recovery actions taken to rebuild infrastructure and park-serving facilities inside and outside park boundaries were judged most effective at helping to get park tourism back on its feet; tourism recovery actions associated with natural resources, the business community, and social services were judged to be only moderately effective. Numerous barriers and constraints to marine park tourism recovery were identified, some natural, but most human-caused. An idealized set of preparedness, response, and recovery actions were also identified and prioritized. These proved useful in designing planning guidelines that will help marine parks evaluate their vulnerability, set priorities for mitigation and preparedness, and become more resilient to hazards in the future.</ABSTRACT><URL>http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/dspace/handle/1957/3112</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003770</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Michener, W. K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Meta-information concepts for ecological data management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ecol. Inform.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><PAGES>3-7</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ecological Informatics</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ecoinformatics</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Ecological databases continue to grow in volume, breadth and complexity. Higher level&#xD;descriptions of data (i.e., metadata) and information derived from subsequent data&#xD;processing and analyses (i.e., &#x201C;meta-information&#x201D; in the broadest sense) are essential for&#xD;understanding and using the increasingly complex and voluminous data and information.&#xD;The concepts of meta-information, in general, and metadata, in particular, have evolved in&#xD;concert with the increasing needs for functionality by the community. From a scientific&#xD;perspective, metadata may be characterized as having developed from initially supporting&#xD;data discovery; to facilitating acquisition, comprehension and utilization of data by&#xD;humans; and, most recently, to beginning to enable automated data discovery, ingestion,&#xD;processing and analysis via metadata-enabled scientific workflow systems. The continued&#xD;conceptual and operational developments in metadata required to support comprehensive&#xD;automated scientific workflow systems portend many challenges and opportunities. For&#xD;example, there are significant opportunities for collaboration among ecologists and&#xD;computer scientists in developing domain-specific controlled vocabularies and ontologies&#xD;that provide the basis for semantic mediation&#x2014;the &#x201C;glue&#x201D; technologies that enable&#xD;automated data discovery, ingestion, processing and analysis. Similarly, there are&#xD;opportunities for computer scientists and engineers to develop new mechanisms that&#xD;support automated metadata encoding&#x2014;such as providing the information that would be&#xD;necessary to understand the end-to-end flow of sensor data from in situ data collection,&#xD;streaming through quality assurance filtering, aggregation, transformation and additional&#xD;processing, analysis, and publication of digital products. As the technologies mature, we&#xD;still have many sociological barriers to overcome including the needs for increased&#xD;attention to software usability testing and engineering to enhance user-friendliness of&#xD;metadata management software, new capital investments in ecological data archives,&#xD;and increasing the metadata management benefit&#x2013;cost ratio for the average scientist via&#xD;incentives and enabling tools.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Eco_Informatics_J folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002709</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Miglarese, A. H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sanchez, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>LaVoi, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Goss, H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Teaming up for accuracy: Federal, state, and local agencies collaborate on a compatible coastal information system</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geo Info Systems</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>8</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>16-22</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geo Info Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>oceanography and gis, coastal GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Turning the tide: joining forces to combat coastal disasters. Multiple sources exist for hazards-related data and information, but many of these are not easily accessible to, or useable by, coastal managers and local planners</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003975</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Miller, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mills, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Edwards, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bryan, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Marsh, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hobbs, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mitchell, H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>A robust surface matching technique for integrated monitoring of coastal geohazards</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>109-123</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, Surface matching, LiDAR, laser scanning, coastal erosion</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>At the dynamic coastal fringe, numerous processes interact with local morphology. In&#xD;soft-cliff environments, this can often lead to the occurrence of coastal geohazards. These&#xD;can pose a major threat to property and cultural heritage, and an effective monitoring&#xD;strategy is therefore essential. While contemporary monitoring techniques have been&#xD;applied, these are often unsuitable in isolation. This paper presents an integrated&#xD;approach, with the development ofweighted surfacematching software enabling reliable&#xD;dataset fusion and multi-temporal change detection, even where significant surface&#xD;differences exist. Evaluation of this approach is presented and discussed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Marine_Geodesy_MCGIS5/coastal_geohazards.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003990</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Milligan, J. </AUTHOR><AUTHOR>O&apos;riordan, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Governance for sustainable coastal futures</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>499-509</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal governance; coastal policy; shoreline management plans (SMPs); sustainable coasts</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The mobile nature of soft coasts means that coastal communities face uncertainty in their property values and peace of mind when the existing coastal defense is lowered or removed. The acceptance by the U.K. government that coastal realignment in areas of low population density and limited ecological value is unavoidable means that the current state of affairs, where coastal residents have broadly come to assume that they will be defended if they make enough fuss, cannot continue. The government is currently unwilling to confront this consternation and continues to refuse to pay compensation for lost property value. This is creating an outcry over loss of fairness of treatment. This dispute raises important questions of governance for coastal change. This participatory research project worked closely with English Nature, North Norfolk District Council, local residents associations, the Environment Agency, and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. What emerged in the analysis were unresolved tensions between national strategic frameworks, emerging planning arrangements, changing economic assessments, and the desirability of delivering, through a number of public and voluntary agencies, local flexibility in participation and in coastal design. This article reports on the research process, the challenges for coastal governance, and the scope for creative partnerships between science, planning, policy delivery, and public acceptance.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>coastal_governance.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002954</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Milliman, J. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1992</YEAR><TITLE>Management of the coastal zone: Impact of onshore activities on the coastal environment</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Hs&#xFC;, K. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Thiede, J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Use and Misuse of the Seafloor</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>New York</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</PUBLISHER><PAGES>213-227</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE Papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004131</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Mimura, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Asia-Pacific Coasts and Their Management: States of Environment</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Haq, B. U.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Systems and Continental Margins</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Springer</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Dordrecht, The Netherlands</PUBLISHER><PAGES>365 pp.</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Asia-Pacific Coasts and Their Management: States of Environment</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ISBN>978-1-4020-3626-2</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal zone management, Asia, Pacific, climate change, sea level rise</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>&quot;This book gives an overview of the state-of-the-art understanding on the drivers, state, and responses to coastal environmental changes in the Asia-Pacific region. It provides excellent perspectives on current and anticipated environmental changes in the region&apos;s coastal areas, to researchers, students, policy makers, coastal managers and other stakeholders.&quot;</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the book</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002177</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Miura, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Moriya, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1992/93</YEAR><TITLE>On the completeness of visual operations for a semantic data model</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Data Knowl. Eng.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>9</VOLUME><PAGES>19-44</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Data and Knowledge Engineering</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>databases, data models, data manipulation languages, visual languages, expressive power</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder, general geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004286</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Morrison, K. K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Snow-Cutter, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Toward more integrated ocean governance in Massachusetts: A progress report</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>36</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>412-430</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>governance; marine spatial planning; Massachusetts; ocean management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Since 2000, recent proposals for new offshore uses such as wind and wave energy projects and liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals have highlighted areas where the Commonwealth of Massachusetts&apos; ocean management process could be improved in order to move away from the first come, first served approach the state has historically taken to a more coordinated ocean governance regime. Massachusetts proposes to convert the largely reactive case-by-case permitting system to a more proactive governance regime. This article will review past efforts under two main regulatory frameworks, the Public Waterfront Act and the Ocean Sanctuaries Act, propose six key components of a planning approach, discuss recent legislative history, and reflect on Massachusetts&apos; experience to date through Cicin-Sain&apos;s (1990) &#x201C;Factors Conducive to Ocean Management Initiatives.&#x201D; Initially proposed over fifteen years ago, in a review of California&apos;s Ocean Management efforts, Cicin-Sain (1990) described &#x201C;four major variables that influence the likelihood that ocean management initiatives will emerge and be sustained in particular states.&#x201D; They include: (1) Degree of Severity of Ocean and Coastal Governance Problems and the Role of Focusing Events, (2) Political Readiness, (3) Governmental Readiness, and (4) State Ocean Heritage and Popular Opinion Variables.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>ocean_governance_MA.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002964</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Morrison, R. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Naqasima, M. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Fiji&apos;s great Astrolabe Lagoon: Baseline study and management issues for a pristine marine environment</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>617-636</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE, baseline survey to match Fagatele Bay</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;&#xD;first page only</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001973</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Mossa, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Review of &quot;Coastal Problems: Geomorphology, Ecology, and Soceity at the Coast&quot; by Heatherr Viles and Tom Spencerrr</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Annals AAG</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>85</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>742-743</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>applied geography, coastal ecology, coastal geomorphology, coastal management, coastal and marine geography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002584</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Mossa, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McLean, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1997</YEAR><TITLE>Channel planform and land cover changes on a mined river floodplain</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Appl. Geog.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>17</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>43-54</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Applied Geography</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>channel planform change, floodplain land cover, fluvial geomorphology, GIS, gravel and sand mining, coastal and marine geography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder &quot;Mossa&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002585</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Mossa, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nakashima, L. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1989</YEAR><TITLE>Changes along a seawall and natural beaches: Fourchon, LA</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Proceedings of Sixth Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management/ASCE</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Charleston, SC</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PAGES>3723-3737</PAGES><DATE>July 11-14, 1989</DATE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>shoreline and beach morphology, coastal and marine geography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder &quot;Mossa&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001899</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Murphy, L. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Smith, T. G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Submerged in the past: Mapping the beguiling waters of Florida&apos;s Biscayne and Dry Tortugas National Parks</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geo Info Systems</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>5</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>26-33</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geo Info Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine GIS, oceanographic GIS, ArcView</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Biscayne and Dry Tortugas National Parks have been the subject of numerous small-area surveys, but have lacked the integrated database needed by resrouce managers and researchers to adequately map the area. Since 1993 the National Park Service has been conducting surveys designed to provide a comprehensive, cumulative natural and cutural-resource inventory accessible through geographic database software. Thse underwater remote-sensing surveys are some of the first to be designed specifically for GIS applications and will be used to help preserve the maritime, cultural, and natural history submerged in the Florida Straits.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003214</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Murty, T. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Guest editorial</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>25</VOLUME><PAGES>1</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, coastal GIS, marine GIS, special issue</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have pdf file - intro.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002586</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Nakashima, L. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mossa, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1991</YEAR><TITLE>Response of natural and seawall-backed beaches to recent hurricanes on the Bayou Lafourche headland, Louisiana</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Z. Geomorph. N. F.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>239-256</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Zeitschrift f&#xFC;r Geomorphologie N. F.</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder &quot;Mossa&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004056</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Nitsche, F. O.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jacobs, S. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Larter, R. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gohl, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Bathymetry of the Amundsen Sea continental shelf: Implications for geology, oceanography, and glaciology</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>8</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>Q10009, doi:10.1029/2007GC001694</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>data brief</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Jed&apos;s thesis, data brief, publication example, Samoa, West Antarctica; continental shelf; bathymetry; seafloor morphology</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The Amundsen Sea continental shelf is one of the most remote areas of coastal Antarctica and was&#xD;relatively unexplored until the late 1980s. Over the last two decades, increased oceanographic and&#xD;geological interest has led to several cruises that resulted in sufficient bathymetric data to compile a fairly&#xD;detailed regional map of the Amundsen continental shelf. We have combined available multibeam and&#xD;single-beam bathymetry data from various sources and created a new regional bathymetry of the&#xD;Amundsen Sea continental shelf and margin. Deep trough systems that dominate the inner shelf are aligned&#xD;with present glaciers and separated by shallower ridges. Shaped by paleo-ice streams, these features merge&#xD;into a small number of broader troughs on the middle shelf and shoal seaward. They now serve as conduits&#xD;and reservoirs for relatively warm Circumpolar Deep Water. This new compilation is a major improvement&#xD;over previously available regional maps and should aid the numerical modeling of ocean circulation, the&#xD;reconstructions of paleo-ice streams, and the refinement of ice sheet models.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>data_brief_ex_Amundsen_bathy.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003534</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Nogueras-Iso, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zarazaga-Soria, F. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bejar, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Alvarez, P. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Muro-Medrano, P. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>OGC Catalog Services: A key element the development of spatial data infrastructures</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>31</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>199-209</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers and Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>special issue on AGILE, Association of Geographic Information Laboratories in Europe, GIScience in Europe</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Catalogs; Metadata; Interoperability; Geographic information; OpenGIS; SDI, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, CMRC</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - AGILE_CompGEosci--&gt;OGC_catalog.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003976</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>O Tuama, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hamre, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Design and implementation of a distributed GIS portal for oil spill and harmful algal bloom monitoring in the marine environment</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>145-168</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, web GIS, Open Geospatial Consortium, data harmonization, metadata, web</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>map service, spatial data infrastructure, harmful algal bloom, oil spill, INSPIRE, GMES</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>A web-based distributed system for monitoring and forecasting of the marine&#xD;environment has been developed in line with INfrastructure for SPatial InfoRmation&#xD;in Europe (INSPIRE) and Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES)&#xD;recommendations for a European Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI). This system, called&#xD;DISPRO, enables integration and distribution of multi-source data from satellites,&#xD;aircraft, and in situ instruments, as well as results from numerical models. Geographic&#xD;data and metadata are stored on a set of distributed computer nodes and retrieved and&#xD;integrated by a web GIS client by means of Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Web&#xD;Map Server (WMS) technologies. A profile of ISO 19115 was developed for metadata&#xD;handling, using eXtensible Markup Language (XML) as a platform independent&#xD;encoding mechanism. DISPRO has been demonstrated in six European coastal zone&#xD;and ocean regions in the spring and summer of 2005. The overall positive experiences&#xD;of both service providers and end users indicate that the system should be further&#xD;developed into an operational GMES service.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Marine_Geodesy_MCGIS5/DISPRO2007.pdf&#xD;peer-reviewed by Dawn</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003100</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Oertel, G. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Overman, K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Allen, T. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Carlson, C. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Porter, J. H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>Hypsographic analysis of coastal bay environments using integrated remote sensing techniques, Great Machipongo Bay, Virginia, USA</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>EMRI</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sixth International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Charleston, South Carolina</PLACE_PUBLISHED><VOLUME>2</VOLUME><PAGES>269-276</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, dGPS, bathymetry, echosounding</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Orange folder, &quot;AAG 2001&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003895</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Oldow, J. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Walker, J. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Aiken, C. L. V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Xu, X.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Digital acquisition, analysis, and visualization in the earth sciences</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>87</VOLUME><NUMBER>35</NUMBER><PAGES>351-352</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>MMI, ICAN, GEON, cyberinfrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Perhaps the greatest obstacle to building&#xD;an integrated Earth science cyberinfrastructure&#xD;is the disconnect between the collection&#xD;of field data and the construction of an&#xD;associated digital database. This was recognized&#xD;as a major issue by participants of the&#xD;Integrated Solid Earth Science CyberInfrastructure&#xD;workshop held at the University of&#xD;Kansas in 2003, and led to a workshop spanning&#xD;three days in April 2006, sponsored&#xD;jointly by the U.S. National Science Foundation&#xD;and GEON, the Geosciences Network&#xD;(http://www.geongrid.org).&#xD;Twenty-eight participants with backgrounds&#xD;in a broad range of disciplines from institutions&#xD;in the United States were joined by representatives&#xD;from Canada, the United Kingdom,&#xD;and China to explore the motivations and&#xD;issues surrounding digital acquisition, analysis,&#xD;and visualization through a series of demonstrations,&#xD;breakout sessions, and plenary discussions.&#xD;The workshop participants recognized that&#xD;acquisition and depiction of field data is the&#xD;cornerstone of the solid Earth sciences and&#xD;that these data provide the context for most&#xD;geologic inquiries. Participants also recognized&#xD;that the existing propensity to rely on&#xD;analog technology for field data collection,&#xD;production of geologic maps, and data analysis&#xD;presents a barrier to incorporating field&#xD;observations into integrated scientific inquiry.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>geon_workshop.pdf&#xD;see Kumar, 2006, geoinformatics06.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003303</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Paul, J. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Copeland, J. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Charpentier, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>August, P. V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hollister, J. W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Overview of GIS applications in estuarine monitoring and assessment research</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>63-72</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - estuaryGIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004013</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Peachavanish, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Karimi, H. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Ontological engineering for interpreting geospatial queries</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>115-130</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>Despite advancements in geographic information system (GIS) technology, the&#xD;efficient and effective utilization of GIS to solve geospatial problems is a daunting&#xD;process requiring specialized knowledge and skills. Two of the most important&#xD;and burdensome tasks in this process are interpretation of geospatial queries and&#xD;mapping the interpreted results into geospatial data models and geoprocessing&#xD;operations. With the current state of GIS, there exists a gap between the knowledge&#xD;user&#x2019;s possess and the knowledge and skills they need to utilize GIS for solving&#xD;problems. Currently, users resort to training and practice on GIS technology or&#xD;involving GIS experts. Neither of these options is optimal and there is a need for a&#xD;new approach that automates geoprocessing tasks using GIS technology. This paper&#xD;presents an ontological engineering methodology that uses multiple ontologies and&#xD;the mappings among them to automate certain tasks related to interpretation of&#xD;geospatial queries and mapping the interpreted results into geospatial data models&#xD;and geoprocessing operations. The presented methodology includes conceptualization&#xD;of geospatial queries, knowledge representation for queries, techniques for relating&#xD;elements in different ontologies, and an algorithm that uses ontologies to map queries&#xD;to geoprocessing operations.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; ont_engr.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004110</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Post, A. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The application of physical surrogates to predict the distribution of marine benthic organisms</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>161-179</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>benthic habitat mapping, benthic habitat classification, seafloor mapping, Samoa, Tonga, NOAA, benthic communities, Australia, marine reserve design, marine protected area design, benthic biota, seabed biota, BTM</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The identification of marine habitats based on physical parameters is increasingly important for&#xD;marine reserve design, allowing characterisation of habitat types over much wider areas than is&#xD;possible from often patchy biological data. Marine management zones often contain a wide array of&#xD;physical environments, which may not be captured in the biological sampling effort. The mismatch&#xD;between biological and physical information leads to uncertainty in the application of bio-physical&#xD;relationships at the broader management scale. In this study, a case study from northern Australia is&#xD;used to demonstrate a methodology for defining uncertainties which result from the extrapolation of&#xD;bio-physical associations across areas where detailed biological data is absent. In addition,&#xD;uncertainties relating to the interpolation of physical data sets and that resulting from the cluster&#xD;analysis applied to the physical data are calculated and mapped, providing marine managers with&#xD;greater robustness in their analysis of habitat distributions.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>benthic_hab_australia.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003927</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Poulter, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Halpin, P. N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Raster modelling of coastal flooding from sea-level rise</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>DOI: 10.1080/13658810701371858</VOLUME><PAGES>1-16</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Sea-level rise; Lidar; Horizontal resolution; Connectivity; Coastal</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>flooding; North Carolina; GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>As rates of sea-level rise continue to increase due to climate change, land planners&#xD;require accurate spatial analyses on the extent and timing of coastal flooding and&#xD;associated hazards. Digital elevation data used to evaluate coastal vulnerability&#xD;to flooding are available at various horizontal and vertical resolutions. However,&#xD;the quality of digital elevation models (DEM) used in environmental assessment&#xD;can significantly affect the detection of topographic features and the magnitude&#xD;of hydrological processes. We used lidar elevation data in coastal North&#xD;Carolina, USA to investigate the effects of horizontal resolution and connectivity&#xD;on the extent and timing of flooding from sea-level rise. We found that the rate&#xD;and extent of inundation were dependent on horizontal resolution and&#xD;assumptions made on hydrological connectivity. The variation in flood extent&#xD;was much larger (760km2) at low sea-level projections (,0.4 m) than at high sealevel&#xD;projections (.,0.9 m, 114km2) due to the effect of hydrological corrections&#xD;on the coarse-scale DEM and topographic complexity at low elevations. Lidar&#xD;elevation data provide a significant advance in mapping potential coastal&#xD;flooding, but the extent and timing of inundation are sensitive to horizontal&#xD;resolution and the modelling of hydrological connectivity.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>coastal_flooding.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002818</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Pratson, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Divins, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Butler, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Metzger, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sharman, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Steele, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Berggren, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Holcombe, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ramos, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Exposing the U.S. coastal zone</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>80</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>37, 42</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine GIS, oceanography and GIS, coastal GIS, bathymetry, databases, GMT</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004204</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Prigent, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fontenelle, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rochet, M.-J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Trenkel, V. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Using cognitive maps to investigate fishers&apos; ecosystem objectives and knowledge</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>450-462</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal GIS, traditional ecological knowledge of sorts</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper presents a survey of French Eastern English Channel fishers&#x2019; observations of the past and&#xD;current state of the marine ecosystem and their wishes for the future, as a first step towards formulating&#xD;management objectives. Twenty-nine semi-directive interviews were carried out in June 2006 among&#xD;fishers and shellfish farmers. Cognitive maps proved useful to formalise their experience and knowledge.&#xD;Most interviewees mentioned a decrease of the resource in recent years and pointed out the presence of&#xD;several problems, such as pollution, degradation of the ocean floor and harmful impacts of human activities,&#xD;including fishing. The indicators used by the fishers as the basis to form their opinion were&#xD;similar to those generally used by scientists for assessing the state of exploited marine populations and&#xD;communities (average fish length, CPUE, fished biomass.); additional indicators were the timing and&#xD;duration of fishing seasons.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>cognitive_maps_fishers.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004218</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Proctor, J. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Ethics in geography: Giving moral form to the geographical imagination</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Area</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>8-18</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Area</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ethics and GIS, ethical considerations</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Geographers have become increasingly interested in questions of ethics. In this&#xD;paper, I introduce the scope and major concerns of ethics, briefly reviewing recent&#xD;literature as a means of situating geography&apos;s potential contribution. I then link ethics to the&#xD;geographical imagination by developing a twofold schema representing geography&apos;s&#xD;ontological project and epistemological process, an approach that unites existing&#xD;professional and substantive ethical concerns among geographers. Examples of recent work&#xD;by geographers in these areas are noted. I close with a set of broad questions at the&#xD;interface of ethics and geography worthy of further reflection.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>proctor_ethics_geog.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002793</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Psuty, N. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Steinberg, P. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wright, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal and marine geography</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Gaile, G. L.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Willmott, C. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geography in America at the Dawn of the 21st Century</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>New York</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Oxford University Press</PUBLISHER><PAGES>314-325</PAGES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003967</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Purves, R. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Clough, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jones, C. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Arampatzis, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bucher, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Finch, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fu, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Joho, H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Syed, A. K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vaid, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yang, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>The design and implementation of SPIRIT: A spatially aware search engine for information retrieval on the Internet</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>21</VOLUME><NUMBER>6-7</NUMBER><PAGES>717-745</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>geographic information retrieval, geographic ontology, spatial indexing, spatial relevance ranking, information retrieval, ICAN, spatially-aware search, metadata; SPIRIT (Spatially Aware Information Retrievel on the Internet)</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES><URL>http://www.geo-spirit.org/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001334</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Quinton, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1988</YEAR><TITLE>Epistemology and ontology</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Bullock, A., Stallybrass, O., and Trombley, S.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>London</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Fontana</PUBLISHER><PAGES>279, 605-606</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>philosophy of science, Geog 227</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003819</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Rajabifard, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Binns, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Masser, I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Williamson, I.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>20</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>727-741</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>research article</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>spatial data infrastructures, SDI, sub-national government, private sector, enabling platform, spatial data management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002179</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ram, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Intelligent database design using the unifying semantic model</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Inf. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>29</VOLUME><PAGES>191-206</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Information Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic modeling, intelligent database design, conceptual modeling, user interface graphical database design, schema integration</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder, general geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004397</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Richardson, A. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Poloczanska, E. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Under-resourced, under threat</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Science</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>320</VOLUME><PAGES>1294-1295</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>policy forum</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean science, funding, ocean studies board, IPCC, climate change</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The recent IPCC (Intergovernmental&#xD;Panel on Climate Change) Fourth Assessment&#xD;Report (1) noted 28,586 significant&#xD;biological changes in terrestrial systems&#xD;but only 85 from marine and freshwater&#xD;systems. Of these few observations from&#xD;aquatic systems, 99% were consistent with&#xD;global warming, which suggests that aquatic&#xD;systems may be extremely vulnerable to climate&#xD;change. Here, we argue that the dearth&#xD;of documented changes from marine systems&#xD;is an artifact of the distribution of global science&#xD;funding, the difficulty of disentangling&#xD;multiple stressors from relatively poorly sampled&#xD;systems, the disconnect between marine&#xD;and terrestrial ecology, the way marine ecologists&#xD;report research findings, and limitations&#xD;in the existing IPCC process.&#xD;Marine research is under-resourced compared&#xD;with that on land. If the number of publications&#xD;(1996 to 2004, Thomson Scientific&#xD;ISI) is used as a measure, less than 11% of&#xD;published papers in each of the fields of ecology,&#xD;conservation biology, and biodiversity&#xD;research deal with marine systems (2&#x2013;4). This&#xD;bias arises in part because investigating the&#xD;ocean realm is generally difficult, resourceintensive,&#xD;and expensive.&#xD;Observational capacity is also much lower&#xD;in the oceans than in terrestrial systems.&#xD;Humans are far removed from much of the&#xD;ocean expanse, which reduces the likelihood of&#xD;observing changes there. Research forays into&#xD;the oceans are transitory and concentrated in&#xD;coastal waters. Inaccessibility of most marine&#xD;systems precludes studies by amateur naturalists,&#xD;who have provided valuable terrestrial data&#xD;sets on the timing of blossoms or arrival of&#xD;migratory birds. Satellite observing systems&#xD;are generally restricted to the sea surface, and&#xD;even shallow marine ecosystems such as seagrass&#xD;meadows and coral reefs remain hidden.&#xD;There are several unique avenues for generating&#xD;marine time series. Fishery records and&#xD;fish otoliths (used to estimate fish age and&#xD;growth, akin to tree rings) provide information&#xD;over interannual to decadal scales. Reconstructions&#xD;from sedimentary records and coral&#xD;cores afford insight over centennial and longer&#xD;time scales.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>OceanScience.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003889</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ricketts, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Harrison, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal and ocean management in Canada: Moving into the 21st century</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><PAGES>5-22</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Canada Oceans Action Plan, integrated coastal and ocean management in</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Canada, Large Ocean Management Areas</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>In the years since the first Canadian Special Issue of the then Coastal Zone Management&#xD;Journal in 1983, the development of Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management in&#xD;Canada has moved at speeds ranging from glacial to hectic. This article presents an&#xD;overview of this development, and attempts to tie together the various articles in this&#xD;Special Issue of the Coastal Management Journal. With the passage of the Canada&#xD;Oceans Act in 1997, the initiation of an Oceans Strategy in 2002, and the development&#xD;of Phase I of the Oceans Action Plan in 2005, Canada has finally begun to move into the&#xD;21st century with a coherent plan for Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management.&#xD;Furthermore, with its ocean-to-shore perspective on Integrated Management for&#xD;Large Ocean Management Areas, Canada has an opportunity to take a leading&#xD;global role in the implementation of a truly integrated, multistakeholder management&#xD;strategy.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>CZM_Canada.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>1</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001900</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Rickman, T. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Miller, A. H.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>A Categorized Bibliography of Coastal Applications of Geographic Information Systems</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Madison, Wisconsin</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Sea Grant Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison</PUBLISHER><PAGES>34</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and coastal oceanography, marine GIS, GIS and oceanography, deepsea GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the book - 4 copies</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001513</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Robinson, G. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1991</YEAR><TITLE>The UK digital Marine Atlas Project: An evolutionary approach towards a Marine Information System</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Intl. Hydrogr. Rev.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Hydrographic Review</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>68</VOLUME><PAGES>39-51</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Red folder, geography/GIS/general oceanography</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004279</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Rodr&#xCD;guez, R. E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Community involvement in marine protected areas: The case of Puerto Morelos reef, Mexico</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Env. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>88</VOLUME><PAGES>1151-1160</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Environmental Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Integrated coastal management; Marine protected area; Coral reef; Tourism; Mexico, MPA</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The case of Puerto Morelos reef marine protected area (MPA) provides an example of a community-based marine conservation&#xD;initiative to protect a coral reef ecosystem. The establishment and maintenance of this MPA had five stages: (a) identification of&#xD;community leaders who would participate in the project; (b) generation of consensus on the need to protect the reef through discussions&#xD;among local stakeholders, NGOs and reef scientists; (c) involvement of government agencies in establishing the status of a MPA;&#xD;(d) take-over of decision-making by centralized governmental agencies; and (e) continuous problem-solving process between the&#xD;government and stakeholders. Over a 9-year period, the control of the MPA was taken over by government and stakeholders&#x2019;&#xD;participation downgraded from a decision-making to an advice-giving role. Government shortcomings to manage this MPA could be&#xD;circumvented via collaborative co-management. Given the small population size of the community and strong sense of ownership, there&#xD;was a high level of participation in the decision-making processes and scientific advisors are present in the area.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>community_MPA.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003264</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Rodr&#xED;guez-Martinez, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ort&#xED;z, L. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Coral reef education in schools of Quintana Roo, Mexico</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>1061-1068</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef conservation, sanctuaries, SSE, education</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Pile of papers under Snoopy paperweight</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002811</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ruddle, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>The context of policy design for existing community-based fisheries management systems in the Pacific Islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>105-126</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine resource management, southwest Pacific, MRM, sabbatical</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder - &quot;MRM papers&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002812</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Ruddle, K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Introduction to the special issue on a modern role for traditional coastal-marine resource management systems in the Pacific Islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>99-103</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine resource management, southwest Pacific, MRM, sabbatical</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder - &quot;MRM papers&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004318</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sahoo, S. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sheth, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Henson, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Semantic provenance for eScience: Managing the deluge of scientific data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Internet Computing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>46-54</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>IEE Internet Computing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>cyberinfrastructure, eScience, MMI, ICAN, CISG, ACM, metadata, XML, making scientific data sets easier to find</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Provenance information in eScience is metadata that&#x2019;s critical to effectively manage the exponentially increasing volumes of scientific data from industrial-scale experiment protocols. Semantic provenance, based on domain-specific provenance ontologies, lets software applications unambiguously interpret data in the correct context. The semantic provenance framework for eScience data comprises expressive provenance information and domain-specific provenance ontologies and applies this information to data management. The authors&#x2019; &#x201C;two degrees of separation&#x201D; approach advocates the creation of high-quality provenance information using specialized services. In contrast to workflow engines generating provenance information as a core functionality, the specialized provenance services are integrated into a scientific workflow on demand. This article describes an implementation of the semantic provenance framework for glycoproteomics.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Semantic_Provenance_for_eScience.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003830</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Salas, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Marcos, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Neto, J. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Patricio, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Perez-Ruzafa, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Marques, J. C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>User-friendly guide for using benthic ecological indicators in coastal and marine quality assessment</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>49</VOLUME><PAGES>308-331</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>benthic habitat mapping, benthic habitat classification, seafloor mapping, Samoa, Tonga, NOAA, benthic communities, Portugal, Spain</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Experience demonstrates that none of the available measures on biological effects of pollution&#xD;should be considered ideal. The use of a single approach does not seem appropriate due to the&#xD;complexity inherent in assessing the environmental quality of a system. Rather, this should be&#xD;evaluated by combining a suite of indices providing complementary information.&#xD;Having this in mind, a key table is proposed in this work with the aim of helping managers and&#xD;authorities of coastal areas in selecting the most suitable ecological indicators taking into account the&#xD;type of disturbance and the data available. Such key includes numerous indices based on benthic&#xD;invertebrate fauna information, because in the case of coastal and transitional waters ecosystems&#xD;there is a clear preference for benthic communities, which integrate environmental conditions and&#xD;changes in an a very effective way if we want to monitor long-term responses and site-specific&#xD;impacts.&#xD;The development of this key was based not only on theoretical approaches, but also on results&#xD;from its application using data bases corresponding to different geographical areas (the Mondego&#xD;estuary, in the North-Western Coast of Portugal, and Mar Menor coastal lagoon, Escombreras&#xD;basin, and Cabo Tin&#x2DC; oso in the South-Eastern coast of Spain).&#xD;Some recommendations are provided with regard to the most adequate application of the indices,&#xD;as for example, in what situations it is not advisable the use of some of them, depending on the type&#xD;of disturbance or the level of taxonomic identification of the organisms.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>benthic_ecol_indicators.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002789</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sallenger, A. H., Jr.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Krabill, W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Brock, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Swift, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jansen, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Manizade, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Richmond, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hampton, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Eslinger, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Airborne laser study quantifies El Ni&#xF1;o-induced coastal change</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>80</VOLUME><NUMBER>8</NUMBER><PAGES>89, 92-93</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>airborne laser, USGS, NOAA, airborne topographic mapper (ATM), coastal clearinghouse</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;See also coastal.er.usgs.gov/response/wa-or/</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003687</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Salmeron, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Canas, J. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fajardo, I.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Are expert users always better searchers? Interaction of expertise and semantic grouping in hypertext search tasks</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Behav. Info. Tech.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>24</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>471-475</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Behaviour &amp; Information Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ontology, controlled vocabulary, MMI, marine metadata, hypertext search, human computer interaction</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The facilitative effect of expertise in hypertext information retrieval (IR) tasks has been widely reported in related literature. However, recent theories of human expertise question the robustness of this result, since previous works have not fully considered the interaction between user and system characteristics. In this study, the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH) is considered in order to predict that the effect of expertise in IR would appear only when the user and system characteristics can be combined successfully. Results from an experiment revealed that expert users outperformed novice users in IR when the elements of a system interface are organized semantically, but not when organized randomly. Results are discussed in the framework of the CAH supporting the interactive nature of human behaviour in HCI.</ABSTRACT></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003350</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Salmona, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>The regional seas in the 21st century: The need for data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>935-964</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean regions, regionalization, regional seas, a regional seas dossier</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper is meant as introducing A Regional Seas Dossier by giving a view of how the data&#xD;bank, which the Dossier was based on, was designed and operated. The breakdown on the&#xD;regional sea management is concerns 149 States of the existing 156 independent States, and 45&#xD;no sovereign territories. It is based on a spectrum of national data, including:(i) the extent of&#xD;the coastal, island and archipelagic State, and that of the non independent spaces; (ii) the&#xD;population; (iii) the coast length; (iv) the extent of the exclusive economic zone ; (v) the land&#xD;coastline pressure indicator; and (vi) the coastal human pressure indicator. It consists in tables,&#xD;maps, and diagrams. First, the methodological features are concisely discussed, then the&#xD;individual components of the Dossier are presented, and finally the need to implement the&#xD;information systems on the regional seas, and on the regional scale of ocean management, is&#xD;emphasised.</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - regional_seas_data.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004024</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Schuurman, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>AAG Annals</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>96</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>726-739</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>review paper</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>critical GIS, formalization, GIScience, ontology, public participation GIS, PPGIS, data models, ontologies, epistemology, critique of GIS</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004151</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Schwering, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Approaches to semantic similarity measurement for geo-spatial data: A survey</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>5-30</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic properties, semantic interoperability, geospatial</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Semantic similarity is central for the functioning of semantically enabled processing of geospatial data. It is used to measure the degree of potential semantic interoperability between data or different geographic information systems (GIS). Similarity is essential for dealing with vague data queries, vague concepts or natural language and is the basis for semantic information retrieval and integration. The choice of similarity measurement influences strongly the conceptual design and the functionality of a GIS. The goal of this article is to provide a survey presentation on theories of semantic similarity measurement and review how these approaches &#x2013; originally developed as psychological models to explain human similarity judgment &#x2013; can be used in geographic information science. According to their knowledge representation and notion of similarity we classify existing similarity measures in geometric, feature, network, alignment and transformational models. The article reviews each of these models and outlines its notion of similarity and metric properties. Afterwards, we evaluate the semantic similarity models with respect to the requirements for semantic similarity measurement between geospatial data. The article concludes by comparing the similarity measures and giving general advice how to choose an appropriate semantic similarity measure. Advantages and disadvantages point to their suitability for different tasks.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003531</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Shabica, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Shoreline erosion and coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><NUMBER>12</NUMBER><PAGES>89</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>soapbox, Great Lakes</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004063</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Shah, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Treby, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>May, V.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Walsh, P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Bridging the divide between academia and practitioners: Training coastal zone managers</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>50</VOLUME><PAGES>859-871</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>This article describes how on the MSc Coastal Zone Management (CZM) course a range of&#xD;teaching strategies have been used to bridge the gap between academia and practice in order to&#xD;develop students who are well equipped for the workplace. The content and delivery of the course has&#xD;been guided by practitioners in the field, including placement host and employers, to ensure that&#xD;skills development is embedded into the curriculum. Examples of best practices are discussed with the&#xD;view to providing recommendations for postgraduate level courses requiring a fine balance of&#xD;academic content and vocational relevance.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>training_CZmgrs.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004351</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Shapshak, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Combining GIS and semantic technology to create a cultural visualizer</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Directions Magazine</SECONDARY_TITLE><DATE>September 29, 2008</DATE><TYPE_OF_WORK>online article</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Directions Magazine</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic properties, semantic interoperability, semantic web, ontology, Spain, virtual reality, augmented reality</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The CINeSpace project in Spain combines semantic technology with a GIS augmented reality device to immerse tourists in an area&apos;s cultural heritage by transporting the user to the past through the use of multimedia archives. A rentable mobile device combines a PDA-type device with a GIS interface displayed on a touch screen to help users navigate and select multimedia content, as well as video binoculars to create the augmented reality effects. GPS is used to establish a user&apos;s position within approximately 10 meters. Markerless optical tracking, which uses algorithms to compare reference images of real objects to images captured in real time to produce the current location and orientation, is then used to establish a more defined location. Next, inertial tracking is used by mathematically integrating the equations of motion to find the current position from acceleration data provided by integrated circuit accelerometers. Lastly, additional orientation information from solid state accelerometers measures the direction of the force created by the earth&apos;s gravitational field on microscopic cantilevers. An electronic three-dimensional compass provides the orientation of the device relative to the earth&apos;s magnetic field. These methods allow the device to provide position and orientation information so historical film clips can be layered over the real world to create an altered reality. A challenge in creating the device is the need to allow the user to access a wide variety of geo-referenced information while making the device small and portable, and allowing the user to annotate information in an efficient manner. To address needs, a novel semantic GIS technology has been developed at Tracasa SA, called GeoConcepts ontology.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>geosemantic_visualizer.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=2885&amp;trv=1</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002976</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sharman, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Metzger, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Campagnoli, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Butler, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Berggren, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Divins, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Steele, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>GEODAS: A hydro/bathy data management system</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Surv. Land Inf. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>58</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>141-146</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Surveying and Land Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>marine and coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS, special issue, marine geophysics, marine geology</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002250</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherin, A. G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Edwardson, K. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>A coastal information system for the Atlantic provinces of Canada</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Third Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Seattle, Washington</PLACE_PUBLISHED><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>CIS, entity relationship, SPOT satellite imagery</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Red folder, general GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002741</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1988</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal geomorphology</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geogr. Rev.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>78</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>116-118</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geographical Review</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002745</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1991</YEAR><TITLE>Gravel beaches: Profile development on gravel beaches, Malin Head, Ireland</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nat. Geog. Res. Explor.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>7</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>442-452</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>National Geographic Research &amp; Exploration</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa, gravel beaches, storm and swell, sediment transport</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002742</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Problems of scale in the modeling and interpretation of coastal dunes</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>124</VOLUME><PAGES>339-349</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002743</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bauer, B. O.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal geomorphology through the looking glass</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geomorph.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>7</VOLUME><PAGES>225-249</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geomorphology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002744</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bauer, B. O.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>Dynamics of beach-dune systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Prog. Phys. Geog.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>17</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>413-447</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Progress in Physical Geography</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa, sediment transport, morphodynamics, sediment budget, characteristic form</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002748</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bauer, B. O.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Carter, R. W. G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jackson, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McCloskey, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Davison-Arnott, R. G. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gares, P. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jackson, N. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nordstrom, K. F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>The Aeolus Project: Measuring coastal wind and sediment systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>COASTAL DYNAMICS &apos;94 Proceedings</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Barcelona, Spain</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Division/ASCE</PUBLISHER><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><PAGES>476-487</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002750</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bauer, B. O.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gares, P. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jackson, D. W. T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1996</YEAR><TITLE>Wind blown sand at Castroville, California</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Engineering 1996 Proceedings, 25th International Conference</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Orlando, Florida</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Coastal Engineering Research Council/ASCE</PUBLISHER><VOLUME>Chapter 326</VOLUME><PAGES>4214-4226</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002747</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lyons, W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>Beach-state controls on aeolian sand delivery to coastal dunes</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Phys. Geog.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>15</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>381-395</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Physical Geography</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa, coastal dunes, coastal geomorphology, beach state, beach modeling</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002749</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nordstrom, K. F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jackson, N. L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Allen, J. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>Sediment mixing-depths on a low-energy reflective beach</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Coastal Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>10</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>297-305</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Coastal Research</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa, micro-tidal beach, estaurine beach, fluorescent-tracer sands, high-energy beaches, wave-based model, cross-shore sediment transport, turbulence, swash</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002746</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sherman, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Orford, J. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Carter, R. W. G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1993</YEAR><TITLE>Development of cusp-related, gravel size and shape facies at Malin Head, Ireland</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sedimentol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>40</VOLUME><PAGES>1139-1152</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sedimentology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal and marine geography, CoMa, beach gravels, sediment transport</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Purple folder, &quot;Sherman 1988-&apos;95&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003591</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Shi, W. Z.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ehlers, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Molenaar, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Uncertainties in integrated remote sensing and GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Remote Sensing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>14</NUMBER><PAGES>2911-2916</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Remote Sensing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>uncertainty, teaching, GEO 580, remote sensing</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>SARA Alert as of 9/25/05&#xD;This issue contains:&#xD;&#xD;Cover&#x9;&#xD;p. 2909&#x9;&#xD;&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=K750611687357G23&#xD;&#xD;Uncertainties in integrated remote sensing and GIS&#x9;&#xD;p. 2911&#x9;&#xD;W. Z. Shi, M. Ehlers, M. Molenaar&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=W4L176V4Q7X13609&#xD;&#xD;Multivariate texture-based segmentation of remotely sensed imagery for extraction of objects and their uncertainty&#x9;&#xD;p. 2917&#x9;&#xD;Arko Lucieer, Alfred Stein, Peter Fisher&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=U577331226251326&#xD;&#xD;Complexity metrics to quantify semantic accuracy in segmented Landsat images&#x9;&#xD;p. 2937&#x9;&#xD;Alfred Stein, Kirsten de Beurs&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=U38524727L454687&#xD;&#xD;Quality assessment for geo-spatial objects derived from remotely sensed data&#x9;&#xD;p. 2953&#x9;&#xD;Qingming Zhan, Martien Molenaar, Klaus Tempfli, Wenzhong Shi&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=V6606742K430X030&#xD;&#xD;Landscape structure assessment with image grey-values and object-based classification at three spatial resolutions&#x9;&#xD;p. 2975&#x9;&#xD;E. Ivits, B. Koch, T. Blaschke, M. Jochum, P. Adler&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=W01624G66L87V05P&#xD;&#xD;Estimating and accommodating uncertainty through the soft classification of remote sensing data&#x9;&#xD;p. 2995&#x9;&#xD;M. A. Ibrahim, M. K. Arora, S. K. Ghosh&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=U6Q33R3QU1090152&#xD;&#xD;Improving land cover change estimates by accounting for classification errors&#x9;&#xD;p. 3009&#x9;&#xD;P. A. J. van Oort&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=KUJ33402U88L2535&#xD;&#xD;Reasoning about changes of land covers with fuzzy settings&#x9;&#xD;p. 3025&#x9;&#xD;X. M. Tang, W. Kainz, Y. Fang&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=J91Q58U1278X255T&#xD;&#xD;Spatial knowledge databases as applied to the detection of changes in urban land use&#x9;&#xD;p. 3047&#x9;&#xD;T. Y. Chou, T. C. Lei, S. Wan, L. S. Yang&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=H237H78500R6WP8Q&#xD;&#xD;Estimating the propagation error of DEM from higher-order interpolation algorithms&#x9;&#xD;p. 3069&#x9;&#xD;W. Z. Shi, Q. Q. Li, C. Q. Zhu&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=G762X5563114043P&#xD;&#xD;Error propagation analysis of DEM-based drainage basin delineation&#x9;&#xD;p. 3085&#x9;&#xD;J. Oksanen, T. Sarjakoski&#xD;&#xD;URL of article: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp?id=W5764766J18652W2&#xD;&#xD;Modelling uncertainties related to movements of objects through signatures&#x9;&#xD;p. 3103&#x9;&#xD;E. Besdok, H. M. Palancioglu</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002663</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sitarz, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Carbondale, Illinois</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>EarthPress</PUBLISHER><PAGES>321</PAGES><LABEL>HD 75.6 .A37 1994</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean GIS, coastal/marine GIS, GIS and oceanography, island GIS, UN, sustainable development</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002139</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Smith, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal protection in the Pacific island regions: Issues and needs</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>25</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>53-62</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean and Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Samoa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003292</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Smith, C. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Institutional mapping of Oregon coastal watershed management options</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>357-375</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Oregon Coastal Atlas, OCA, watersheds, salmon restoration, Clean Water Act</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Institutional mapping is a technique that builds on the logic of Geographic Information&#xD;Systems (GIS). In GIS, coverages placed over a base map show spatial relations. Social&#xD;institutions are more difficult to &#x2018;&#x2018;map&#x2019;&#x2019; physically. Institutional mapping uses three social&#xD;coverages&#x2014;scale, power, andcapital. Four sets of institutions affecting watershed management&#xD;&#x2014;salmon restoration, water quality improvement, forest management, andland -use&#xD;planning&#x2014;illustrate the institutional mapping process. Analysis indicates that water quality&#xD;institutions under the Clean Water Act (CWA) have a slightly higher ranking on scale, power,&#xD;andcapital. Based on these rankings, CWA requirements are predictedto have greater&#xD;potential for improving watershed health in coastal settings than institutions associated with&#xD;salmon restoration, forest management, or land-use planning. The differences are not large,&#xD;and overlapping goals for protecting salmon, improving water quality, sustainable forest&#xD;management, and effective land-use planning institutions offers the strongest prospect for&#xD;improved watershed health.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the pdf file - OR_coastmgt.pdf (in NSF--&gt;OCA)</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002142</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Smith, E. R. A. N.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Garcia, S. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Evolving California opinion on offshore oil development</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>41-56</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean and Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000000294</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Smith, R. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bidigare, R. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pr&#xE9;zelin, B. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Baker, K. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Brooks, J. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1987</YEAR><TITLE>Optical characterization of primary productivity across a coastal front</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Biol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Biology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>96</VOLUME><PAGES>575-591</PAGES><NOTES>Light blue binder, Miscellaneous tectonics, computer applications, oceanography</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000000187</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Smith, R. C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Pr&#xE9;zelin, B. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bidigare, R. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Baker, K. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1989</YEAR><TITLE>Bio-optical modeling of photosynthetic production in coastal waters</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Limnol. Oceanogr.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Limnology and Oceanography</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><NUMBER>8</NUMBER><PAGES>1524-1544</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>physical/biological oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Brown notebook, Geog. 104 Study Guide Readings, Summer 1991&#xD;Light blue binder, Miscellaneous tectonics, computer applications, oceanography</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002901</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Solomon, S. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Forbes, D. L.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal hazards and associated management issues on South Pacific islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>523-554</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE Papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002904</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>South, G. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Veitayaki, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>Capacity building in the South Pacific and the role of the marine studies programme at the University of the South Pacific</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>41</VOLUME><PAGES>103-113</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE Papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003930</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Spalding, M. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fox, H. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Allen, G. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Davidson, N.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ferdana, Z. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Finlayson, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Halpern, B. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jorge, M. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lombana, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lourie, S. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Martin, K. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>McManus, E. </AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Molnar, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Recchia, C. A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Robertson, J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal&#xD;and shelf areas</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>BioScience</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>57</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>573-583</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>BioScience</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ecoregions, marine biogeography, mapping, marine protected areas, MPA, representative conservation, Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW), Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs)</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>marine_ecoregions.pdf</NOTES><URL>www.lme.noaa.gov/Portal/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002377</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Staff</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1997</YEAR><TITLE>Managing South Florida&apos;s extensive and delicate coastal environment</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>ArcNews</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>19</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>15</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>ArcNews</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, ESRI, Arc/INFO, ArcView, Marine Resource Information System (FMRIS), decision making</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004183</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Staub, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gn&#xF6;gi, H. R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Morf, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Semantic interoperability through the definition of conceptual model transformations</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>12</VOLUME><NUMBER>2</NUMBER><PAGES>193-208</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003538</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Steel, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lovrich, N.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lach, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Fomenko, V.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>Correlates and consequences of public knowledge concerning ocean fisheries management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>33</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>37-51</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>public knowledge, information sources, policy attitudes, Pacific Ocean fisheries, marine resource management, OCA, Pew Oceans Commission</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Our findings support the assumption made by the authors of the Pew Oceans Commission&#xD;report that increasing public awareness and knowledge of highly technical and complex&#xD;issues such as ocean and coastal ecology will lead to enhanced public support for the&#xD;efforts needed to restore the biological health of the oceans (Pew Oceans Commission,&#xD;2003, 92).&#xD;The principal finding of this study is that knowledge holding, as measured by both&#xD;self-assessed familiarity with key terms and concepts involved in ocean and coastal resource&#xD;management public policy discussions and performance on a &#x201C;quiz&#x201D; testing for&#xD;command of factual information, makes a major difference in the expression of support&#xD;for ocean and coastal resource protection. The impact of knowledge holding is both&#xD;direct and independent of sociodemographic characteristics.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the pdf file - oce_pub_knowl.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003821</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Steel, B. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Ocean and coastal literacy in the United States</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>47</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>45-48</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>K-12, literacy, Pew Oceans Commission, terms, surveys</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The state of the American public&apos;s knowledge on ocean policy issues.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003800</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Stegman, P. M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Foley, D. G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>King, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schwing, F. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Price, H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bograd, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Palacios, D. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Integrating enhanced satellite data maps into coastal management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>87</VOLUME><NUMBER>14</NUMBER><PAGES>137, 142</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>oceanic habitat map, satellites, remote sensing coastal zone management, CZM, oceanic fronts, upwelling, pelagic, biogeography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>destinations for tourists as well as for a large&#xD;population who now reside year-round near&#xD;coasts and whose size is predicted to grow&#xD;steadily. Along with rapid growth in recreational&#xD;and commercial marine activities,&#xD;this increase in coastal development also&#xD;brings issues related to urban runoff, water&#xD;quality, beach access, and marine ecosystem&#xD;health. All of these factors contribute to an&#xD;increase in pressure on the living marine&#xD;biota found in coastal waters. Coastal managers&#xD;are therefore faced with the dual task&#xD;of conserving and protecting marine&#xD;resources as well as allowing for multiple&#xD;uses within nearshore waters.&#xD;A beneficial tool that has yet to be routinely&#xD;integrated in discussions between&#xD;regional planners and various stakeholders&#xD;is a data map depicting representative oceanic&#xD;conditions of coastal and adjacent&#xD;waters. Classifying the state of the pelagic&#xD;realm provides much needed information&#xD;when deliberating such issues as the creation&#xD;of marine reserves.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>satellite_CZM_habitat.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003207</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Stevens, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Rigor and representativeness in marine protected area design</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>237-248</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>conservation, marine protected areas, MPA, sanctuaries, SSE, habitat classification, mapping, representative</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - mpa_design.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002113</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Stewart, I.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vita-Finzi, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1996</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal uplift on active normal faults: The Eliki Fault, Greece</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geophys. Res. Lett.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>23</VOLUME><NUMBER>14</NUMBER><PAGES>1853-1856</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geophysical Research Letters</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>faults</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>2</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003748</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Stockdon, H. F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Predicting the Longshore-variable Coastal Response to Hurricanes</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>College of Oceanic &amp; Atmospheric Sciences</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Corvallis, OR</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Oregon State University</PUBLISHER><TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TERTIARY_AUTHOR>Holman, R. A.</TERTIARY_AUTHOR></TERTIARY_AUTHORS><TYPE_OF_WORK>Doctoral</TYPE_OF_WORK><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>nearshore processes</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>coastal change</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>lidar</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>hurricanes</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>runup</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>setup</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>swash</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Hurricanes</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Barrier islands</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Shorelines</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Coast changes</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Geophysical prediction</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The longshore variability of the coastal response to hurricanes may be examined within the framework of a storm-impact scaling model that compares spatially-variable beach morphology and fluid forcing. The relative elevations of dune height and storm-induced water levels are used to define three impact regimes (swash, collision, and overwash), within which the magnitudes and processes of sediment transport are expected to be unique. Maximum total water-levels are modeled as the sum of astronomical tide, storm surge, and wave runup. The 2% exceedence level for runup, the sum of wave setup and swash, is calculated using a parameterization found to be accurate to 38 cm (rms error) based on comparisons to 491 data runs from ten field experiments. Techniques have been developed to extract accurate (15-cm rms) and detailed measures of large-scale coastal morphology and change from high-resolution topographic laser altimetry (lidar) surveys, allowing for quantification of relevant dune heights as well as the magnitudes and patterns of shoreline, dune, beach slope, and beach volume change in response to hurricanes. Based on the relative elevations of modeled hurricane-induced water levels and lidar-derived measures of pre-storm (1997) dune morphology, the potential impact regimes for Hurricanes Bonnie (1998) and Floyd (1999) were defined at 20-m increments along a 70-km stretch of coast in Onslow Bay, North Carolina. Comparisons to the observed impact regime, quantified from calculations of dune erosion and overwash deposition, indicate that the predictive accuracy of the model was 55.4%, an improvement over the 33.3% accuracy associated with random chance. Regime-specific model sensitivity was highest within the overwash regime (86.9%), decreasing to 55.8% and 1.5% in the collision and swash regimes, respectively. Shoreline and beach volume change in response to the storms were spatially-variable: the standard deviation of change was the same order of magnitude as the mean. Magnitudes of coastal change scaled with the observed impact regime. Beach volume change within the overwash and collision regimes was over two times greater than that within the swash regime. Little recovery was observed in overwashed locations where sand was transported inland and removed from the nearshore system. Here, the volume of sand removed from the beach was balanced by that in the overwash deposits.</ABSTRACT><URL>http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/dspace/handle/1957/1930</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003812</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Strain, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rajabifard, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Williamson, I.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Marine administration and spatial data infrastructure</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Pol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>30</VOLUME><PAGES>431-441</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Policy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Marine environment; Spatial data infrastructures; Marine cadastre, MIDA, CMRC, coastal atlas, OCA</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper reviews the emergence of the spatial dimension of marine and coastal zone administration, and examines several&#xD;initiatives around the world that contribute to this idea. Spatial data have been recognised as an important resource to improve&#xD;decision-making and resource management in both the land and marine environments in terms of sustainable development. Many&#xD;countries are developing Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) to improve access and sharing of spatial data, however, most of these&#xD;initiatives stop at the coastline. Recently, global and regional activities such as the 3rd United Nations Convention on the Law of the&#xD;Sea (UNCLOS) and the Sustainable Development Strategy for the Seas of East Asia (SDS-SEA) have brought to international&#xD;attention the importance of effective administration of the marine and coastal environments.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Strain2006MarinePolicy.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001369</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>UNOLS Coastal Oceanography Subcommittee</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal oceanography: Trends, vessel requirements</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Sea Technology</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Sea Technology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>35</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>21-29</PAGES><ABSTRACT>Operations more complex, more intense than &quot;blue water&quot; spell need for small, high capability vessels; in U.S., regional differences</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003178</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sui, D. Z.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2001</YEAR><TITLE><styles><style face='2' start='10'></style><style start='57'></style></styles>Review of Multidimensional Geographic Information Science by Jonathan Raper</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Annals AAG</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>91</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>779-780</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Annals of the Association of American Geographers</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal management, geographic information science, GISci, representation of space and time</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;my Annals paper referenced!</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004345</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Sui, D. Z.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie&#x2019;s new tattoo and the future of GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Env. Urban Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>32</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>1-5</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>editorial</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers, Environment and Urban Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>neogeography, map sharing, VGI, volunteered geographic information, Web 2.0, privacy, GIS, GIScience, geographic information science</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>For better or worse, recent development and applications&#xD;of geospatial technologies have often been linked to&#xD;Hollywood celebrities. Regardless of the legal merits, Barbara&#xD;Streisand&#x2019;s lawsuit against the director of the California&#xD;Coastal Records project (www.californiacoastline.org)&#xD;has helped raise the awareness among the general public&#xD;about the potential invasion of individual privacies due&#xD;to the increasing use of high resolution remote sensing&#xD;imageries and aerial photographs (Sui, 2006). Recent&#xD;stories involving another Hollywood celebrity &#x2013; Angelina&#xD;Jolie &#x2013; signal a new episode in the development of GIS,&#xD;which I believe deserves more serious attention by all of&#xD;us in the geospatial community.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>wikification_GIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003265</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Suman, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Shivlani, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Milon, J. W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>Perceptions and attitudes regarding marine reserves: A comparison of stakeholder groups in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>1019-1040</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef conservation, sanctuaries, SSE, marine reserves, MPAs, marine protected areas, zoning, harvest refugia, public outreach, information dissemination</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Pile of papers under Snoopy paperweight</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003353</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Summerhayes, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Technical tools for regional seas management: The role of the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS)</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>777-796</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean regions, regionalization, regional seas, a regional seas dossier</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS) is a system of organization providing a&#xD;framework for the ocean observing activities of the world and the organizations, programmes&#xD;and projects that support them. GOOS is a tool designed to provide information required to&#xD;meet the needs of a wide user community. It may be used to increase the effectiveness of the&#xD;regional seas programme in meeting its targets, and to help regional fisheries bodies to&#xD;implement an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management. GOOS will be implemented&#xD;by national agencies operating individually or with others through regional agreements of&#xD;various kinds. Several nations with common interests in particular seas have already combined&#xD;their efforts into regional GOOS bodies. To a large extent these map onto the UNEP regional&#xD;sea areas, to which they are complementary. GOOS implementation began in 1998, and efforts&#xD;are underway to make it useful to UNEP&#x2019;s regional seas programme.</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - GOOS.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002587</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Suter, J. R. </AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mossa, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Penland, S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1989</YEAR><TITLE>Preliminary assessments of the occurrence and effects of utilization of sand and aggregate resources of the Louisiana inner shelf</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geol.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>90</VOLUME><PAGES>31-37</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geology</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>shoreline erosion, coastal and marine geography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder &quot;Mossa&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002353</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Working Group on Sea Level Rise and Wetland Systems</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1997</YEAR><TITLE>Conserving coastal wetlands despite sea level rise</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Eos, Trans. AGU</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>78</VOLUME><NUMBER>25</NUMBER><PAGES>257, 260-261</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union</ALTERNATE_TITLE><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004308</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Takken, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Data sharing from mash-up to SDI</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GEOInformatics</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>5</NUMBER><PAGES>54-55</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GEOInformatics</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>mashup defined, spatial data infrastructure, SDI, NSDI, Google Earth, INSPIRE, GML, OGC</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Is there a clear winner between Google Earth mashups and formal SDIs? The consensus for now seems to be that they are complementary. &quot;And when it comes to public sector data, this will only ever be meade available viat the official SDISs, since only the public sector (in the foreseeable future) will have access to their data.&quot;</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal in hardcopy and a special pdf (i.e., all articles in same pdf, but with no cutting and pasting allowed)</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004398</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Thompson, M. H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Dumont, C. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Gaymer, C. F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>ISO 14001: Towards international quality environmental management standards for marine protected areas</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><PAGES>727-739</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>spatial data infrastructures, SDI, data sharing, marine protected areas, marine reserve, standards</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper addresses the current lack of internationally recognized standards for quality management&#xD;practices in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The application of the ISO 14001 standard for environmental&#xD;management systems to MPAs can provide a flexible and adaptive management system that can be&#xD;integrated with existing MPA management practices as a standardized quality management process&#xD;designed for the continuous improvement of MPA management. The paper provides a framework for&#xD;applying ISO 14001 to MPAs and discusses the results of a practical case study in northern Chile wherein&#xD;ISO 14001 was used as a benchmark for evaluating and improving the proposed management plan for&#xD;a Chilean marine reserve.&#xD;This paper attempts to address the current lack of internationally&#xD;recognized standards for quality management practices for&#xD;MPAs. It is proposed that because the International Organization for&#xD;Standardization (ISO) is a global leader in both quality (ISO 9000)&#xD;and environmental (ISO 14000) management standards, the&#xD;application of the ISO 14001 standard for environmental management systems to MPAs can provide a flexible and adaptive&#xD;management system which can be integrated with existing practices&#xD;as a standardized quality management process designed for&#xD;the continuous improvement of MPA management. To build a case&#xD;for ISO 14001 to be used as a global standard for MPA management,&#xD;the following examines the adoption of ISO as a global standard, the&#xD;international collaborative effort that was undertaken to develop&#xD;the ISO 14001 standard, and its wide range of applications;&#xD;including an in-depth examination of the standard&#x2019;s application to&#xD;terrestrial protected areas management. Subsequently, a theoretical&#xD;framework is provided for applying ISO 14001 to MPA&#xD;management by comparing it to and integrating it with existing&#xD;MPA management guidelines. Finally, the results of a practical case&#xD;study are presented wherein ISO 14001 was used as a benchmark&#xD;for evaluating and improving the proposed management plan for&#xD;a newly created Chilean marine reserve.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>MPA_ISO.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003247</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Thumerer, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jones, A. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Brown, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>A GIS based coastal management system for climate change associated with flood risk assessment on the east coast of England</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>14</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>265-281</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, change detection, coastal GIS, erosion, shoreline mapping, sea level rise, decision support system, Oregon Coastal Atlas (OCA), MRM</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Pile of papers under Snoopy paperweight</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004292</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tikunov, V. S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ormeling, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Konecny, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Atlas information systems and geographical names information systems as contributants to spatial data infrastructure</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Digital Earth</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>279-290</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Digital Earth</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>web GIS? web atlas, coastal web atlas, CWA, atlas; information system; geographical names; SDI implementation; ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Abstract&#xD;National and international programs dealing with spatial data infrastructures (SDI) made it possible to compile a uniform digital base and a universal toolkit for the integrated description of territories on global to national scales. Atlas information systems (AIS) are considered to be an integrating tool for diverse information resources (modelling, visualisation and analysis), as well as for the elaboration of various scenarios and the possible development of alternatives for such complex systems as those of nature-society-economy. As there is an increased use of digital maps at spatial data infrastructures all aspects related to geographical names are of particular importance in this application of AIS to SDI. It is important to realise a toponymic project, dealing with place-names and their variants depending on the language and time period when a specific place-name was used. The layer of geographical names is considered to be one of the three most important data components of AIS.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>AIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004203</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tolvanen, H.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kalliola, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>A structured approach to geographical information in coastal research and management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>485-494</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal GIS, ICAN, web atlases, GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>In coastal areas different views, strategies, policies, practices and technologies about digital spatial data&#xD;need to be viewed comprehensively. We propose a structured approach to enhance the use of geographical&#xD;information in coastal applications in three different levels. The building of a Coastal Geographic&#xD;Information System involves a clear determination of the specific information needs and user&#xD;groups that correspond to the coastal area in question, and furthermore their evaluation prior to the&#xD;actual implementation of the system. Second, primary coastal data can be effectively converted into&#xD;coastal knowledge through enhanced conceptualisation, data combinations and spatial modelling,&#xD;gaining better spatial data contents to facilitate research, administration and management. Third, Coastal&#xD;Spatial Data Infrastructures should be promoted to facilitate inter-institutional collaboration and&#xD;information sharing. The structured approach is presented using the case of the southwest Finnish archipelago&#xD;coast as an example area.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>structured_GI_CZM.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004103</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tomai, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Prastacos, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kovouras, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>A framework for intensional and extensional integration of geographic ontologies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>873-888</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SDI, coastal atlas, Oregon coastal atlas, OCA, CMRC, NSDI, ontology, ontologies, integrating ontologies, population density, thematic maps</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003831</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tran, K. C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Public perception of development issues: Public awareness can contribute to sustainable development of a small island</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>49</VOLUME><PAGES>367-383</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>public knowledge, information sources, policy attitudes, public perception, coastal GIS, coastal communities, Mexico</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Many development projects are undertaken in communities where the local inhabitants have little&#xD;or no input to the planning and implementation of such projects. Encouraging the active&#xD;participation of local communities in development projects, through capacity-building and&#xD;environmental education, has become a major objective of sound development programmes. We&#xD;have successfully included the local community of Holbox Island, Quintana Roo State, Mexico in&#xD;our programme for long-term monitoring of coastal pollution in and around their Island. Here we&#xD;report the progress made by different sectors of the Holbox community over a four-year period&#xD;during which they have become increasingly responsible for the scientific and technical aspects of&#xD;assessing water quality. A face-to-face, structured survey was used to evaluate attitudes and&#xD;perceptions with regard to coastal water pollution and other development issues that concern the&#xD;Holbox Island community. People in Holbox identified coastal pollution, coastal erosion and&#xD;garbage dumping as major environmental concerns and have acquired a good level of awareness&#xD;about the causes and consequences of these issues. Our results also indicate that the public has an&#xD;improved understanding of the interrelationship between their own behaviour, and that of others,&#xD;and these environmental issues. Our contribution in the Holbox Island has made a positive step&#xD;towards providing the local community with essential knowledge regarding environmental,&#xD;development and social issues, thereby enabling them to become actively involved in the&#xD;environmental conservation of their island. Continuing efforts in capacity-building and environmental&#xD;education aim to provide the local community with the knowledge and skills that are&#xD;necessary for making appropriate choices for the preservation and development of Holbox and the&#xD;surrounding ecosystems. In the long term, the local community will not only be able to contribute directly to on-going development projects, but will also be in a better position to participate with&#xD;government agencies in the decision-making process.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>public_perception_island.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004258</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tripathi, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Babaie, H. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Developing a modular hydrogeology ontology by extending the SWEET upper-level ontologies</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>34</VOLUME><PAGES>1022-1033</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers &amp; Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network, ontologies, super ontology, upper level ontology, SWEET for hydrogeology</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Upper-level ontologies comprise general concepts and properties which need to be&#xD;extended to include more diverse and specific domain vocabularies. We present the&#xD;extension of NASA&#x2019;s Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET)&#xD;ontologies to include part of the hydrogeology domain. We describe a methodology that&#xD;can be followed by other allied domain experts who intend to adopt the SWEET ontologies&#xD;in their own discipline. We have maintained the modular design of the SWEET ontologies&#xD;for maximum extensibility and reusability of our ontology in other fields, to ensure interdisciplinary&#xD;knowledge reuse, management, and discovery.&#xD;The extension of the SWEET ontologies involved identification of the general SWEET&#xD;concepts (classes) to serve as the super-class of the domain concepts. This was followed&#xD;by establishing the special inter-relationships between domain concepts (e.g., equivalence&#xD;for vadose zone and unsaturated zone), and identifying the dependent concepts such as&#xD;physical properties and units, and their relationship to external concepts. Ontology&#xD;editing tools such as SWOOP and Prote&#xB4;ge&#xB4; were used to analyze and visualize the structure&#xD;of the existing OWL files. Domain concepts were introduced either as standalone new&#xD;classes or as subclasses of existing SWEET ontologies. This involved changing the&#xD;relationships (properties) and/or adding new relationships based on domain theories. In&#xD;places, in the Owl files, the entire structure of the existing concepts needed to be changed&#xD;to represent the domain concept more meaningfully. Throughout this process, the&#xD;orthogonal structure of SWEET ontologies was maintained and the consistency of the&#xD;concepts was tested using the Racer reasoner. Individuals were added to the new concepts&#xD;to test the modified ontologies. Our work shows that SWEET ontologies can successfully&#xD;be extended and reused in any field without losing their modular or reference structure,&#xD;or disrupting their URI links.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>SWEET_ext.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003203</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tripathi, N. K.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Rao, A. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>Bathymetric mapping in Kakinada Bay, India, using IRS-1D LISS-III data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Remote Sensing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>23</VOLUME><NUMBER>6</NUMBER><PAGES>1013-1025</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Remote Sensing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>spectral reflectance, Indian Remote Sensing satellite LISS, turbidity influence, bathymetry, coastal management, multi-spectral scanner</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - india_bathy.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002900</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tsaymenyi, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>The institutional framework for regional cooperation in ocean and coastal managment in the South Pacific</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>465-481</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE Papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002718</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Turner, A. K.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1998</YEAR><TITLE>New NOAA datasets describe U.S. coastal zones</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>GeoWorld</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>11</NUMBER><PAGES>34</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>GeoWorld</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>oceanography and GIS, beach mapping with airborne lasers, hurricane observations from satellites</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003347</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Tutangata, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Power, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>The regional scale of ocean governance regional cooperation in the Pacific Islands</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>873-884</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>American Samoa</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The Pacific Islands community is committed to protecting the quality of life of its people&#xD;and the integrity of the environment with which island life is inextricably intertwined. It&#xD;would, however, be impossible for Pacific Island Countries to cope individually with the&#xD;common regional issues and the increased impact of global climate and economic problems.&#xD;The support of the various regional organisations, strengthened further by inter-agency&#xD;collaboration under the Council of Regional Organisations of the Pacific is critical to success.&#xD;Use of a regional approach to develop strategic responses to issues has many advantages:&#xD;sharing of high investment or establishment costs for capital intensive activities; augmenting&#xD;capacity or capability constraints that arise in small populations, economies of scale in the&#xD;provision of centralised training services; better formulation of policies or activities that have&#xD;transboundary &#x2018;&#x2018;spill-over&#x2019;&#x2019; or &#x2018;&#x2018;mutually reinforcing&#x2019;&#x2019; impacts; and most critically&#x2014;a stronger&#xD;voice in global fora.</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - pac_isle_govern.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003841</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>UCa, Z. D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Sunar Erbek, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Kusak, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yasa, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Oezden, G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>The use of optic and radar satellite data for coastal environments</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Remote Sensing</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>27</VOLUME><NUMBER>17</NUMBER><PAGES>3739-??</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Remote Sensing</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Coast changes, coastal geomorphology, coastal remote sensing, OCA, Oregon Coastal Atlas,</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>no pdf at this time, but should in Valley Lib e-holdings</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002973</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Urbanski, J. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>The use of fuzzy sets in the evaluation of the environment of coastal waters</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>13</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>723-730</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coastal GIS, oceanography and GIS, teaching, GEO 580</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Cardboard bin, &quot;Reprints c. 1999&quot;</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003251</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Vallega, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>Introduction: Coastal education -- a multifaceted challenge</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>43</VOLUME><PAGES>277-290</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>education, network learning, oceanography, teaching, MRM</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Pile of papers under Snoopy paperweight</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003348</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Vallega, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>The regional approach to the ocean, the ocean regions, and ocean regionalisation -- a post-modern dilemma</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>721-760</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>regionalization</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Essentially, this paper aims at considering how the ocean regionalisation may be&#xD;implemented focusing on the principle of sustainable development, on the subsequent criteria&#xD;designed by the inter-governmental organisation framework, and on the approaches from the&#xD;scientific literature. In this respect, a model is proposed, according to which two main stages&#xD;are identified: (i) the stage of the modern approach to the ocean, which was operated by the&#xD;modern society and was supported by the culture of modernity; (ii) the stage of the postmodern&#xD;approach, which has been triggered by the converging inputs from the changes in&#xD;society andnature. The watershedbetween these two stages may be locatedin the 1970s. The&#xD;investigation may be carriedout considering a triangular relationship between (i) the changing&#xD;ocean reality (ontological dimension), (ii) the representation of this reality (semiological&#xD;dimension), and (iii) the building up of signified, consisting in theories, meta-theories and&#xD;values (epistemological and ethical dimensions). In this framework, special relevance is&#xD;attributedto the interaction between science and policy.&#xD;Moving from this basis, how ocean regionalisation hadbeen conceivedby oceanography,&#xD;geography andlaw is consideredfocusing on the implications that have arisen in terms of&#xD;ocean management. Analysis is essentially focusedon three questions: (i) how much the&#xD;conceptual implications of the approach to the ocean regional scale have been underestimated,&#xD;andhow ample the political consequences have been; (ii) why the political designs referring to&#xD;this spatial scale of the ocean, which have been carrying out since the 1970s, have been marked&#xD;by a lack of consistency of the legal framework with the prospect of operating sustainable&#xD;management programmes; (iii) whether, and what kind of, discrepancy has solidified between&#xD;the legal framework, provided by the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS),</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - ocean_regions.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003351</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Vallega, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2002</YEAR><TITLE>The regional seas in the 21st century: An overview</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>45</VOLUME><PAGES>925-934</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ocean regions, regionalization, regional seas, a regional seas dossier</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper is meant as introducing A Regional Seas Dossier on the regional seas by&#xD;sketching some cardinal considerations that maybe deduced from the data, maps and&#xD;diagrams, which the Dossier consists in. First, a stage-based view of the spatial diffusion&#xD;process triggered bythe ocean management programmes on the regional scale is provided.&#xD;Shifting from this basis, an essential view of the geographical coverage of the regional&#xD;programmes is designed, in so paving the wayto consider the human pressure, which the&#xD;individual regional seas are subject to. Finally, some crucial issues are presented, including the&#xD;need (i) to integrated the management of the national and international waters covered bythe&#xD;individual programme, (ii) to optimise the institutional arrangements which the individual&#xD;programme is based on, (iii) to co-ordinate the regional programmes, particularlywhere there&#xD;overlap an individual sea; and (iv) to use the individual sea programmes or action plans to&#xD;co-ordinate coastal management on the regional scale.</ABSTRACT><URL>I have the pdf file - regional_seas.pdf</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003729</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Van de Vlag, D.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Vasseur, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Stein, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Jeansoulin, R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2005</YEAR><TITLE>An application of problem and product ontologies for the revision of beach nourishments</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>19</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>1057-1072</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>problem ontology, product ontology, quality issues, fitness for use, accuracy assessment, coastal movement, object determination</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004088</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Van Kouwen, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Dieperink, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Schot, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wassen, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Applicability of decision support systems for integrated coastal zone management</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>36</VOLUME><PAGES>19-34</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>decision support systems, integrated coastal zone management, knowledge</KEYWORD><KEYWORD>utilization, policy support, stakeholder participation, tools, NOAA SARP</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The use of Decision Support Systems (DSSs) in Integrated Coastal Zone Management&#xD;(ICZM) has declined since the 1990s. In this article we investigate the opportunities&#xD;for enhancing the applicability of ICZM-DSSs by considering the following research&#xD;questions: (1) &#x201C;What DSS functionalities are important for ICZM decision-making?&#x201D;&#xD;and (2) &#x201C;which of these functionalities are part of present-day ICZM-DSS tools?&#x201D; The&#xD;first question has been answered by a literature survey. We identified knowledge- and&#xD;process-related ICZM challenges and DSS functionalities that may help in meeting these&#xD;challenges. For the second question, a selection of ICZM-DSS tools has been evaluated.&#xD;The study shows none of the tools have all of the identified functionalities. The tools&#xD;support either problem structuring/exploration or impact assessment while none of the&#xD;tools manages to combine these functions. The implications for both DSS users (coastal&#xD;managers) and DSS developers are discussed.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>CZM_DSS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004386</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Waddell, J. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Clarke, A. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2008. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 73.</TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Silver Spring, MD</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>NOAA/NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment&#x2019;s Biogeography Team</PUBLISHER><PAGES>569</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coral reef, Coral Reef Ecosystem Data-Gathering Activities and Resource Condition </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Water Quality and Oceanographic Conditions </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Benthic Habitats </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Associated Biological Communities </KEYWORD><KEYWORD>Current Conservation Management Activities</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This report is the third in an ongoing series of assessments of the condition of coral reef ecosystems in the United States and Pacific Freely Associated states, and the second report to focus specifically on summarizing the results of coral reef ecosystem monitoring activities carried out by federal, state, territorial, commonwealth, private, academic, and non-governmental partners (Figure A). The chapter authors, who are scientists and managers directly involved in local efforts to conserve and monitor coral reef ecosystems, present data describing the status of water quality, benthic habitats, and the coral reef-associated biological communities and evaluate the impacts of thirteen major threats to coral reefs identified in the National Coral Reef Action Strategy (NOAA, 2002). The authors then briefly summarize the current conservation management activities being implemented in the 15 jurisdictions and provide conclusions and recommendations for future action. This edition of the report also contains a chapter describing some of the many National Level Activities that contribute&#xD;to coral reef conservation and a National&#xD;Summary chapter that is based on a questionnaire completed by the local report coordinators and/or writing team members.&#xD;&#xD;Much of the work presented in this document&#xD;has been funded by NOAA&#x2019;s Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP). More information about CRCP activities is available&#xD;at http://www.coralreef.noaa.gov/. CRCP support complements funding from many of the other federal, state, territorial,&#xD;commonwealth, and non-governmental partners who participated in this effort. Thus this report has been made possible through the collective efforts of many organizations.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Samoa_Latest--&gt; State_of_Corals_Report2008.pdf and Am_Samoa_Corals_NOAA.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/ecosystems/coralreef/coral2008/landing.html &#xD;http://www.coralreef.noaa.gov&#xD;http://www.coris.noaa.gov</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004336</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Waldrop, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Wikiomics</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Nature</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>455</VOLUME><PAGES>22-25</PAGES><DATE>September 4, 2008</DATE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Nature</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, content management, data management</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Pioneering biologists are trying to use wiki-type web pages to manage and interpret data, reports. But will the wider research community go along with the experiment?&#xD;Alexander Pico remembers&#xD;just when the idea&#xD;hit him. In January&#xD;2007, he and his boss,&#xD;Bruce Conklin, were discussing how to push&#xD;their software tool for visualizing intracellular&#xD;signalling pathways to the next level of interactivity&#xD;&#x2014; when Pico blurted out, &#x201C;What we&#xD;really need is a wiki!&#x201D;</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Big_Data ---&gt;big_data_wikiomics.pdf</NOTES><URL>http://www.nature.com/news/specials/bigdata/index.html</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003305</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wang, Y.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bonynge, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Nugranad, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Traber, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Ngusaru, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tobey, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hale, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bowen, R.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Makota, V.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Remote sensing of mangrove change along the Tanzania coast</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>35-48</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS, LIDAR, satellite image, classification, coastal mapping</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - mangroves.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004285</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Weible, C. M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Caught in a maelstrom: Implementing California marine protected areas</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>36</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>350-373</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>coalitions; implementation; Marine Life Protection Act; marine protected areas; marine reserves, marine sanctuaries, coral reefs, larval dispersal, SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>The first attempt to implement the 1999 California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) to establish marine protected areas (MPAs) ended contentiously in 2002. The initial MLPA process is examined by a statutory analysis and an analysis of stakeholder network relationships and beliefs. The failure of the initial MLPA process can be understood by a combination of factors: (i) Insufficient financial support from the California State government; (ii) Unclear, unranked and inconsistent statutory objectives; (iii) The application of a science-based process that excluded affected stakeholders; (iv) Implementing officials who lacked expertise in designing and managing political processes; and (v) A community of stakeholders who were polarized into coalitions of proponents and opponents of MPAs. The article concludes by discussing limitations of its methods and analysis and by offering strategies for learning from policy failures.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>implementing_CA_MPA.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000000743</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>West, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1989</YEAR><TITLE>Coastal and marine geography</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Gaile, G. L.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Willmott, C. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geography in America</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Columbus, Ohio</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Merrill Publishing Company</PUBLISHER><PAGES>141-154</PAGES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004006</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wiegand, N.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Garcia, C.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2007</YEAR><TITLE>A task-based ontology approach to automatic geospatial data retrieval</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Trans. GIS</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>11</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>355-376</PAGES><TYPE_OF_WORK>Special issue</TYPE_OF_WORK><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Transactions in GIS</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ABSTRACT>This paper presents a task-based and Semantic Web approach to find geospatial data.&#xD;The purpose of the project is to improve data discovery and facilitate automatic&#xD;retrieval of data sources. The work presented here helps create the beginnings of a&#xD;Geospatial Semantic Web. The intent is to create a system that provides appropriate&#xD;results to application users who search for data when facing tasks such as emergency&#xD;response or planning activities. In our task-based system, we formalize the relationships&#xD;between types of tasks, including emergency response, and types of data sources&#xD;needed for those tasks. Domain knowledge, including criteria describing data sources,&#xD;is recorded in an ontology language. With the ontology, reasoning can be done to&#xD;infer various types of information including which data sources meet specific criteria&#xD;for use in particular tasks. The vision presented here is that in an emergency, for&#xD;example, a user accesses a Web-based application and selects the type of emergency&#xD;and the geographic area. The application then returns the types and locations (URLs)&#xD;of the specific geospatial data needed. We explore the abilities and limitations of the&#xD;OWL Web Ontology Language along with other Semantic Web technologies for this&#xD;purpose.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original journal&#xD;Geospatial_Semantic --&gt; task-based.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003307</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wilber, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Iocco, L. A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Using a GIS to examine changes in the bathymetry of Borrow Pits and in Lower Bay, New York Harbor, USA</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>49-61</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS, sedimentation, bathymetry, dredging, borrow pits, New York harbor</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - NYharbor_bathy.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001834</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wilson, J. D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Should the government get out of the mapping business?</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Earth Observation Magazine</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Earth Observation Magazine</ALTERNATE_TITLE><VOLUME>4</VOLUME><NUMBER>7</NUMBER><PAGES>18-21</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SDTS, NGDC, NSDI, data management, data copyright</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Mappers square off in the debate over government dominance of the geospatial data infrastructure</ABSTRACT><NOTES>Blue folder, geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003466</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wilson, N.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>The beginnings of a logical semantics framework for the integration of thematic map data</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>18</VOLUME><NUMBER>4</NUMBER><PAGES>389-416</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Science</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>data fusion</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the original journal</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003426</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wood, N. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Good, J. W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2004</YEAR><TITLE>Vulnerability of port and harbor communities to Earthquake and tsunami hazards: The Use of GIS in community hazard planning</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Coastal Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>32</VOLUME><PAGES>243-269</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>earthquake, Cascadia, GIS, hazards, Pacific Northwest, ports, tsunami, coastal hazard GIS, OCA</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>I have the pdf file - coastal_hazard_GIS.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004352</REFNUM><AUTHORS><styles><style face='1'></style></styles><AUTHOR>Wright, A.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Searching the deep web</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comm. ACM</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>51</VOLUME><NUMBER>10</NUMBER><PAGES>14-15</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Communications of the ACM, Association of Computing Machinery</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Semantic Web, deep web, semantic crawlers, DataNet, deep web services, SOA, cyberinfrastructure, semantic deep web</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>While the Semantic Web may be a long time coming,&#xD;Deep Web search strategies offer the promise of a semantic Web.&#xD;&#xD;he Web is bigger than it&#xD;looks. Beyond the billions&#xD;of pages that populate the&#xD;major search engines lies an&#xD;even vaster, hidden Web of&#xD;data: classified ads, library catalogs, airline&#xD;reservation systems, phone books,&#xD;scientific databases, and all kinds of&#xD;other information that remains largely&#xD;concealed from view behind a curtain&#xD;of query forms. Some estimates have&#xD;pegged the size of the Deep Web at up to&#xD;500 times larger than the Surface Web&#xD;(also known as the Shallow Web) of static&#xD;HTML pages.&#xD;Researchers have been trying to crack&#xD;the Deep Web for years, but most of those&#xD;efforts to date have focused on building&#xD;specialized vertical applications like&#xD;comparison shopping portals, business&#xD;intelligence tools, or top-secret national&#xD;security projects that scour hard-to-crawl&#xD;overseas data sources. These projects&#xD;have succeeded largely by targeting narrow&#xD;domains where a search application&#xD;can be fine-tuned to query a relatively&#xD;small number of databases and return&#xD;highly targeted results.&#xD;Bringing Deep Web search techniques&#xD;to bear on the public Web poses&#xD;a more difficult challenge. While a few&#xD;high-profile sites like Amazon or You-&#xD;Tube provide public Web services or&#xD;custom application programming interfaces&#xD;that open their databases to&#xD;search engines, many more sites do not.&#xD;Multiply that problem by the millions of&#xD;possible data sources now connected to&#xD;the Web&#x2014;all with different form-handling&#xD;rules, languages, encodings, and&#xD;an almost infinite array of possible results&#x2014;&#xD;and you&#x2019;re have one tough assignment.&#xD;&#x201C;This is the most interesting data&#xD;integration problem imaginable,&#x201D; says&#xD;Alon Halevy, a former University of Washington&#xD;computer science professor who&#xD;is now leading a Google team trying to&#xD;solve the Deep Web search conundrum.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>searching_deep_web.pdf &#xD;see also Geller, 2008</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002766</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wright, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Bartlett, D. J.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2000</YEAR><TITLE>Marine and Coastal Geographical Information Systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Fisher, P.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Raper, J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Research Monographs in Geographical Information Systems</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>London</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Taylor &amp; Francis</PUBLISHER><PAGES>320</PAGES><CALL_NUMBER>GC10.4.R4 M37 2000</CALL_NUMBER><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>2nd printing</NOTES><URL>http://dusk.geo.orst.edu/book/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003309</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wright, D. J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>O&apos;Dea, E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cushing, J. B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Cuny, J. E.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Toomey, D. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2003</YEAR><TITLE>Why web GIS may not be enough: A case study with the Virtual Research Vessel</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Mar. Geod.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>26</VOLUME><NUMBER>1-2</NUMBER><PAGES>73-86</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Marine Geodesy</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>GIS and oceanography, special issue on marine and coastal GIS, web GIS, computational environment, mapping and exploration, seafloor-spreading, midocean ridges, interdisciplinary science</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><URL>dusk.geo.orst.edu/vrv</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004196</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Wu, S.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yang, L. T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Li Xu, T.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Lecture Notes in Computer Science  5036, Third International Conference, GPC 2008, Kunming, China, May 25-28, 2008, Proceedings</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Berlin/Heidelberg</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Springer</PUBLISHER><VOLUME>5036</VOLUME><PAGES>10.1007/978-3-540-68083-3</PAGES><ISBN>978-3-540-68081-9</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, cyberinfrastructure</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>&#xD;Grid computing presents a new trend in distributed computing for coordinating&#xD;large-scale heterogeneous resource sharing and problem solving in dynamic,&#xD;multi-institutional virtual organizations. Grid computing not only can be used&#xD;for distributed supercomputing massive data processing, but can also be a common&#xD;platform and way for utility and service computing. It covers mainframes&#xD;or supercomputers as well as more powerful personal computers and even small&#xD;and smart devices, ranging from personal digital assistants to unseen chips in&#xD;our cars, appliances and telephones. Projecting this trend into the future, we&#xD;envision an explosion of interconnected high-performance computers and smart&#xD;devices that can make our research and daily lives easier and more productive.&#xD;Grid and Pervasive Computing (GPC) is an annual international conference on&#xD;the emerging areas of merging grid computing and pervasive computing. GPC&#xD;provides a high-profile, leading-edge forum for researchers and engineers alike&#xD;to present their latest research in the field of grid computing and pervasive&#xD;computing.&#xD;This year there were 184 paper submissions from all across the world. All the&#xD;papers were reviewed by at least two referees from the conference&#x2019;s Technical&#xD;Program Committee or by external reviewers. In order to allocate as many papers&#xD;as possible and keep the high quality of the conference, we finally decided&#xD;to accept 45 papers, representing an acceptance rate of 24%. We believe that all&#xD;of these papers and topics not only provided novel ideas, new results, work in&#xD;progress and state-of-the-art techniques in this field, but also stimulated future&#xD;research activities in the area of grid and pervasive computing. This conference&#xD;was a result of the hard work of very many people such as external reviewers,&#xD;Program and Technical Committee members. We would like to express our&#xD;sincere thanks to everyone involved. Ultimately, however, the success of the conference&#xD;will be judged by how well the delegates participated, learnt, interacted&#xD;and established contacts with other researchers. The committees provided the&#xD;venue and created the environment to allow these objectives to be achieved,&#xD;ensuring that the conference was an outstanding success.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>PDF_Journal_articles --&gt; Grid_Pervasive_Computing_eBook&#xD;Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Grid and&#xD;Pervasive Computing (GPC 2008) which was held in Kunming, Yunnan, China, May 25&#x2013;28, 2008.</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004293</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Yang, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Li, W.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Xie, J.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zhou, B.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Distributed geospatial information processing: sharing distributed geospatial resources to support Digital Earth</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Digital Earth</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>1</VOLUME><NUMBER>3</NUMBER><PAGES>259-278</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Digital Earth</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Digital Earth; DGIP; interoperability; cyberinfrastructure; ontology; semantic search; ICAN, International Coastal Atlas Network, prototype, CWA, coastal web atlas?</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>This paper introduces a new concept, distributed geospatial information processing (DGIP), which refers to the process of geospatial information residing on computers geographically dispersed and connected through computer networks, and the contribution of DGIP to Digital Earth (DE). The DGIP plays a critical role in integrating the widely distributed geospatial resources to support the DE envisioned to utilise a wide variety of information. This paper addresses this role from three different aspects: 1) sharing Earth data, information, and services through geospatial interoperability supported by standardisation of contents and interfaces; 2) sharing computing and software resources through a GeoCyberinfrastructure supported by DGIP middleware; and 3) sharing knowledge within and across domains through ontology and semantic searches. Observing the long-term process for the research and development of an operational DE, we discuss and expect some practical contributions of the DGIP to the DE.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>dgip-ijde folder</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002178</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Yazici, A.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Buckles, B. P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Petry, F. E.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>A semantic data model approach to knowledge-intensive applications</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Expert Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>8</VOLUME><NUMBER>1</NUMBER><PAGES>77-91</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Expert Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>databases, data models, data manipulation languages, visual languages, expressive power</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Green folder, general geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001736</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Yuan, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1995</YEAR><TITLE>Structuring and representing spatial and temporal information in geographic information systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>SSD &apos;95 Proceedings</SECONDARY_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>data model, GIS, knowledge acquistion, semantics</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder, geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001735</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Yuan, M.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>submitted</YEAR><TITLE>Use of knowledge acquisition to build wildfire representation in geographic information systems</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Int. J. Geographical Info. Sys.</SECONDARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>International Journal of Geographical Information Systems</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>data model, GIS, knowledge acquistion, semantics</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder, geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>1</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004163</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Yuan, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Hornsby, K. S.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Computation and Visualization for Understanding Dynamics in Geographic Domains: A Research Agenda</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>UCGIS</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Boca Raton, Florida</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>CRC Press</PUBLISHER><PAGES>112</PAGES><ISBN>1-4200-6032-5</ISBN><LABEL>UCGIS research agenda</LABEL><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>UCGIS workshop, geovisualization, visualization, visual analytics, spatiotemporal analysis and modeling; spatiotemporal visual analytics; spatiotemporal data mining; spatiotemporal reasoning; and spatiotemporal ontologies.</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Building upon the success of the workshop on Geospatial Data Mining and Visualization held in 2003, the University Consortium for Geographic Information Science (UCGIS) is hosting this workshop to bring together leading researchers from multiple disciplines to discuss next-generation computation and visualization models needed for the understanding of dynamics in geographic domains. The workshop is sponsored by geospatial intelligence communities.&#xD;Participants will be selected from UCGIS member institutions to join representatives from an array of government agencies to discuss visions, challenges, and research needs in the topical area. In addition to plenary sessions, breakout-group meetings, and open-space discussions, the workshop will invite representatives from the intelligence community to demonstrate current uses of spatiotemporal information technologies and elaborate on needs for further developments.&#xD;The workshop is expected to deliver two books: one on the research and development agenda and another to address broader issues and research challenges on the topical area. Possible topics for consideration at the workshop include (but are not limited to): spatiotemporal analysis and modeling; spatiotemporal visual analytics; spatiotemporal data mining; spatiotemporal reasoning; and spatiotemporal ontologies.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>I have the original book</NOTES><URL>http://www.ucgis.org/dynamics_workshop/</URL></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000001734</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Yuan, M. </AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Mark, D.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1994</YEAR><TITLE>Eliciting experts&apos; knowledge as a foundation for wildfire data modeling in GIS</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Proceedings of the 14th Annual ESRI User Conference</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Palm Springs, CA</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>ESRI</PUBLISHER><PAGES>1179-1191</PAGES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>data model, GIS, knowledge acquistion, semantics</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Manilla folder, geography/GIS</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004278</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Zagonari, F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Integrated coastal management: Top&#x2013;down vs. community-based approaches</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Env. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>88</VOLUME><PAGES>796-804</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Journal of Environmental Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Integrated coastal management; Top&#x2013;down approach; Community-based approach; Dynamic economic model, ICZM, ICAN</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>In this paper, a dynamic model is developed in which coastal quality can be improved, restored, or maintained by two distinct user&#xD;groups; this is done by identifying a context that ensures an increase (or a greater increase) in coastal quality in terms of specific features&#xD;that characterise the user groups. The results demonstrate that integrated coastal management is always better than non-integrated&#xD;management. Moreover, when there is a low degree of interest in maintaining the coastal use over time, only integrated community-based&#xD;(CB) coastal management will increase the coastal quality. Even when the interest in maintaining the coastal use over time is high, an&#xD;integrated CB approach is preferred if the willingness to pay for coastal improvements is great and the marginal inefficiency of&#xD;investments in coastal improvements is low, because the coastal quality improves to a greater extent; if not, only an integrated top&#x2013;down&#xD;(TD) approach to coastal management will increase the coastal quality. These results suggest that developing countries should always&#xD;adopt a CB approach; in contrast, developed countries should adopt a CB approach where local stakeholders attach direct values to the&#xD;coastal quality, and adopt a TD approach where the general population attaches indirect (option or existence) values to coastal quality.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>ICZM_community_based.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000002902</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Zann, L. P.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>1999</YEAR><TITLE>A new (old) approach to inshore resources management in Samoa</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Ocean Coast. Mgmt.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>42</VOLUME><PAGES>569-590</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Ocean &amp; Coastal Management</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>SSE</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><NOTES>Blue folder, SSE Papers</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004401</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Zhao, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Di, L.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yu, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yue, P.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wei, Y.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Yang, W.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Semantic web based geospatial knowledge transformation</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Comp. Geosci</SECONDARY_TITLE><PAGES>doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.013</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Computers &amp; Geosciences</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>semantic web, Ontology, Web Service, Service Chain, Scientific Workflow</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Earth and space science research and applications typically involve collecting and analyzing large volumes of&#xD;geospatial data much of which is derived from other existing data by applying a scientific workflow. Such a&#xD;step-by-step process can be viewed as a process of geospatial knowledge transformation which often involves&#xD;hypotheses, inferences and integrations to derive user-specific data products from the knowledge of domain experts.&#xD;Our research is focused on reducing the transformation effort by providing component inference and integration tools.&#xD;The Semantic Web envisions a new standardized information infrastructure to enable interoperable&#xD;machine-to-machine interactions and automatic or semi-automatic service chaining for deriving knowledge over&#xD;networks. This paper describes a generic framework and implementation of how the Semantic Web proceeds through&#xD;the life cycle of geospatial knowledge transformation, from geospatial modeling (knowledge formalization), through&#xD;model instantiation (service chain) to model execution (data product). Our approach relies on semantic integrations.&#xD;A number of ontologies used to capture domain knowledge are introduced in this paper as the basis of knowledge&#xD;bases for describing and reasoning geospatial data and services. Also, a semantically-enabled geospatial catalog&#xD;service is described to enable more effective discovery, automation and integration of geospatial data and services.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>semantic_web_knowl.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004355</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Zhao, T.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Zhang, C.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Wei, M.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Peng, Z. R.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Ontology-based geospatial data query and integration</TITLE><SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Cova, T. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Miller, H. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Beard, K.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Frank, A. U.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR><SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Goodchild, M. F.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR></SECONDARY_AUTHORS><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geographic Information Science: 5th International Conference, GIScience 2008</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Berlin and Heidelberg</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Springer-Verlag</PUBLISHER><VOLUME>Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5266</VOLUME><PAGES>370-392</PAGES><TERTIARY_TITLE>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</TERTIARY_TITLE><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geographic Information Science: 5th International Conference, GIScience 2008, Park City, UT, USA, September 2008, Proceedings</ALTERNATE_TITLE><ISBN>3-540-87472-0</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>ontology, controlled vocabulary, ICAN, transportation</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>9</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000004198</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Zhou, Q.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Lees, B.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Tang, G.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2008</YEAR><TITLE>Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography 5021, 5th European SemanticWeb Conference, ESWC 2008, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, June 1-5, 2008, Proceedings</SECONDARY_TITLE><PLACE_PUBLISHED>Berlin/Heidelberg</PLACE_PUBLISHED><PUBLISHER>Springer</PUBLISHER><PAGES>462 pp.</PAGES><ISBN>978-3-540-77799-1</ISBN><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>Digital Terrain Modelling, GIS, Geomorphometry, Hydrologic Modelling, Terrain Analysis</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>Terrain analysis has been an active study field for years and attracted research studies from geographers, surveyors, engineers and computer scientists. With the rapid growth of Geographical Information System (GIS) technology, particularly the establishment of high resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEM) at national level, the challenge is now focused on delivering justifiable socio-economical and environmental benefits.&#xD;The contributions in this book represent the state-of-the-art of terrain analysis methods and techniques in areas of digital representation, morphological and hydrological models, uncertainty and applications of terrain analysis.</ABSTRACT><NOTES>PDF_Journal_articles --&gt; advances_terrain_analysis.pdf</NOTES></RECORD><RECORD><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><REFNUM>0000003794</REFNUM><AUTHORS><AUTHOR>Zibordi, G.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Melin, F.</AUTHOR><AUTHOR>Berthon, J.-F.</AUTHOR></AUTHORS><YEAR>2006</YEAR><TITLE>Comparison of SeaWiFS, MODIS and MERIS radiometric products at a coastal site</TITLE><SECONDARY_TITLE>Geophys. Res. Ltr.</SECONDARY_TITLE><VOLUME>33</VOLUME><NUMBER>L06617</NUMBER><PAGES>doi:10.1029/2006GL025778</PAGES><ALTERNATE_TITLE>Geophysical Research Letters</ALTERNATE_TITLE><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD>remote sensing, ocean color, ocean optics</KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><ABSTRACT>SeaWiFS, MODIS and MERIS remote sensing&#xD;radiometric products were assessed using in situ data&#xD;collected at a coastal site in the northern Adriatic Sea from&#xD;May 2002 to September 2005. The analysis was restricted to&#xD;satellite and in situ data taken within one hour interval to&#xD;minimize the effects of temporal variability of atmosphere&#xD;and seawater around the measurement site. The comparison&#xD;of SeaWiFS and MODIS normalized water-leaving&#xD;radiances with in situ values showed averages of relative&#xD;percent difference varying from 0% to  9% in the 443&#x2013;555&#xD;nm spectral range. Higher values ranging from +15 to +42%&#xD;were observed for the MERIS data in the equivalent spectral&#xD;range (i.e., 443&#x2013;560 nm).</ABSTRACT><NOTES>seawifs_modis.pdf</NOTES></RECORD></RECORDS></XML>