Report of the UCGIS Policy and Legislation Committee
Nov. 9, 1998

The responsibilities of the Policy and Legislation Committee as set forth in the bylaws are as follows:
This committee identifies, acquires, analyzes, and reports to UCGIS member universities any geographic information science related policies or legislation being adopted or considered by local, state, federal, or international law bodies that might be relevant to the goals set forth in Article III or otherwise affect the research and teaching programs related to geographic information science. The committee shall propose and develop legislation if needed in support of the goals of Article III, propose and draft responses to proposed legislation that may be adverse to or support the goals set forth in Article III, and develop approaches for communicating with legislators, agency personnel, and other policy makers.

A Roundtable on Policy and Legislation Initiatives was held from 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM, Sunday November 8, Room W 110, Convention Center.

Among the items discussed and recommendations arising from that meeting include the following:

  1. Results of the membership survey relating to Policy and Legislation Committee matters indicate that the goals of this committee remain high priorities for the organization. The committee should retain a primary focus on expanding university funding for advancement of geographic information science and engineering on a nation-wide basis.
  2. The Policy and Legislation Committee recommends that our primary activitiy in Washington DC this year should be in conjunction with the Geodata Policy Forum to be held June 7 - 9.
  3. At least one representative from each university or national research lab is highly encouraged to attend the Geodata Policy Forum.
  4. The P&L Committee will supply a draft letter for university personnel to send to their members of Congress prior to the Forum. The letter should indicate that they will be in DC for the Forum and that while in town they would like to meet with the member of Congress to discuss a few issues.
  5. The P&L Committee will provide packets to drop off to members of Congress and a series of talking points for the visits. UCGIS members are encouraged to invite others from their state to accompany them when they make their congressional office visits, such as members of NSGIC or the commercial sector.
  6. Because major efforts relating to GI Science research are ongoing within NSF and within the federal agency establishment, we recommend that UCGIS not initiate any independent legislation this year. Rather we will be developing opportunities to support those other efforts - such as placing support statements in the packets delivered to members of Congress and providing testimony at hearings.
  7. At the upcoming summer assembly, the planned mimi-symposium on a Science of Geographic Information should be highly supportive of the internal efforts at NSF. At the upcoming summer assembly, the planned talks and breakout groups on identifying the limitations of geographic information technologies in key application domains should be highly complementary to the applications which are the focus of the Community/Federal Information Partnerships (C/FIP) funding program being coordinated by OMB. (Note: Norman Gunderson provided an extensive briefing on the C/FIPs initiative to the Committee)

Additional Discussion / Activities:

  1. The U.S. Government Accounting Office should be asked by a Chair of a Congressional Committee to carry out a study on the extent of GI activities and expenditures within and outside of government. The UCGIS P&L committee should investigate how this might best be achieved.
  2. When legislation with potential adverse effects on the geographic information community arises in Congress, the Chair of the P&L Committee and the President of UCGIS have been drafting response letters addressed to appropiate members of Congress. These drafts have been circulated by e-mail to the membership and the Board for comment and a vote taken by the Board prior to sending the letters. In some instances when deemed appropriate, the Chair of the P&L Committee has drafted letters to members of Congress and encouraged others to write similar letters to their members of Congress in their own states. Our intent is to continue this procedure.
  3. Although significant trepidations were expressed, there is probably some merit in exploring whether UCGIS might become more informed about proposed bills in Congress potentially affecting the funding of research by working with MAPPS or other organizations rather than relying primarily on volunteer efforts by our membership and our more informal networks.
  4. Arranging for briefings by selected agencies in Washington DC to the UCGIS membership was thought to be a very good idea. The purpose of the agency briefings would be to discover:
  5. the extent and nature of geographic information technology and science activities in which the agency is involved,
  6. the shortcomings, difficulties or limitations that agency personnel may be experiencing in using geographic information technologies,
  7. the extent and nature of mission-focused research in geographic information science and technology that currently is accomplished by the agency and the extent to which the research is accomplished by agency personnel, universities or the commercial sector,
  8. the full scope of university funding currently being supported by the agency across all branches and areas of responsibility of the entire agency, and
  9. procedures by which university personnel might work with agencies in seeking solutions to geographic information technology and science limitations of mutual interest. Agencies that we would be most interested in hearing from are those that are using geographic information technologies to accomplish missions that relate to major application domains, such as public health, crime, agriculture, transportation, housing, ecosystem management, emergency management, defense, etc. It was felt that such briefings should be held in Washington DC in conjunction with the annual Congressional activity. However, we should not pursue this activity this year due to other events in DC surrounding the GeoData Forum.
  10. Due to the responses on our membership survey, it was suggested that UCGIS might want to "require" all of our members to visit Washington DC at least once per year to help the organization build relationships with agencies and members of Congress. A suggested alternative was that UCGIS should consider having two meetings per year ... one in Washington DC during the first week of February and the other in the summer.

ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THIS COMMITTEE, PLEASE FORWARD YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS TO onsrud@spatial.maine.edu